Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
Where do the much-vaunted independents learn their trade? At franchised dealers, I've no doubt. And from where do they get their technicians? Probably those sacked by franchised dealers for incompetence. From past experience I'd choose a franchised dealer over an independent any day.
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - adverse camber
Are you feeling particularly bolshy these days Mr Snail?

All the indy techs that I know who started in Franchised dealers moved to make more money, to do more interesting work and have more responsibility.

On behalf of those techs - who I know to be very competent and dont fix by replacing bits at my expense until the problem goes away - I am offended by your ignorance.
Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
I am
offended by your ignorance.


Not ignorance, in fact far from it. Experience.
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - adverse camber
>>sacked by franchised dealers for incompetence

No. Offensive ignorance.
Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
Are you feeling particularly bolshy these days Mr Snail?


So it's OK for you lot to run down franchised dealers right left and centre, but I'm not to be allowed to give my opinions based on my experiences?
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - J Bonington Jagworth
"particularly bolshy"

I think it's his tooth.

While there are charlatans in all walks of life, I can't imagine that messing about with the oily (and dirty) bits of other people's cars is something anyone would put up with for long if they didn't have the aptitude or motivation. The trick with garages is to find one that has the right attitude to its customers, seems competent and has reasonable charges. My favourite independent is run by a couple of ex rally drivers - I'm not sure they had any formal training at all!
Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
I think it's his tooth.


I think I'm starting to get to the root of the matter!
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - rjr
Probably those sacked by franchised dealers for incompetence.


I think that is unfair. It is not unusual for a senior technician to decide that after 20 years learning their trade they feel that they are confident enough to be their own boss and go it alone.

There is room in the trade for both independents and franchised dealers and in my opinion we as customers are better off having a choice.
Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
It is not unusual for a senior technician to decide
that after 20 years learning their trade they feel that they are confident enough to
be their own boss and go it alone.


How many independents are a one-man business? The boss might be OK, but (in my experience) their employers are not much cop.
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
their employers


Oops ~ should have said employees.
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - normd2
i've seen both sides of this; used to have a company car that had to be serviced at the main dealer - their attitude? 'milk this customer for anything possible'. Now I have my own car I use a small ( 4 guys) indy - their attitude? 'your car needs this done and this is why, if you're going to do it yourself here's how to do it, if you get stuck we'll sort it'
Guess which I prefer?
Much-vaunted independents - J Bonington Jagworth
"should have said employees"

L'escargot: Edit button. Edit button: L'escargot. Charmed, I'm sure... :-)
Much-vaunted independents - Ruperts Trooper
We can all only go on our own experiences.

Over nearly 40 years every franchised dealer I've ever dealt with has screwed up in a significant way - I've long had a policy of only using franchised dealers while the vehicle is under manufacturer's warranty. Franchised parts departments are only used where genuine parts aren't available elsewhere.

About 15 years ago, my wife had to find somewhere to MOT her car as our local tester was temporarily unauthorised so she used the first one she found in Yellow Pages. They failed it but suggested I talk to them instead of recommending expensive repairs - the discussion soon established a cost-effective repair and all was well. Subsequently I've got them to do more, and more, work that I can no longer do. The worst my local independent has done is throw away worn parts before I examined them.

I'm not a mechanic. I can read Haynes and use commonsense. When franchised dealers consistently fall below that standard then something is seriously wrong and until they sort it out, I'm not using them any more than I have to.
Much-vaunted independents - Carse
L'escargot

When I have read people complain about dealers they usually site examples of their woes, perhaps you should do the same to allow us the benefit of your experiences rather than single line rhetoric.

Carse
Much-vaunted independents - DP
Been ripped off only twice by the car maintenance trade in my driving career, and both times it was a main dealer.

Had generally good service from all, but never had a bad experience from an indie. Service is much more personal, and they seem to understand that a £700 bill on a car is a really big deal to most people.

Cheers
DP
--
04 Grand Scenic 1.9 dCi Dynamique
00 Mondeo 1.8TD LX
Much-vaunted independents - L'escargot
.......allow us the benefit of your experiences ............


