Kia Rio - PW
Having been told a couple of weeks ago that my wifes Fiesta will most likely fail its MOT next year we're looking for a cheap and cheerful runabout for her.

Want something as new as possible, as low mileage as possible that shoud be relatively trouble free and last a few years. And must be cheap as chips.

Will probably go through the Auctions- preferred choice would be a Hyundai Accent but also contemplating a Mk1 Kia Rio. By all accounts very bland and uninspiring to drive, but will just be for knocking round town, taking the kids to nursery etc so who cares?

Or am I missing something and this will be a costly mistake?
Kia Rio - Statistical outlier
Focusing purely on mileage may be a bad idea. If the car has an artificially low mileage (and is not obviously clocked), it almost certainly means that it's hardly ever been taken on a long run. Short runs are about as bad for a car as it is possible to get. They won't have warmed up properly, with consequent heavy wear on the engine, and all other components will be heavily loaded by constant stop start driving.

For a small car, by all means try and get something with a reasonable mileage, I would just suggest avoiding anything that has clearly hardly been used.
Kia Rio - PW
Thanks Gordon- was looking at 5 years 40-50000 miles- coming in as same money for an Astra or Focus going on for 80-90000 miles.
Kia Rio - jase1
In my experience the Accent (at least the newer 2000- model) will be anything but a costly mistake. They're very reliable and most unlikely to give trouble. Yes they are bland but I still can't quite understand the savage depreciation on these cars -- most people should surely know by now that these cars are well put together. I personally don't think they're all that bad to drive either -- think mid-90s Nissan or Toyota and that's what you've got really. Accent diesels are used as taxis around the town I live, and the drivers seem happy with them. I can think of no greater recommendation.

Anyway, the Rio. Well engine-wise you shouldn't have a problem, as Kia used a derivative of an old Mazda unit. The rest of the mechanicals should be OK as well. Looking at the old Kia Pride, they seem to last well enough as well. Most problems you may get with any older Korean car would be down to neglect -- people who buy cheap cars often don't look after them properly, and Korean cars get cheap at a much earlier age.

Put it this way, Accents typically run for 150,000 miles in the States, so they're obviously capable. Don't really know too much about the Rio long-term but older Kias don't seem too bad.

You might have problems with parts cost with the Kia -- there aren't as many around as Accents (which are quite common if you keep an eye out for them, at least they are around these parts) and may be more expensive.
Kia Rio - bell boy
ive just bought a 51 plate accent and to be honest they are straight forward good cars the engine is simple the gear linkage a bit wobbly but they stop and start dead right bare in mind though the road tax goes on co and its just cost £68.75 to rent it up for 6 months.
would rather give the wife another fiesta than anything though as they can be fixed by monkeys with hammers and the bits are so commom they sometimes have bogoff days in my local motor factors
Kia Rio - GregSwain
Hyundai and Kia based their engines on Japanese designs, and are very Mitsubishi-esque and therefore reliable. The Rio is also mechanically sound, and Mk1 models go for buttons at auction. Basically they're a safer bet than most European cars if all you're after is a reliable runaround that will get the normal family wear and tear until it dies. Build quality is 10 times better than a modern Renault, so it shouldn't drop to bits in a hurry (despite what some people would like you to think).

Don't worry about mileage, most Accents and Rios will have well under 10k/yr on them. Look for a full service history, including cambelt changes (which all these engines have). If it's not had one for a few years, get it done. My personal choice would be a post-facelift (2000 onwards) Accent, because they're much better looking than the Mk1 Rio. There's even a diesel available, but it's only 3-cylinder for some reason, so rather rough.
Kia Rio - stevied
There's a chap in my neck of the woods who took a V reg Accent to Morocco, doing thousands of miles and going down some pretty mad roads. He said it was fine! They even did a feature on him in some local magazine.
Kia Rio - mare
Have a look at Nissan Almera's - they're cheap and pretty well screwed together. Our R reg has been fine for the last 8 years, one flat battery and a tiny oil leak aside
Kia Rio - daveyjp
We're in a similar position - my wife is going back to work after maternity leave and we will need another car so child care can be managed - needs to be reliable and have four doors, nothing too large though as parking space is limited. Looked at usual Fiestas etc, but I'm thinking about a Getz - I presume the five year warranty is transferable? If so at this age it will have a warranty equivalent to a new motor without the new car price.

Alternative being considered is a Yaris. Are consumable parts costs on either of these excessive?
Kia Rio - jase1
Yes the 5-year Hyundai warranty is fully transferrable. Unlimited mileage as well.

The Getz is very similar to the Accent mechanically. I've found parts costs to be reasonable. Official Hyundai parts are a bit expensive but not horrendously so -- I got new brake discs and pads fitted at an indie using genuine parts for £125. That's probably about £50 more than a Fiesta but it isn't massively expensive.

