VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

Whilst it appears to be a feature on many a German car, the stinginess of their equipment across the range is particularly apparent on the Golf - no climate controlled A/C as standard except on the GTi or R. Most equivalent models from other makes have that feature on at least one model below the 'sports' models in their ranges (e.g. the GT and Match models), wherby customers don't have to fork out another £500+ to 'upgrade' from standard A/C on an already expensive car.

A shame, as I quite like the latest Golf 1.4 TSi GT 3-door, getting back to the original Golf GTi without the huge insurance outlay of the current model.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - skidpan

When I bought the Seat Leon I originally looked at the Golf having owned 3 previously. The Golf was simply too expensive for its spec but the Leon was another matter. Identical mechanically (except the Golf has theoretically better IRS) yet better equipped and it cost me £5000 less. If I had spent another £2000 on the next Leon up the spec would have been even better but I did not need the extra's.

All this for a 1.4 TSi.

Why people buy the Golf is now beyond me.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

I too really like the Leon (3dr equivalent as well as the Golf) - I prefer the dash of the Golf (only with the 'gloss piano black' background rather than 'brushed aluminium') over the Leon (not bad though), though of the two I prefer the Leon seats (for the cloth patterns - I'm not a fan of the Golf's GT/GTi 'tartan') and exterior styling (the Golf being still good), as well as the lower price (which to me matters just as much as I [as long as they are reliable] normally intend to keep my cars until they are 10 years old). I actually prefer both over the sibbling Audi A3 which for me is way, way overpriced for what it is.

I still remain skeptical about SEAT dealers (my sister owned two Ibizas about 10 years ago and had below average ownership experiences with two different dealers) and more generally with VAG engineering over the top Japanese makes, though I hope (given none of the current Japanese cars feels right for me at the moment) that things improve, hopefully sooner rather than later.

What's the annual servicing costs for the Leon like? I'm currently paying an average (over the 6 year 'cycle of services) of £250 per 12,500 miles/1 year for my Mazda3 1.6 petrol. I suspect insurance costs for the Leon SC 1.4 TSi FR (my preferred model, equivalent to the Golf GT) would be probably about 25% higher than my Mazda as its a higher performance/specced car. What real-life mpg do you get (for your style of driving)?

I've seen both the 3dr Golf and Leon SCs locally (a very nice red Leon SC FR being owned by a friend of a neighbour) and both look very nice, better than the new Mazda 2 & 3 which I might consider. At least the Mazda comes with (like mine) full climate-controlled A/C on the SE-L models so I don't have to buy the expensive Sport ones with the rock-hard ride on bling-bling wheels.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - skidpan

which to me matters just as much as I [as long as they are reliable] normally intend to keep my cars until they are 10 years old).

So far the Leon has been 100% reliable over the 2 years + we have had it. No niggles whatsover. Just 2 services.

I still remain skeptical about SEAT dealers

Got to admit the selling dealer turned out to be a useless creature but Seat customer services sorted out his mistakes plus I got £200 compensation. At the first service an alternative dealer left the sump lug loose which resulted in a minor oil slick on the drive but luckily no engine damage, it could have been catastrophic. At the 2nd service we used another local dealer and all was perfect, just as it should be.

What's the annual servicing costs for the Leon like? I'm currently paying an average (over the 6 year 'cycle of services) of £250 per 12,500 miles/1 year for my Mazda3 1.6 petrol.

I pay £11 a month for 34 months for the first 3 services, total £374 or £125 a year. After that its £149 for a minor and £259 for a major, seems reasonable to me. Book online and the prices include 1 years AA roadside assistance.

I suspect insurance costs for the Leon SC 1.4 TSi FR (my preferred model, equivalent to the Golf GT) would be probably about 25% higher than my Mazda as its a higher performance/specced car.

Mine is the 1.4 140 PS model, pay £225 a year.

What real-life mpg do you get (for your style of driving)?

Over the 2 + years in mixed motoring its averaged 45 mpg. Seen 53 mpg on a coast run. Off the Scotland in it in September, will be interesting to see what we get over 1000+ miles in a week.

I've seen both the 3dr Golf and Leon SCs locally (a very nice red Leon SC FR being owned by a friend of a neighbour) and both look very nice, better than the new Mazda 2 & 3 which I might consider.

Drove the Mazda 3 with the 2.0 petrol. Expected it to be really good looking at the figures, in real life it was a real disapointment. No low down torque, felt like a slug compared to the Leon unless you thrashed it.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Happy Blue!

".....Drove the Mazda 3 with the 2.0 petrol. Expected it to be really good looking at the figures, in real life it was a real disapointment. No low down torque, felt like a slug compared to the Leon unless you thrashed it....."