OK, I'll start with the Citroen "specialist" who diagnosed the water leak into the boot of my ZX as being down to the sunroof. They presented me with a bill for a "nominal" 3 hours labour, but said that they had spent far more time on it than that but daren't invoice me for the true time spent. Their "solution" had been to seal (bodge) up all sorts of irrelevant slots in the channel surrounding the sunroof. The next time it rained water came into the boot as previously. It took me 5 minutes to pull the boot carpet away from the rear panel of the boot and spot the real cause. The rear panel was made up of 2 overlapping pieces (the lower piece being outermost) with a horizontal spot-welded seam. On the inside of the boot, along the length of the seam, was a factory applied bead of sealant. However, over a length of several inches the sealant had missed the seam. I cured the leak with a tube of bathroom sealant. It appeared that the "specialist" hadn't even thought of looking in the boot, which was where the leak was!

Then there was a Peugeot "specialist" who said that they couldn't solve a steering vibration problem in my 306 by balancing one of the wheels because the wheel was buckled. Afterwards I took the car to a Peugeot franchised dealer who demonstrated in my presence that the wheel was perfect and they then proceeded to balance the wheel for free, with the advice that in future I came direct to them ~ which I did.

Then there was .......

Over the past 40-odd years I've done business with numerous "specialists" and been disappointed, to say the least, every time. I've never yet been disappointed with a franchised dealer.
--
L\'escargot.
Much-vaunted independents - tyro
Well, I've known people who have had bad experiences with the small garages and independents, who now insist on going to the big franchised dealers.

And I've known people who have had bad experiences with the big franchised dealers who now go to small independent garages.

I don't know, but I understand that research indicates that there is no significant difference - you get good and bad on both sides of the divide.

Myself? I'm fairly neutral. Both my cars are out of warranty. I got one of them serviced this year by a big franchised dealer, the other by a small independent.

The guy who runs the small place struck me as an honest bloke, and I know that a lot of people who use small independents do so simply because they know and trust the owners. It is very difficult to get the same "I trust these people" feeling from a big dealer.

On the other hand, if a dealership treats me well, and seems to do a good job, then I'm happy to use them. The offer of a courtesy car when my car is in for servicing is very tempting - and something the independent cannot match. Sure, I'm paying for it - but I'm willing to.
Much-vaunted independents - expat
I am lucky enough to live in a small town where everyone knows everyone else. This tends to keep businesses on their toes. I have a choice of two good independents and a good main Ford dealer. I know all the staff and the owners and have known them for over twenty years. I have always had a fair deal from all of them. One exhaust fitting place tried to rip me off many years ago. I have never been back since and I have told everyone I know.

I think that by and large you get a better deal from a small family owned business whether they be an independent or a dealer.
Much-vaunted independents - Group B
I have not had a problem with a main dealer service myself, apart from the price, indifferent customer service, and inability to provide a courtesy car. And there is an indy specialist I have used once that I would not go back to; but the one I currently use is excellent.
I switched to the current independant after getting a quote from a main dealer for over £500 for a service; phoned the indy and they quoted £325 for the same service.

The one I use is an ex main dealer technician (over 20 years) but also an *enthusiast* who races Saabs. He works to the full Saab service schedule, down to greasing door hinges (this came up in the Clio loose bonnet thread a while back).
It is assumed I need a courtesy car (a proper like-for-like car) instead of me having to beg for one. Overall the service is very friendly and I trust them. My car always feels like new when I get it back.

My father is also happily using an indy for his Audi A4 after being charged over £800 for a service which included changing brake disks and pads that did not need changing. They refused to release the car without changing them as it was against their H&S policy (we were not aware of block exemption at the time). We checked them later with a micrometer and there was still plenty of life in them, also the in-dash wear indicators had not been triggered.
When he said he would source his tyres elsewhere (rather than pay their inflated prices) they got really upset, and said "we cannot do the post-service test drive as the car is dangerous", the tyres may not have had the now-recommended 3mm tread but were definitely legal and it was a dry day). Pathetic.
They also tried to charge him £24 to change a brake light bulb.

They must be so used to company car drivers coming in and accepting any figure, because the company pays it..

And dont get me started on the local Alfa Romeo dealsership..
Much-vaunted independents - pendulum
Probably those sacked by franchised dealers for incompetence.


If main dealers sacked their mechanics for incompetence they wouldn't have any left. In my experience... ;)

Edited by pendulum on 16/11/2007 at 12:06

Much-vaunted independents - Falkirk Bairn
For 3 years I had the car serviced where I had bought it new - 54,000mls and great service.
Change of job so it was no longer convenient so I went back to a local Independent. 30,000 mls OK then an Engine mgt Light came on - back to the local franchised Dealer to get it investigated.

