n/a - The ton - Andrew-T

No, not doing 100mph. But it seems that the world as we know it has been metricated a little more, by stealth. The good old English ton has been completely replaced by the metric tonne in everything I read or see on TV these days. This is fine in many contexts but there is still a valid use for the 2240-pound unit instead of the 1000-kilo one. Who has brought this about, and why?

n/a - The ton - gordonbennet

We, the electorate, have.

We voted in our millions for our country to be given away by fools and traitors, some of whom were made rich beyond wildest dreams.

Whilst hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of good men and women lie in graves the world over, killed long before their time defending this once fine country and it's allies from all foes, God rest them for they must turn in their graves at what has happened in the last 40 years, and especially more recently.

Anyone who raised an objection was vilified by one of the biggest propaganda machines the world has ever seen.

The answer may lie in the mirror.

n/a - The ton - Vitesse6

What complete t*** and an insult to the many people in this country who see that our future lies within Europe, not sidelined as a minor bit part player run by a bunch of buffoons.

n/a - The ton - Leif

What complete t*** and an insult to the many people in this country who see that our future lies within Europe, not sidelined as a minor bit part player run by a bunch of buffoons.

I've never understood how surrendering control over our borders, legal system, and society makes us anything other than weaker. Europe is damaging its position in the world with its bureacracy and idealism. Greece is the perfect example of reality not matching the idealism, thanks to blatant dishonesty and tax evasion.

n/a - The ton - Bromptonaut

I've never understood how surrendering control over our borders, legal system, and society makes us anything other than weaker. Europe is damaging its position in the world with its bureacracy and idealism. Greece is the perfect example of reality not matching the idealism, thanks to blatant dishonesty and tax evasion.

I get the bureacracy bit, nobody's pretending the EU is ideal; bits of it desperately need reform.

What I don't get is the surrendering control stuff.

We have a reciprocal arrangement for free movement of people and goods; a sharin of a small amount of sovereignty. How on earth would modern trade work if mainland Europe retained all it's border rossings with checks and duty differences etc?

Our legal system remains our own. We have our own courts and tribunals and an adversarial system completely at odds with those of say France or Germany. OK we're signatories to the Human Rights Convention which in reality gives us in UK some sort of a proxy for a written constitution. But the vast majority of our legislation is domestic only. What in the last four Queen's Speeches was determined by Europe?

There are a handful of egregious examples of bad behaviour by EU folks resident here and a few more we'd exclude in an ideal world. But again do we want to surrender our right to work and travel in other countries without let or hindrance? Cos that's the choice.

Edited by Bromptonaut on 06/01/2015 at 22:54

n/a - The ton - Sofa Spud

We voted in our millions for our country to be given away by fools and traitors, some of whom were made rich beyond wildest dreams.

There's no British owned motor industry left and a lot of us are happy to drive round in products of VW Audi Group, Daimler Benz, BMW, Peugeot Group, Renault, Fiat etc. A significant proportion of our rail services are run by companies owned by the German and Dutch governments, while a lot of our electricity generation and supply is in the hands of EDF, a French state-owned corporation. And over the last couple of years more and more of us have decided to shop at Lidl and Aldi, both German.

We depend so much on a multitude of European companies for our basic lifestyle needs nowadays that it's surely better to be an active partipant in the wider entity that includes them than to sit outside it complaining to deaf ears.

n/a - The ton - brum

. Who has brought this about, and why?

On 20 May 1875 an international treaty known as the Convention du Metre was signed by 17 states.

On 17 September 1884, the British Government signed the convention on behalf of the United Kingdom. The number grew to 21 in 1900, 32 in 1950, and 49 in 2001. As of 7 August 2013, there are 55 Member States and 38 Associate States and Economies of the General Conference.

So dont complain you didnt see this one coming......

I think the "system" has something to do with people apparently having ten fingers....

n/a - The ton - jc2

Long ton=2240lbs

Short ton=2000lbs

Metric ton(tonne)=2204lbs.

n/a - The ton - Bromptonaut

What on earth is the currently valid use of the ton, whether long or short, except in a historical context?