Not sure about the Yaris but probably similar to Hyundai.
Kia Rio - Stuartli
>>taking the kids to nursery etc so who cares?>>

I thought that the Rio was advertised on the basis that, if the kids walked to school, you got the car for a £1 deposit?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
What\'s for you won\'t pass you by
Kia Rio - daveyjp
Been on a bit of a trawl around the dealers today. Hyundai got a big no from SWMBO - made for the price it sells at and indicator is on the 'wrong' side. A couple of two year old models we saw looked to have done 10 times more mileage than that being shown - very tatty interiors.

Popped in to Toyota dealer - new Yaris is too expensive, old Yaris fitted the bill and we were tempted, but then we went in to the showroom and the Aygo got the real thumbs up. It's a pity these have the PSA 1.4 diesel and not the Toyota version fitted into the Yaris though as it's dog slow - 0-60 in 16 seconds as opposed to 10.5 in the Yaris. Looking at the brochure I can't see the point of the Aygo 1.4 diesel as the 1.0 petrol is quicker and has similar fuel consumption figures.

Toyota are offering 2 day test drives so we may have an Aygo for a weekend.
Kia Rio - jase1
Been on a bit of a trawl around the dealers today.
Hyundai got a big no from SWMBO - made for
the price it sells at and indicator is on the 'wrong'
side. A couple of two year old models we saw
looked to have done 10 times more mileage than that being
shown - very tatty interiors.


(1) The indicator stalk is on the *right* side -- you need to tell your missus she knows not what she is talking about (ducks for cover). It's the Euroboxes that have it all wrong.

(2) How people manage to make the interior on the Accent tatty after two years is beyond me. Mine is five years old, has done 65000 miles and looks much like the day it was bought. But I know what you mean, I've seen other Accents just as you describe -- although there are Accents being used as taxis where I live with 150k+ on the clock and the interiors are still not all that bad.
Kia Rio - tintin01
Have you considered a Mitsubishi Carisma? They are dull but reliable and practical. Actually, we did have a major part fail - the throttle body (a Volvo bit) failed because I had not been using high octane petrol, but Mitsubishi offered to go halves even though the car was over 5 years old. I have had mine for 5 years (now 7 years old) and it is only in the last year that it has needed anything for the MOT. It is a good size too - feels bigger than a Focus, but not as big as a Mondeo. You can get 'X' reg ones for around £3k. Also, my 1.8 GDi does 40mpg - that's just urban driving, it does a little bit more on long runs.

I would quite like to change my car but I only do low miles each year so can't really justify it when my Carisma is so reliable and cheap to run.
Kia Rio - daveyjp
There's another thread about indicator stalks, but when you have only ever driven cars with them on the left and the other car in the household has it on the left to introduce a right handed model would be a pain, even more so as we could chop and change who is driving which car on a regular basis and it would wind me up.

Carisma is too big, if I wanted a Focus sized car I'd buy another Focus.
Kia Rio - GregSwain
Hyundais and Kias both have indicators on the "wrong" side. It only takes half an hour to adjust, but if she's decided it's not for her.....

How about an Almera (mine's 6 years old, everything's still holding together like new). No cambelt to worry about either, just check it's had annual oil-changes and the chain doesn't sound like someone's rolling a dustbin down the street.

Alternatives.... Toyota Corolla, Daewoo Lanos, Mazda 323 or Demio?
Kia Rio - Avant
If I were making that choice I think I'd look at the Yaris (1.3), Skoda Fabia (1.4) or another Fiesta (1.25 or 1.4) - on the grounds that they are all good to drive as well as available aplenty and reasonably cheap and easy to repair. If you are happy with the small size of the Aygo, then a Ford Ka might be acheaper alternative. And there are Citroen and Peugeot versions of the Aygo, so look round for where the best deals are. The Aygo etc haven't been on sale for very long so you'd be looking at a new or nearly-new car.
Kia Rio - daveyjp
Yaris, Fiesta and Aygo/C1/107 are now favourites. Ka would be top of the list, but it only has three doors.
Kia Rio - lordwoody
Aygo's are currently being offered with 3 years free servicing and 1 years free insurance, plus Aygo depreciates less than Peugeot or Citroen equivalent. ( although I suspect starting price is a little higher) We've got one on order as 2nd car as we decided to be totally sensible for a change and get the cheapest car to run ( which it is, according to What Car) On that sort of deal, apart from petrol, of which it uses very little, running costs should be minimal and budgetting easy.
Kia Rio - Pugugly {P}
What about the Rio's passive safety - could that be an issue ?
Kia Rio - jase1
What about the Rio's passive safety - could that be an
issue ?