They found nothing re the EML but said the following was reqd - Condenser on AC, brakes(disks & pads back and front), Suspension bushes worn.............................. £1,000 +VAT!

My local Indie checked the car after this and again it was checked at another Franchised garage at the manufacturer's expense (after a complaint letter). The 2nd outlet said front brakepads & disks in the near future (£215) + 2 tyres (Michelins £126).

Waited 6 months Service & MoT, MoT £40, Brakes done at Service (£100), 2 x Michelin Tyres @ Costco £80, Service £120 - £340 in total. Indie cannot do AC so mobile AC man £50 for a gas fill - other than gas trhe system was hale and hearty(as far as he could see.

Car sold at 90,000mls

Where did I buy my new car? Motorpoint - no faffing, straight forward deal, no looking down their nose at my 7 yr old Honda - matched the Franchised dealer valuation and was considerably lower price for the new car.

Independent to keep the car going + Motorpoint for the new motor gets my vote as the way to go.

Much-vaunted independents - Snakey
I've used many varied independents and franchised dealers over the years and have to see neither would be 'better' than the other.

The indies are usually cheaper, but I've had my fair share of problems with them. The franchised dealers are more expensive, but without the guarantee that the work is done any better.

Depends entirely on the garage and the team that work within it. If you find a good one stick with it!
Much-vaunted independents - bell boy
i know quite a few independant garages mainly run by the man and his dog or just a couple of workers and the overiding factor is they dont need to advertise, in fact they are usually so busy that they dont even need new custom,therefore for the likes of the original poster it sounds like sour grapes and humbug,he tried an indy probably recommended to him and the indy didnt like the cut of his gruff and sent him off with a flea'a in his lug oil

smiley smiley
Much-vaunted independents - Aprilia
It is difficult for franchised dealer servicing to be competitive at any level.

First of all the dealer is saddled with meeting so-called 'dealer standards' - right sort of floor tiles, desks etc etc. In some cases (e.g. certain German brands) ALL of the fittings in the premises are specified and the dealer has to source them from one supplier. This often means that chairs cost £150, desks cost £500 and so on - this is quite apart from the costs of the structure and special tools, facilities that the dealer is supposed to have (e.g. disabled toilets, must have 'office area' for business customers etc etc). There is only one person to pay for all of this - the customer. I don't think many customers realise how much of a stranglehold the manfrs have on the dealers.

New car retailing is under a lot of pressure, and margins are slim. So more often than not the service dept is subsidising the sales dept. - this is why you have £100p.h. labour costs. The service manager lives in a world of 'upselling', 'selling work' KPI's, efficiency targets etc etc. Many service depts operate at well over 100% efficiency (i.e. they are doing work in less than book time and so charge you the book 1 hour but spend 40 minutes doing the job). Most jobs will be service jobs and the car will be easy to work on (nothing siezed) and 'parts rich' (i.e. good chance of selling brake work etc).
Now the service techs are probably earning £25k p.a. but keeping the dealership afloat. They will have spent 3+ years in training/apprenticeship and have had to keep abreast of the latest technology (not easy these days). The sales guys could be on anywhere (on the average) from £30-50k or more, plus a car and health plan. That's not bad for a job which essentially requires no qualifications. I think it is unsurprising that the better techs decide to go independent. I know of one main dealer which has recently increased its labour rate to £100 but the techs are earning the same as two years ago.

Of course there are bad independents and some are simply scam artists. However one thing to bear in mind is that most towns have one franshised dealer, but several independents - so the independents face strong competition. But if you want the dealer stamp in the book there is therefore little competition for the dealer. Service retention by dealers in years 0-3 is typically 80% or more because customers are effectively 'buying the stamp'. After three years the retention plummets as customers go to independents. Of course its at this point that more complicated faults rear their head and the customer is paying out of his own pocket (rather than warranty) - so indpendents generally get more involved jobs and have to do the work to a tighter budget.
Much-vaunted independents - Ruperts Trooper
It is difficult for franchised dealer servicing to be competitive at any level.


Much as I respect your opinion Aprilia, that statement's a load of tosh.