Funny how we have all got used to the torque of turbocharged engines, so that even a good sized and powerful engine in a modest car feels sluggish.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

Thanks for the information - if I (eventually) do decide to go for the Leon, I'll just have to keep m fingers crossed that the dealer is OK. Reviews for the new Mazda3 have generally been good, but like you have criticised the lack of low-down torque (a 'feature' of many a modern non-turbo petrol, especially Japanese cars [including mine] with VVT type technology).

I had hoped that the introduction of a de-rated 2 litre petrol engine to effectively replace the existing 1.6 would've given better low-down torque and smooth acceleration without the need to thrash the nuts of it (as I have to do sometimes), but it appears it still runs out of puff quite quickly despite it being better than before. The 'high-powered' version (165bhp) seems to be the equivalent (at a lower output) of what Honda did with their 2ltr engine in the Civic when the Type R was introduced - not much more torque, but an increase in power but at very high revs. I would prefer not to have to thrash it for overtakes, etc.

I'll still go for a test drive on all of them though to at least be able to compare what's on offer. Let's hope by then the VW has a bit more 'standard kit' on for the money to properly compare it to the others, though I'm not holding my breath.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - concrete

Hello Andy, I didn't see you refer to Skoda. The Octavia is a really nice car. My brother in law has just bought a new model. Very smart and the VRS goes like the proverbial off a shovel! I know it doesn't have the Golf image but image isn't everything. Head over heart, dear boy!!

Check it out. My present Skoda is the best car I have ever had apart from the Honda Accord, and that is saying something after 48 years driving and owning.

Best of luck in your choice.

Cheers Concrete

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

For me, the Octavia (not that I've driven one, though been driven in a mk1) was very good value for money, but just too big for my needs (parking not being my strongest suit), which is why I'm steering towards (pardon the pun) smaller cars than my current Mazda3 mk1 saloon (which, with its high boot line and overhang is quite difficult to park), probably going back to hatchbacks.

So many cars these have such poor rear visibility that having parking sensors is almost a must - maybe I was lucky with my old car (1996 Nissan Micra) which was so easy to park and had great all-round visibility.

Anyway, going back to my current issue, the Fabia is more of the size that I would be looking for, but am just not keen on the looks and ride/handling. The Leon SC and Golf 3dr in particular have a large boot (380 ltr) for their size (same as the 5dr versions), which is not too much less than my car's 410 or so litres, especially when you factor in my car's small boot aperture and unuseable areas due to the fixed top of the boot.

The car is only for me and really only needs enough room in the back for occasionally adult passengers, which is why (as well as the better looks and lower price) the 3dr versions of the Golf and Leon appeal to me. I was also (in my now 'mid-life crisis' age range) thinking of going a bit more up-market in interior quality and performance, as long as I could do so without having to endure the obligatory rock-hard ride on 18in rims that seems to come with 'warm' hatches and coupes these days.

Comfort, reliability, nice to look at and a bit of poke, at a reasonable price - is that too much to ask (probably!)?

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Avant

I know that SKODA is popularly supposed to stand for Some Kind Of Downmarket Audi - but I've yet to meet anyone who thinks that modern Skodas are sheds. I've had more approving comments on my choice of car since I've had Skodas than I ever did when I had an Audi.

It's getting difficult to see whay one would choose a Golf rather than one of its equivalents in the VW Group. SEATs and Skodas have items like dual climate control on more models than VWs; and if you do want the upmarket image, the Audi A3 costs very little more than the corresponding Golf - and it has climate control on Sport models upwards.

And it's worth mentioning that SEAT. Skoda and Audi include 3 years' breakdown cover in their warranties, VW only one.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - concrete

Hear1 Hear! Avant. Very well put. Image and cache are nice concepts but are no substitute for a satisfactory deal on an excellent car.

I was going today to look over a Yeti and an Octavia, but the thunderstorms have put SWMBO and I off going out. We don't want to leave our pooch who is shaking like a leaf with all the thunder and lightning.

Cheers Concrete

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - 72 dudes

Isn't the aircon on the lower model Golfs still known as "Climactic"? i.e. semi climate controlled, in that it can maintain a set temperature but does not automatically direct airflow or control fan speed.

Sort of a half way house betwenn aircon and climate control.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - skidpan

Isn't the aircon on the lower model Golfs still known as "Climactic"? i.e. semi climate controlled, in that it can maintain a set temperature but does not automatically direct airflow or control fan speed.

Sort of a half way house betwenn aircon and climate control.

All VW have done is paint temp figures on the dash around the knob instead of the usual blue to red indicator. Does not maintain a set temp at all, its just a con.

If you want Climate Control you have to pay quite a bit extra even on the op models.

As for Skoda's we have looked at them on 4 occations now and come away unimpressed.

The first time was in 2002 and the car was the Octavia. The rear seat space was very poor but in fairness the boot was huge. The salesman at our local dealer was quite abrupt with the wife when she wanted to measure the legroom. Never drove it. Bought a pre reg Mondeo.