Nobody much under 55 is likely to have met anything other than the 1000kg tonne. Much as I like by beer in pints and my distance/speed in miles I can't see much case for retainining ounces, pounds etc. Or for that matter feet and inches when it comes to a car's dimensions.

Edited by Bromptonaut on 06/01/2015 at 19:22

n/a - The ton - RT

The international standards are metric, the UK is part of the EU which defines metric as it's standard. The UK operates an official dual standard system - typical British fudge of not changing any more than we have to.

The adoption of tonne instead of ton was almost invisible because they're almost the same and for many purposes interchangeable.

Being of an age when schools taught both systems I can still cope with metric or Imperial - or indeed a strange mixture of the two as I buy fuel in litres but express consumption in both miles/gallon and miles/litre - I buy beer in pints but know that a unit of alcohol is 10ml at 100%.

n/a - The ton - bathtub tom

It's a difference of less than 2%.

Do we really care?

I had to convert from Imperial to metric (SI) units a t college in the '60s. I can still convert most units in my head (BTU, PSI and ft/lb an exception).

n/a - The ton - Andrew-T

Agreed that the difference is only 36 pounds in 2240, which makes it almost unnecessary to change the spelling. I have no objection to using tonnes where metric units are intended. But I do object where Imperial units are intended or implied, such as old ships' tonnages for example. People using terms of measurement should take the trouble to use the correct ones.

n/a - The ton - Andrew-T

Much as I like by beer in pints and my distance/speed in miles I can't see much case for retainining ounces, pounds etc. Or for that matter feet and inches when it comes to a car's dimensions.

Then let's all get modern and stop using MPG as we haven't bought a gallon of anything for decades ? :-)

n/a - The ton - NARU

Much as I like by beer in pints and my distance/speed in miles I can't see much case for retainining ounces, pounds etc. Or for that matter feet and inches when it comes to a car's dimensions.

Then let's all get modern and stop using MPG as we haven't bought a gallon of anything for decades ? :-)

I don't use MPG any more. I use a strange hybrid - MPL. My 4x4 does about 6 MPL.

If I could easily move to kilometers I would.

n/a - The ton - NARU

I'm in my 50s and use SI units by default. maybe it's time to get with the programme! more sensible, easier to use.

n/a - The ton - piggy

Anyone who has to use weights and measures in their daily life as i had to before retiring will be thankfull for the metric system. In the early seventies I had to calculate daily feed consumption and dilution rates in the old imperial system. Tons,quarters and pounds,2% of a fluid ounce anyone? No thanks! Nowadays all vaccine and disinfectant dilution rates are in metric,so simple it`s possible to work out without a calculator even. All the skilled craftsmen I know use metric;wood and steel is sold in metric. Hankering after a system which was introduced by the Romans is ridiculous and has no bearing whatsoever on Britain`s intergration or otherwise into a "Greater Europe". While we`re at why not go back to bushels,roods and chains.

n/a - The ton - Leif
Bring back the furlong, the bushel, the florin, and other glorious units. Or maybe not.

Metric is far more sensible being a decimal system. We should take from Europe all that is good.
n/a - The ton - Avant

Strange, isn't it, that for as long as I can remember (born 1948) we've happily measured a car's engine size in cubic cemtimetres or litres - no doubt because industry went metric long before individuals did.

Many of my generation are a bit of a mixture: we accepted decimal currency without much fuss, but we still like our miles and pints, and I have to admit being glad that I can change the temperature measurement in my Octavia to degrees Fahrenheit.

(Dr. Fahrenheit died at 50 - but he thought he was 122.) :)

n/a - The ton - RT

Even ex-Colonials are gradually converting - American engines are now in litres not cubic inches, radial tyres have always been metric width, Canadians and Australians use kilometres not miles.

The big difficulty going fully metric with cars is getting battery voltage down to 10v - even the EU will struggle with that.

n/a - The ton - NARU

The big difficulty going fully metric with cars is getting battery voltage down to 10v - even the EU will struggle with that.

