If you're feeling brave, why not do a mock driving theory test.
www.dsa.gov.uk/mockpaper/theoryintro.htm
|
|
28. Whoops.
|
|
31, would not recognise prolonged high speed as a reason to over inlate my tyres.
|
31, hehe. if you followed all that stuff in the Philippines you'd spend the rest of your life stuck in a side turning trying to get out.....
|
|
33 - but I only took the test 2 years ago.
|
|
|
|
it's only a few weeks since we did this one -
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?v=e&t=23...0
|
32 - did I do OK?!!!
Cheers, SS
|
|
|
|
Did it for real not so long ago, and got 34.
Well, I got 34 twice, as the first time, I failed the hazard perception test. Tut Tut
|
Very Interesting questions!
33 - not bad?, I took my test in 1988
number_cruncher
|
I got them all right when it mattered... smug Pologirl.
Mind you, that was in the days when you coloured in little boxes in pencil, and before the days of the "just hit as many places on the screen as you can, as fast as you can" hazard perception test.
|
>>Mind you, that was in the days when you coloured in little boxes in pencil, and before the days of the "just hit as many places on the screen as you can, as fast as you can" hazard perception test.<<
Worked for me!
I did mine before the hazard perception test was introduced which would seem that anyone who's ever owned a Playstation or any games console could pass; given that I know 3 people who have passed that but gotten something ridiculous like 18 out of 35.
Needless to say, I haven't taken the test today...or maybe I have and my score was too appaling to mention. No I didn't take it....honest...
--
Adam
|
32
Is the black background circular sign showing pedestrians and cycle in common use? I dont think that I have ever seen one!!!!
Got the tram question correct thro lugic and luck!
Repeat after me .... Do not let new pedestrians onto a crossing when amber is flashing!!!!!
Must refesh my knowledge of Toucans (pub - beer?)
pmh (was peter)
|
Never understand the sign about low flying motorcycles.....
|
|
I got the pedestrian walking sign wrong. Looking at them again, and not to excuse my ignorance, they are very poorly designed: ambiguous, confusing, far from self-explanatory.
|
30
Couldn't see any indication of which I got wrong ~ where was it?
--
L'escargot by name, but not by nature.
|
Did test 2 just in case SWMBO did better!
35
Has anybody seen any signs with Black backgound? Must check highway code.
pmh (was peter)
|
29
If in a line of traffic with someone very close behind, I should pull over and wave them past - dream on!!!!
|
|
Thanks those tests are just what I needed as I have a PCV theory test on Monday It boosted my confidence as I scored 35 twice
|
30
Took my test in 1982 well before theory test were included. Reasonably happy. reckon I failed on those which were more airy fairy (pollution etc) that rear driving issues.
Some q's remind me of the Florida Driving test I took in 1981. Some stupid potential answers. If you ticked one of those I think you got automatically disqualified!
--
Espada III - well if you have a family and need a Lamborghini, what else do you drive?
|
|
You should try the ADI test - thats 100 questions!! As for the hazard perception test, thats in a different league completely.
|
|
|
|