Yes, this is an issue with the original Rio. The new one of course is a respectable 4-star so no problem there, but the old one, although never tested in Europe, was rated very poorly in US tests so that is a weak point. However the 2000- Accent is not as bad as most believe -- it was given 5 stars in the US, and while their rating system isn't as stringent as ours, it does mean that the Accent must be equivalent to around 4 stars here as well.
Kia Rio - Pugugly {P}
It's a no brainer then especially carrying one's kids.
Kia Rio - jase1
Here's the result of the 2005 Kia Rio test (this car is the same as the one sold here from 2002, it's the saloon version but I can't see that making too much difference):

www.nhtsa.dot.gov/NCAP/Cars/3348.html

Not quite as bad as I had thought; the frontal tests are reasonable, it's the side impact that's poor. Still not really recommended though.

Kia Rio - jase1
I have to say though that the US NCAP figures make for some interesting reading.

For example, the 5-star Ford Focus, although it does well in general in both the US and Euro NCAP studies, is flagged as having a serious safety concern (something which these Korean cars don't have).

There is a very serious risk of serious head injury for a rear passenger on a side impact on the new Focus. Yet we don't hear about this here.

I think that if you are concerned about safety on a particular vehicle, you should look at both sets of results (if the car is also sold in the US). For example, the 1997 VW Golf actually rates worse than the 2001 Kia Rio in the US survey.

If a particular car has either a poor overall rating *or* serious concerns in *either* test, this is something you need to be aware of.

On this basis, I'd think twice about buying a Focus as a family car!
Kia Rio - Adam {P}
>>Yet we don't hear about this here.<<

To be fair, that probably has something to do with the fact that he doesn't want a Focus so it'd be irrelevant.

I couldn't care less what safety rating a car has. I dont' know what mine is, Dad's is, Mum's is....all I know is that a lot of Renaults have 5 stars and RF's Laguna saved his life.

However, I realise some people care greatly about them and probably should - but stars aren't the be all and end all of safety. They measure one aspect. For what it's worth (nothing), I know someone who rolled an ST170, wrote it off, set all the airbags off, and was at my house having a drink later that day.
Kia Rio - Pugugly {P}
Defender then (joke)
Kia Rio - jase1
>>Yet we don't hear about this here.<<
To be fair, that probably has something to do with the
fact that he doesn't want a Focus so it'd be irrelevant.



I was only referring to the fact that we don't hear about such warnings in the UK _in general_.

TBH the best safety feature you can have in a car is a switched-on brain controlling it. But as the issue of safety was brought up, I think it is a mistake to rely solely on Euro-NCAP when researching safety. Similar bodies exist in the States, Aus, Japan etc etc and they do sometimes throw up conflicting results.

I agree about not being too reliant on star ratings. Very often, car manufacturers build cars to pass the tests, rather than building cars to be safe. If the test is perfect, that's fair enough, but the conflicting results thing is, I believe, down to say a Japanese car make which sells to the US designing the car to get 5 stars in the US, or a Euro company designing in a 5-star result on Euro-NCAP. It would be very interesting to see how Renault and others would do in the US tests.
Kia Rio - PW
Thanks all, Internets been palying up at home so couldnt read these over the weekend. The Carisma is on my list of possibles, but dont know if we could get one in budget- which has knocked the Focus out too.

Is bit tricky as Mrs PW has refused to go trawling round the dealers- but is now moaning as I am discussing this other people and not letting her decide. Think we've got the shortlist down to Rio, Accent, Almera Carisma, Cordoba or Astra (she saw a V reg one yesterday and said would be OK). Just depends on what comes up in budget now.

Luckily saw a couple of Rios and they have been approved, although will be thinking about the comments about safety. The only thing is, any major journeys with the kids will be in my car- and I would guess a Rio would still be an improvement over an M reg Fiesta.

Once again many thanks to all for the comments.
Kia Rio - jase1
To be honest I'd add the Escort (as long as it's a Zetec engine), Xsara and Skoda Felicia to that list as well if you are looking into bargain bangers (maybe even the Daewoo Lanos). Condition is everything though, just keep your options open.
Kia Rio - PW
Cheers Jase. Must have anticipated you on that as just been looking at Xsaras. Felicia would be a good one too. Fortunately shes not too much of a badge snob so has said would be happy with that.
Kia Rio - daveyjp
Aygo's are currently being offered with 3 years free servicing and
1 years free insurance>>


The offer appears to be tied to an expensive PCP deal, so it's not strictly 'free'. Did you have to sign up for this offer, will they budge on the PCP APR (9.8%!) will they offer the same deal regardless of payment?

A loan can be had for almost half the APR of the PCP deal. Offer does run until the end of the year so fits in with our timetable. What is the waiting time on a new one?
Kia Rio - lordwoody
There's no such thing as 'free' really, I'd be the first to admit that! They offered us the deal however we paid with very little prompting. We were originally looking at ordinary finance as opposed to PCP and the deal was on offer with that, at a lower interest rate. We did enquire about PCP and it was admitted that the interest rate was higher but we were told this was normal for PCP. Don't know how true this was as we were advised to lease by our accountant so we've now ordered one on a lease deal, which includes maintenance.
We were told 4 to 5 weeks maximum, possibly a little less, for delivery.