You are completely blameless.
That may not be enough to stop the sale being voided.
|
|
You weren't aware that the mileage wasn't genuine until you investigated after the buyer complained. You are completely blameless.
Perhaps. Or perhaps not. OP sounds like a trade seller. I guess he has a duty of care to his buyers. OP should have done his own due diligence more carefully.
OTOH, the difference in value between a car that has done 122k and 222k cannot be much.
|
If the OP is a trader he has no more duty of care to his buyers via an auction than any other seller. From a trader's point of view that is the whole point of disposing via auctions: you can get rid of any or every bit old tat you wouldn't dare retail with no threat of comeback.
In this case it depends on the T&C's of the individual auction house. To be honest, if the OP did not warrant the mileage I see no reason why he was under any obligation to do any due diligence whatsoever.
Edited by pd on 23/05/2008 at 11:13
|
|
|