Would this law save injury/lives?? - paul2007
Hi

I've though about it before and wondered why some car manufactures do not allow this option or better still, why it's not made law.

I refer to rally car style harness seat belts adapted to fit standard cars.

Would I right in assuming that other than drivers feeling uncomfortable initially just like the standard seat belt law, a harness belt may massively reduce injuries to drivers and passengers??

Thanks in advance


ps - is there an adapter available to fit over standard belt to make into a harness type belt?

Edited by Pugugly on 20/01/2010 at 19:05

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - NARU
What makes you think they'll massively reduce injury?

Rally drivers assume they'll end up upside down at some time - fortunately rollovers are fairly rare for most of us.
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - paul2007
Hi

IMO and I'm no expert but spreading the load over your chest in an impact surely reduces the risk of injury, yes?
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - freddy1
yawn

because they are static belts you cannot move ,

vis: look over your sholder

or even reach your phone,



Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - paul2007
You can look over your shoulder my friend as i've been in an audi rally car.

Don't forget friend, i did mention adapted types for ordinary cars.

thanks
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Old Navy
You can look over your shoulder my friend as i've been in an audi rally
car.


Is there a type of transport you haven't used?
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Martin Devon
Is there a type of transport you haven't used?

Hearse.
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Old Navy
Hearse.


He probably used one as a gig van for his boy band.
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - freddy1
rally type harnesses are of the 6 point , or even 8 point fixing , running into the rear floorpan of the vehicle , therefore rendering the back seets unusable


i can only think that "adapted types " would be nothing like "racing harnesses" , probably more like the old static type "with adattives"



so how are you going to make a 3 point static belt , work like a 6 point?


wield a big bar between the driver/passenger mounted from the floor to roof ? , extra bars behind the seats (missing rear passengers? to attach it?


ok "my friend" ,,,over to you
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - paul2007
My friend, surely there is massive room for straighforward improvement to the seat belt!!

i'm not asking for the full harness my friend, but a more even distribution of load over cchest in the event of an impact.

i've already had an idea as i post this and acutally going to copyright my section and forward it to volvo via registered post - hence my idea.

over to you friend!
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - pda
Removed unrelated content

Edited by smokie on 20/01/2010 at 19:56

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Old Navy
Removed unrelated content

Edited by smokie on 20/01/2010 at 19:58

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Altea Ego
Paul

two points.

I have driven and been driven in group B rally cars. (the realy hairly monsters.)

I was unable to turn round due to the restriction of the full harness. If you could, it wasnt done up properly


point 2, rally cars dont have airbags, cars do. I have also written off a car, big time. The standard belt and airbags did me just fine.


NO change needed
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - paul2007
AE

All i have done is posted an idea on the basis that a seat bealt that covered a larger part of the chest/sholders would disperse the impact load. along with the inertia type seat belt, surely reduce the risk of injury. I'm not saying we need a full harness type seat belt.

I still beleive that there are straightforward types of improvements to seat belts for roads cars and this will help all.
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - gmac
Why would you want a cross your heart seat belt ? Unless you have some kind of central mounting point then the load is still going to transfer over to the side of the car where the single upper mount is.

Remember also some cars only have two doors so rear ease of access has to be considered.

My moobs are big enough yet to require lifting and separating or is this what you have in mind :)

www.emmitsburg.net/humor/pictures/2005/seat_belt.j...g - cartoon link

Edited by gmac on 20/01/2010 at 20:17

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - CGNorwich
"over to you friend"

Nice to know you have one Paul! somehow I couldn't imagine it:-)

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Devolution
I don't see that trying to copyright such an idea (or patent) is any good. 4,5,6 and 7 point seatbelts have been around for years in non road cars and indeed in fighter aircraft (though for different reasons.) I would say with some certainty that most major car manufacturers have studied and researched the holy grail of safety systems, and looked to improve on it.

As already stated the harness in a rally car is designed in the absence of other safety systems, to hold the driver in place and to allow the roll bars to do the work. In a road car the seatbelt has to work with a range of other systems. Nowadays the additional techonology with various pretensioners and sensors provide amazing repsonse and reduced risk or serious injury.

Some of the most serious injuries are caused by rapid deceleration and the internal organs such as the heart smacking into your rib cage. A harness, although spreading the weight for external bruising and injury is not designed with the same flexibility.

I saw a demo of the new Mercedes system a while back. By now I imagine all modern cars operate similarly - when the front sensors detect impact, the seatbelt is released to allow the occupants forward with the momentum, to slow the body slightly more gracefully, before tightening and pulling the person back into the seat to avoid to close contact with the exploding airbag. This all happens in something like a quarter of a second. (It also does several other clever things which I now forget...)

And Paul, please don't go modifying your existing seatbelts, the insurance company would frown upon it and your MOT will fail it! ;-)

Edited by Devolution on 20/01/2010 at 20:19

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - paul2007
D


Good and informative post

I too is aware of the rapid deceleration/etc.

the point about 'mod' my seat belts, I won't - but certain you said that in jest.

however, I do have an idea and the copyright is the letter i will send dated via reg post.

I may be mistaken but about a year ago i recall a tv prog that showed a seat belt with an integrated airbag, ie to reduce load on a body part and aid declaration - not sure if i imagined this or really did see it on the tv.

If I could help in anyway in improving car/vehicle safety i'd be well chuffed.

Edited by paul2007 on 20/01/2010 at 20:35

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Devolution
the point about 'mod' my seat belts I won't - but certain you said that
in jest.


Of course!
I may be mistaken but about a year ago i recall a tv prog that
showed a seat belt with an integrated airbag...


You did. Ford have trialled ideas based around this to cushion you more:

tinyurl.com/ybwr4a9

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - paul2007
Cheers D for clearing that one up!!!

Must put the laptop down on the floor and concentrate on the tv and unwind as v early start tomorrow.

:)

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Lygonos
You'll be back....muwahahahahaaaaaa

[/Vincent Price voice]

Edited by Lygonos on 20/01/2010 at 21:03

Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - corax
if I could help in anyway in improving car/vehicle safety I'd be well chuffed


I look forward to seeing you on Dragons Den!
Would this law Save Injury/Lives?? - Dynamic Dave
You can look over your shoulder as i've been in an audi rally car.


The driver didn't happen to be called John did he?
Would this law save injury/lives?? - FotheringtonThomas
Would I right in assuming that(snip) a harness belt may massively reduce injuries
to drivers and passengers??


I very much doubt it.
Would this law save injury/lives?? - martint123
There is the converse argument that the safer you make a driver, the more risks they will take or the more invulnerable they feel.

Why didn't you suggest the whole hog - full roll cage, plastic windows, helmets - and then ending up with the man with a red flag in front.
Would this law save injury/lives?? - nb857
I think I am right to say that a significant number of car occupant ities were not wearing a seat belt. So if they are not going to click in a normal seat belt, they are not going to be inclined to buckle up rally driver style to go to get a pint of milk.
Would this law save injury/lives?? - Devolution
Absolutely right, the reason the 3 point remains popular as ease of use for all abilities/ages, and simple quick release mechanism.

Edited by Devolution on 20/01/2010 at 22:47

Would this law save injury/lives?? - Old Navy
Agreed Devolution, even the automatic three point belts tried in the USA were too clumsy to be popular, and most people used them as manual belts if at all. They were soon dropped.

Edited by Old Navy on 20/01/2010 at 22:59

Would this law save injury/lives?? - bell boy
what about making all car drivers wear nhs approved crash helmets with airbags fitted on all corners paul2007?
this way we could all drive tuk tuks safely