You just put 5 cells in them instead of 6! :-)

(Surely a battery containing 'half a dozen cells' should have been banned by now!)

Edited by Marlot on 07/01/2015 at 05:28

n/a - The ton - skidpan

When I began working in industry in 1975 we measured distances in metres and measured weights in metric tonnes.

Hardly news to me.

n/a - The ton - Brit_in_Germany

As far as I am aware, tyres are still sized in inches though, even on the Continent. As are pipe connections for no fathomable reason.

n/a - The ton - RT

As far as I am aware, tyres are still sized in inches though, even on the Continent. As are pipe connections for no fathomable reason.

Rim diameters and cross-ply widths are inches, radial widths are metric.

n/a - The ton - skidpan

As are pipe connections for no fathomable reason.

Pipe connections tend to vary with the type of pipe and origin.

Copper is metric, has been for years. 15mm, 22mm, 28mm etc.

n/a - The ton - Vitesse6

Pipe connections in France are British Standard Pipe thread so are an imperial measurement.

Their water pipes however are metric 14 or 16mm which is a pain for an expat with some 15mm fittings!!

n/a - The ton - Andrew-T

Strange, isn't it, that for as long as I can remember (born 1948) we've happily measured a car's engine size in cubic cemtimetres or litres - no doubt because industry went metric long before individuals did.

The Americans haven't, or at least they hadn't the last time I looked. They are more Imperial than we are, measuring some quantities in pounds when tons would seem more logical. Their gallons aren't even the right size. And those barrels of oil ....

About 30 years back the Yanks and Canadians were all set up to convert to metric road distances, then the Yanks chickened out at the last minute leaving Canada on their own. Typical (I speak as an ex-resident of Canada).

n/a - The ton - SlidingPillar

I must be one of the last to have been taught 100% imperial units at junior school. So much so, I was expected to have been taught metric when I got to secondary school.

Not dificult though and I avoided decametres nicely (decametres are largely for the benefit of teachers anyway). I tend to use both systems, and as one car was made in 1930, metric components on that are very few, four coachbolts and four threads and domenuts - everything else is imperial.

n/a - The ton - skidpan

My Caterham is a mixture of metric and imperial fastners. Not an issue to me since I understand the difference but many owners have damaged parts assembling them using the wrong product.

Mine has what is referred to as an "Imperial Chassis". Basically that means that all the bolts that attach components directly to it should have Imperial threads but even then there are a few exceptions. The lower diff mouting bolts are specials having a 10mm thread and a 1/2" shank and the bolt for the gearbox rubber is also 10mm thread. All the suspension mounting bolts are metric.

On my current car all the bolts that attach the rear suspension are imperial but all the bolts related to Ford Sierra brake and diff componets are metric as are all the bolts in the gearbox (Sierra again). The current engine is a Zetec and is all metric again.

The front uprights and original brakes are directly related to the Triumph Spitfire parts thus have imperial fastners. The uprated brakes now on the car are a mixture of imperial and metric.

The original engine was a Ford X-Flow and that was mostly UNC externally with mostly UNF internally to add to the confusion. All Mk1 and 2 Escort 1100, 1300 and 1600's had metric gearboxes with imperial axles and engines.

Just to add to the confusion Mr Ford uses metric fine thread in some locations.

n/a - The ton - RT

I did once do an engine rebuilt on a Fiat using only Imperial tools - torqued-up by "feel" - it ran much better after!

n/a - The ton - bathtub tom

Had a Maestro diesel. IIRC imperial body fixings but the Perkins diesel and VW gearbox weren't.

n/a - The ton - Sofa Spud

I've never understood why we didn't adopt full metrication years ago. The Ordnance Survey went fully metric in the 1970's, when their one inch to the mile maps were repaced by two centimetre to the kilometre, in the belief that we would soon adopt metrication.