Why should it be difficult for franchised dealers to be market leaders, not just competitive, for competence and integrity? Many of us could cope with higher costs at a franchised dealer if the work was done properly.

Edited by Ruperts Trooper on 16/11/2007 at 17:51

Much-vaunted independents - Clk Sec
I?ve only had cause to complain on two occasions in the past. In both instances it was small non-franchised garages that carried out less than satisfactory servicings.

My local Mazda dealer has looked after my car for the past five years and I?ve been entirely satisfied with both quality and price.

Clk Sec
Much-vaunted independents - Carrow
There are no excuses for either to give poor service IMO. Dealers have access to the latest dignostics equipment and technical bulletins and latest training as a matter of course.
Independants can buy the latest diagnostics from the leading suppliers (Bosch, Delphi, Facom/Sykes etc) and traing is included when you make the initial purchase. These companies also supply software updates and such like.

I have worked in main dealers & have seen first hand the blatant rip-off practises, the worst one (which does go on all the time) is getting an apprentice to carry out a service
and still charging the full price. The technician the apprentice is assigned to gets all the time so makes his bonus quota and looks super efficient. "Selling up" is also drilled into the technicians so before you take your car to the dealer make sure all your bulbs are working and your wiper blades are new.
Much-vaunted independents - bignick2
Most technicians become disillusioned with the franchised sector once they start to work out their wages as a proportion of the charge to the customer. They pretty soon realise they are working to support the non productive staff that dealer standards insist are there to provide the "customer experience" (excuse me while I spit)

Around here (the Thames Valley) dealer hourly charge out rates are anywhere between £85 - £150. If the technician saw all of that they would be on £3400 - £6000 per week. I would bet that the average technician is seeing well under 10% of that.

As the independent does not have to reach the dealer standards his overheads are lower. He can then offer a reduced charge to the customer to bring them in and can also pass a greater proportion of the labour charge to the technician which attracts them away from the franchised network.

The incompetent technicians are the ones who remain in the franchised network with the safety net of guaranteed warranty work to keep them employed.
Much-vaunted independents - Roger Jones
My experience with dealers involves Ford, VW/Audi and Mercedes over a period of 25 years (some before that, but via my employer's control).

All them demonstrated incompetence: Ford in misdiagnosing what later I found to be a well known fault and insisting on replacing a major part instead of just the correct lubrication that it actually needed; Audi in repeatedly failing the sort out a cool-running problem that was finally zapped overnight by the application of their very own injector cleaner (as recommended to me by HJ); and Mercedes in frightening me to the depths of my wallet when they failed to replenish an autobox -- which began to malfunction seriously -- with the correct amount of ATF during a major service that cost me over £650 more than five years ago.

Apart from all that, one of the greatest benefits of working with the independent I use is that I can talk to the man himself about the job that needs doing. What's more, he's mobile, so it's more convenient too. And I have now seen enough of his work and problem-solving ability to know that it's as good as, if not better than, any main dealer can offer.
Much-vaunted independents - gordonbennet
My Merc indy, bless him i wouldn't change for the world he's been working on them for forty years, his son also works with him as well and 99% of faults they can diagnose straight away, most faults he already is aware of, others take a very short time.

He charges very reasonably does the job properly and is rushed off his feet, and no i'm not going to name him he's got enough good customers who appreciate him and his staff, me included.

Please carry on putting thousands of pounds into the coffers of the main dealer, i don't want my good indy too busy to look after me.
Much-vaunted independents - Paul I
If people are fool enough to swallow this Main dealers are best rubish then they don't deserve the wisdom of an independent. Granted there are some very good main dealers but some are just out to sell loans not even cars.

Where I live in a smaller town we have seen quite a few dealers close and move to the next town where mega garages are created.

When our local Fiat garage close two brothers who worked there decided to set up on their own granted their reception isn't spotless but they do a fantastic job. On my college course there were as many apprentices in independents as main dealers.

One VW garage I know has a daily target on servicing sales, part sales, air-con sales etc this all adds up to a £35K turnover target to meet per week. The guy who does my MOT has none of that rubbish to deal with.
Much-vaunted independents - Number_Cruncher
I worked in a Vauxhall garage, ahem, some! time ago.

So, a couple of years ago, when we bought a 6 month old Astra, you can guess what we did.