Then in 2010 we looked at the Octavia estate. Went to the dealer we visited 8 years previously, nice new showroom but the saleman was hopeless. Could not be bothered to show us a car of the spec we were interested in and never phoned us to tell us they had actually got one. Tried another dealer who was actually very good but the first one we drove had incredible road noise, on the motorway it was hurting the wifes ears. Drove a second which was better but still poor compared to the C-Max we had at the time. Bought a Kia Ceed SW.

In 2013 we had a quick look at the Octavia when we bought the Leon. Great value for the space but the quality of the interior and equipment list was way below that of the Leon.

Last month we looked at the Fabia. Considering the great press reports the car gets we were very disapointed. Poor rear seat space, the tailgate was so high the wife could not reach it to close and shocking interior plastics were enough to persuade us to walk. Bought a Note for less. Better spec and quicker than the Polo we drove with the same engine as the Fabia.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - daveyK_UK

I have got to agree, the new Fabia is nothing special.

I'm struggling to understand why the motoring press are giving it such a positive write up, it doesn't excel in any area and the one area it should excel in is price/value, with a high list price and little to no discounts available it looks incredibly expensive.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - davecooper
It's interesting that, in our area and I would imagine nationally, VW are offering big discounts and incentives on the Golf. It also seems these are exclusively for the higher end models.
VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

It seems (I think this is common across all manufacturers these days) the offers are only in conjunction with taking out PCP deals, which always works out more expensive than buying with cash. To me, they're hooks for people who can't really afford to buy said car. You'd think they would've learned their lesson following the credit crunch.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - skidpan

the offers are only in conjunction with taking out PCP deals, which always works out more expensive than buying with cash.

When we bought the Nissan Note recently I tried various brokers and local dealers for cash deals plus brokers and local dealers for manufacturers offers involving PCP's.

Best cash deal on a car retailing at about £15800 I could find was about £13700.

The deal we settled on with a local dealer was about £12100 including 3 years servicing on a 3 year PCP. If we let the PCP run to the end it will cost us £13400 (less than the cash price) but if we pay the PCP off early (which we probably will) we will pay considerably less. At a guess if we pay off after a year it will cost us about £12600 all in.

If I add 3 services onto the cash deal it would be about £14200.

So why pay cash.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

Just wondering how the company can either a) make any money on the PCP deal if its lower than the cash price + normal servicing of the car, or b) how they can justify effectively subsidising the PCP deals at the expense of cash buyers and existing customers paying for servicing?

They are effectively saying that the list price of cars are greatly over-inflated (just like RRPs for items now sold on the internet for far less). We need effective competition so people can choose the right type of deal for them - not get sucked into potentially expensive finance deals (if they, say, change jobs after buying a car on finance to one that requires them to do a great deal of mileage [which happens to a lot of people, including myself]) because the car manufacturers deliberately inflate cash prices to deter anyone other than a cash-rich OAP who doesn't want the hassle.

Every other thing I can think of that you buy using cash/banker's draught is always cheaper than buying on credit as there's no mucking about with credit checks, forms, speaking with staff, etc. I would welcome back a car equivalent to Aldi (like Daewoo were, but better quality) that offers both good looking/drive/quality fit & finish and engineered cars at a reasonable price (inclduing servicing) that you don't endlessly have to go through hoops just to buy and own. Essentially the difference between makes would be how good their cars and servicing/customer service would be, and not pretending to offer jam today with a sting in the tail for changed circumstances and no other option.

In my view, the blantant promotion of PCPsto the detriment of other type of deal, especially cash, is removing choice from the car buying/ownership experience.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - bazza

About 70% of new cars are bought on finance so I've read. Most folk don't have the money to buy cash so don't need to do the sums like Skidpan's done. They just want a new car on the drive for a monthly amount they think they can afford. But I know of two buyers who wanted out of a PCP deal for various reasons early on. Neither managed it. They're not for everyone but they do seem to suit a lot of people. But it's not cheap motoring for sure, although not everyone- I admit-- looks at it like I do. I can't see the sense in being kept on the steep part of the depreciation curve indefinitely, as it seems most buyers go round agaain after 2 or 3 years.

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - daveyK_UK

When biting brand new finance seems to have a Vetter leverage in most cases over cash.

When it comes to buying pre reg, cash is always king

VW Golf - Stingy equipment list - Engineer Andy

A shame really, as most second-hand models I was looking at (for reference) for the Golf (other than the GTi and R) only had the lower-spec standard A/C, and not climate controlled A/C, hence why (unless I was very lucky to find a GT or Match with the exact spec I wanted) I was thinking only brand new was my only option and was miffed at the high extra cost on an already above-average price.

I wouldn't mind buying a pre-reg (effectively that's what my Mazda is when I bought it from Motorpoint in 2006 [17 miles on the clock]) if the spec and price was right. Maybe I'll be lucky.