However, it's recently been announced that Network Rail will convert to the kilometre and kph* in preparation for new signalling and safety systems. In the 19th century the railways gave us standardised time, so maybe they will also provide the lead in our final move to metrication. But also perhaps there's something generational. Young people I know seem to think in metric, so full metrication in Britain is only a matter of time.

Re 'tonnes' - the road haulage industry was using tonnes as far back as the mid 1970's, although you had to be careful as some weighbridges were imperial and some were metric and the difference between the tonne and ton, though small, was enough to put your vehicle over-weight or, the other way about, to earn you a telling-off from the boss for not carrying enough.

* www.railnews.co.uk/news/2013/10/01-end-of-the-line...l

Edited by Sofa Spud on 08/01/2015 at 10:22

n/a - The ton - RT

Railways are going fully metric because everything is built in metric countries and most of the franchises are foreign owned - and the cost to change isn't that high.

The cost to change UK roads and vehicles would be humungous - and the benefit value about zero. It would be change for principles sake.

n/a - The ton - SlidingPillar

And the pseudo Greens and Safety folk would wet their pants if they had to say 32.1869 kmh is plenty. (I am aware they'd round it down to 30kmh, and probably hail that as an improvement too).

n/a - The ton - Sofa Spud

The cost to change UK roads and vehicles would be humungous - and the benefit value about zero. It would be change for principles sake.

It's not going to happen any time soon, I agree, but I think it will eventually. Other countries have made the change. Most vehicles have speedos that are marked in mph and kph and some that have digital speedos can be set to read in either. The only big change would be to speed limit signs.

All heavy lorries here are already fitted with metric speed limiters that limit them to 90 kph (56 mph).

Anyway, in a few years time new cars will probably be fitted with 'smart' speed limiters that automatically keep them within any speed limits - courtesy of GPS, Google Earth etc.

Edited by Sofa Spud on 08/01/2015 at 20:40

n/a - The ton - Andrew-T

Railways are going fully metric because everything is built in metric countries and most of the franchises are foreign owned - and the cost to change isn't that high.

The cost to change UK roads and vehicles would be humungous - and the benefit value about zero. It would be change for principles sake.

I hope to G*d they don't metricate the track gauge - the cost of that would also be humungous. Anyone for an HS2 with a 1.5-metre gauge?

n/a - The ton - Hamsafar

People all over the world still by TV screens by the inch.

Weird isn't it.

n/a - The ton - RT

I hope to G*d they don't metricate the track gauge - the cost of that would also be humungous. Anyone for an HS2 with a 1.5-metre gauge?

International standard railway gauge has been metricated at 1435 mm for a long time - only the US and Canada still use 4 ft 8.5 in (1435.1 mm)

n/a - The ton - MrDanno

I hope to G*d they don't metricate the track gauge - the cost of that would also be humungous. Anyone for an HS2 with a 1.5-metre gauge?

International standard railway gauge has been metricated at 1435 mm for a long time - only the US and Canada still use 4 ft 8.5 in (1435.1 mm)

Here in Russia they use the old 5 ft gauge but, they have now adjusted it slightly to 15 20 mm. When trains cross the border to western Europe they raise them up and change the bogies to suit.

n/a - The ton - dieseldogg

As above (per Marlot?) I have started to "think" in miles per litre.

Since 4.54 litres per gallon

45mpg = 10 miles per litre

which is a good basline figure to work off.

PS

Not sure whether Russia still faffs about jacking up and changing bogies.

I "think" a comprimise was reached where all but high speed trains can work with a few mm spread of track gauges, only reasonable surely.

PS

Consult Wikipedia btw.

cheers

M

Edited by dieseldogg on 12/01/2015 at 17:01

n/a - The ton - Andrew-T

Not sure whether Russia still faffs about jacking up and changing bogies.

I "think" a comprimise was reached where all but high speed trains can work with a few mm spread of track gauges, only reasonable surely.

Something similar happens at the Spain/France border. I believe the bogies are adjustable for the few inches difference on the main line south. The Atlantic change south of Biarritz still involves a complete change of train (or did a few years ago).