Yes, that's right!, ignoring the warranty nonsense, I've always serviced it at home, to make sure that it's done right, and not serviced by their latest apprentice filter spinner.

My experience of going to work in a workshop - bearing in mind at this point I was 18 and had no motor vehicle qualifications - was quite stark. We did some paperwork in the office, and, half an hour later, I was beginning to do a service a mkII Astra on my own and un-supervised. Of course, the customer was paying for "factory trained technician" time!

After a while, I did become "factory trained". I went on a one day course on Bosch Motronic at Ellesmere Port.

Of course mistakes can be made at both main dealers and at independent garages - it's much too simplistic to say one is perfect and the other rubbish. The thing to remember is that an independent has only his quality, fairness and the good reports of his customers to keep him in work. Typically, they aren't on a main road, they don't have fancy showrooms and receptions - people need to find them, and they rely on reputation.

If you have a fault with a complex vehicle specific system - like the post in technical about an Easytronic Corsa - then an independent is unlikely to be your best bet. However, if you have something more common, and the fault is more mundane then your probably better off at an independent.

My father ran an independent workshop, MOT station and haulage business. None of his mechanics were allowed to work unsupervised until he had spent enought time looking over their shoulder to be happy with what they did - even then, he was apt to ask them to step aside if there was anything a bit tricky going on.

Aprilia's post further up is IMO an accurate statement of how dealerships tend to work. If the mechanics are on bonus, they have absolutely no incentive to get involved finding a tricky fault - effectively, they loose pay by doing so. Dealer mechanics and their service managers like a nice steady stream of services, ideally with brake and suspension parts to be added to the list of jobs.

Bonus in dealerships can be taken to extremes. As an example, I've seen a head gasket fitted to a Nova 1.2by buzzing the head bolts out, jacking the head off via the exhaust front pipe, freeing the head gasket off the dowels, puling the old one out, sliding the new one in, dropping the jack, and buzzing the head bolts back in.

Bonus in independents is much rarer - more typically, the mechanics are paid a decent basic wage to begin with.

Number_Cruncher
Much-vaunted independents - ForumNeedsModerating
I agree with the 'pro-indie' stance. All things being equal, (i.e. that incompetents inhabit every sphere & level within any industry) indies rely more on quality of job rather than any nonsense of image or quality a franchised dealership is trying to portray. An experience recently to illustrate: the franchised Mercedes dealer with whom a service (I hope!) was carried out, indicated £600-700 worth of work was required to pass a forthcoming MOT. This, I've found out, via 3 independent sources, is a load of kibosh (sp?) & the car will pass ok as is. They've lost my custom for good, only the market requirement for a franchised dealer seevice stamp, for residual value purposes, will ever get me through their glass & stainless steel portals again.
Much-vaunted independents - oilrag
I service my own cars, well, oils filters etc. brakes are getting a bit gruelling now so I go to a local (good reputation) tyre brake place. There I stand by the car watching and chatting with the mech. When the wheel cylinders rubber is pulled back to check for leaks, i`m there.
I wonder off a bit at non crucial times, but although i`m 20 yards away on the forcourt, the car is still under my eye.
Have spent 2 hours at times just standing there `monitoring` under the guise of affable good natured interest. So never been done and the labour rates are good.

A main dealer tried to double up the labour charge for a cambelt job recently, trying to charge the full labour for a new waterpump even though it would be exposed during the cambelt job.
How about 3 hour labour charge for a waterpump just sitting there only needing unbolting?
I challenged them (receptionist) and they said "we have to drain the cooling system"
Took it elsewhere to a main dealer in another town and saved £150 on the total £200 cost of the new waterpump inc labour of the first (supplying) dealer.

I mentioned that here before (apologies) but here`s an update.
A few months later mentioned it to the service manager in passing when buying a part. Said he would bring it up with the receptionist, but it seemed a `lack lustre`response to me and I didn`t even get a letter of apology or a free bottle of screenwash ;) He did ask where we had the job done though.........
I mean... We only bought three new cars there in the last few years and had been letting them do repair jobs on a 5 year old car out of a sense of reciprocity regarding fair play and support.

So much for that, I might buy from a web source next time, `let` the dealer in question do any warranty work and a local independent do the in warranty services.

That said I might just do all the servicing myself and PINK FLUFFY DICE to them all. Because I`ve had independents try to rip me off too.

