I have various concerns re the refuse vehicle driver in the Glasgow fatalities.
but
Re the 16 year old girl fatality, ring in the nose is a dead giveaway, generally linked to permenantly worn earphones, with the volume turned up loud.
From direct personal local observations of the students attending a local college of furthur education.
Or, I suppose, what I am trying to say is, why was she attempting to cross the road through fast moving traffic?
And what control measures had she put in place to make her attempted road crossing more survivable?
Pedestrians, in the first instance, have also got a responsibility for their own wellbeing, the Motorist cannot always be held 100% responsible, or perhaps responsible at all?
Infants should be under the charge of a responsible adult, children should be educated or learn to cross a road safely, and with courtsey to all other road users, and one kinda assumes/presumes adults should know better.
Perhaps we need a walking test for pedestrians.
marcus
Edited by DirtyDieselDogg on 24/07/2015 at 08:23
|