If, as you say, they aren't expensive to main, how much do they cost on average (not the lowest), to service over the 5 - 6 year cycle of services? My point was that they would cost far more to service and run (petrol, insurance) than the OP's Fiesta by some margin - yes, they might be fine in that no major parts would fail over the next few years, but they may not.
With a car you haven't owned before, you can never be 100% sure that it is great condition, not can anyone guarantee it will be fault-free for another X years, hence why I suggested the OP budget for at least one major failure in the next 3 years.
I've just spent nigh on £600 having my 10+yo Mazda3's clutch changed (only £30 cheaper at the local indpendent) and have twice spent about £400 getting suspension bushes/arms etc changed over the past 3 years (I'm sure this was partly due to the amount of driving over speed humps) - surely having similar (at least) done on a Lexus would be more expensive? Has this sort of replacement been carried out, or is yet to come?
Owning/running a Lexus is, I am certain, far cheaper than for a BMW, Mercedes or Audi, but the OP should be comparing running costs to their Fiesta if that's what can afford to run - I assume so, otherwise why look at an old car priced at less than half the cost of a new Fiesta? People who buy upmarket cars should expect (compared to a more 'standard' model like the Fiesta of my car) to pay upmarket costs in running it.
30mpg (combined) or 35mpg (mostly out-of-town driving) isn't that great when a Fiesta can probably do mid 40s minimum and probably nearer to 50mpg average.
Given a greater salary, I would've considered buying a new IS back in 2006 when I bought my Mazda3 from new, as the IS is very reliable, but only if I had enough money per month to run it. All too often (including some recent other threads on this website), people get sucked into buying older 'premium'/luxury cars for the same price as a newer more basic one, but which they don't have the finances to run.
My point is that this always has to be considered, and we cannot assume the best by saying it 'won't go wrong' - for the same reason why so many people end up losing their homes because they spent all their money buying it and not having enough left over/put aside for upkeep.
|