Doesn't do to be less than perfect eh.
My lottery win, if i wasted money on the lottery that is, would launch a magazine whose sole purpose in existence would be to photograph, follow, criticise, harass, mock, ridicule in any way the photographers and writers of drivel who inhabit the low end of the press.
With the aim of exposing any slight philandering or mistake made when submitting expenses for example.
Wouldn't take long for the paparazzi, and the alleged journalists to be shouting about unfairness if they couldn't take a hol without being spied on.
Claksons entitled to a bit of privacy like anyone else, if he gets comments about his professional capacity fair do's.
I want his job though, lucky so and so.
|
|
That is an old picture - they have dug that out of the archives.
|
|
Guilty! Of being middle aged! And those shorts being worn 3 years running? very environmentally friendly. A major surprise to see the Daily Mail run this (non)story- its usually the Mirror that takes great pleasure in sniping at Clarkson.
|
|
And does he give two hoots? No.
|
|
|
£20,795was £20,995Details
£20,290was £20,490Details
£17,750was £18,000Details
£13,641was £13,800Details