NB, Just abandoned the micky mouse part of the 3 year warranty on the van. Did it myself thus eliminating the apprentice who overfilled a 3 litre sump by 3/4 litre.
Oh, did I mention the extra oil and filter change I did 6 months after the main dealer 1st year service? Out popped the cheapest looking obscure name filter element.....

DIY for me in future.

regards

Much-vaunted independents - Clk Sec
I don?t see that anyone here is ?swallowing this main dealers are best rubbish?. Those of us who choose to have our cars serviced by a main dealers, because we have been more satisfied with them than we have been with non-franchised garages, are merely expressing an opinion based on our experience.

Regardless of category, there are clearly some service people who do an excellent job and others who don?t. While I remain satisfied with my local main dealer, that?s where I?ll remain.

Unless Aprilia services Mazda?s, that is !

Clk Sec
Much-vaunted independents - Bromptonaut
Round here we have something of a hybrid. Long standing family business just off M1 has main business selling servicing and repairing trucks and vans.

Around two years ago they obtained a franchise for service and repair on Citroen. Trained up some of their techs and took on a service manager previously with the sales palace across town. Seem to be building up quite a good customer base, my Cit usually has company!

Could be quite a good earner as they don't need the showroom and associated pressures/targets but still charge a market rate for techs time. Don't seem that keen on warranty work though.
Much-vaunted independents - bignick2
This is happening in response to the block exemption regulations. Citroen and I assume other manufacturers came up with the "authorised repairer" in a bid to retain some control of the service network.
Quite a few former small dealers took this route to avoid continuing to have to meet unaffordable corporate standards.
Much-vaunted independents - Aprilia
Stand-alone service and repair outlets have been a long-standing tradition of the southern European market, they are much less common in northern Europe and have declined in numbers. Typically they occur in the UK when a dealer is too small/weak to continue the investment required to be a sales point and so drops back to service and parts only.

A 2005 report on the implications of the 'current' Block Exemption, and statistics on number of sales & repair points in Europe etc is available here:

www.hwbinternational.co.uk/uploads/HWB_Brief_3_06_...f
Much-vaunted independents - lightnshade
10 years ago I took my then Boss over to the then central Birmingham Bentley dealers who had his Turbo R in for it's first service. Smiles turned quickly into fury when he blew several gaskets upon seeing dirty oil fingermarks on the previously pristine parchment leather armrest. 4 years later I had my rather less expensive car in with a franchise dealer who took me round my motor and showed me everything that had been done wrong in the previous service by a rival franchise from where I bought the thing - and offered to fix the lot FOC.

Some are rubbish, some are excellent. All down to what you encounter. I will say though that I've been using two independents for the last few years who are superb.
Much-vaunted independents - yorkiebar
And so many people wondered why so many trade people have left this site!

There is room for main dealer and independant, and a reason, demand and requirement for both in this trade!

For an independant to be poor (and not busy) then he/she has no one to blame but his/her self. For a main dealer to be poor then it is wrong to automatically assume its their techs! 99% of the time the fault lies with the management (doesnt it always?)

Poorly trained staff, management issue.
Poor repairs, tech fault? management issue.
Poor customer care, management issue.
Poor pricing policy, management issue.
Expensive pricing, customer choice.
etc etc.

But most independants choose to leave the main dealer safety net because of being exploited and/or fed up with doing the same job day in day out.

A typical main dealer (not all) will employ an apprentice or junior to do ALL or Most routine service work (but charged at normal rates of course). A junior, possibly qualified, person will do warranty work etc, and keep eye on apprentice if you are lucky! Any senior person, if there any at your dealer will do the problematic, or harder to diagnose, or even awkward customer jobs.

But why slag the techs off? Reading all the complaints of experiences on here, very few, if any, are the fault of the tech?

At a dealer how many times will the person doing the work actually be told exactly what the customer has said? And a good proportionof the time he would be able to identify the problem if he was allowed to talk to the customer! Hence the general trend of independant being better!

Biggest (most employees etc) is not always the best.

A good test of a good garage, at any level, is how busy they are. As bb said before most good independants are not generally looking for more customers; and that attitude probably wrankles with a few people who demand to be looked after before they will trust anyone with their prized possesion!

If you dont want to trust any one then dont. DIY it ! But just remember that trained guy is probably doing work you cant or wont; for a fraction of what you are earning!