RobJP - Are you currently working in oil testing then? That would add weight to your opinion.
Oh dear. You really don't get it, do you ?
Refer to my last post - particularly the last lines of it. If you want to do oil changes at 20k, or whatever mileage, then feel free to do so. However, it's not somewhere I'd want to be, I think it's asking for trouble.
I really have no interest if you (or other people) feel my argument/opinion has weight or not. I don't get any benefit from someone taking my words to heart. After all, if someone does follow that advice, and do an oil change every 10k or so, and gets no problems, then they're hardly likely to remember this thread in 5 years and post up thanking me, are they ?
It's entirely possible, I'm sure, for someone to run a car on 20k oil changes for 300k without problems, and I'm also pretty sure that you could follow 10k intervals and suffer catastrophic failures within 100k.
Just as some smokers are on 60 a day for 60 years, and get run over by a bus, but some might do 10 a day for a decade and get lung cancer.
However, the likelihood of problems happening is where I'm at, and (hopefully) saving someone from getting a shedload of grief in terms of engine failures.
I agree with what gordonbennet posted, when he said this :
BMW and others Diesels consumption of turbos and timing chains could, in my humble opinion be reduced considerably with sensible oil servicing, coupled with some equally unfashionable warm up cool down routines...
I'll go a step further. In my opinion, BMWs engineering is equal to any manufacturer, and far better than most. However, they have been let down by their own adoption of this stupid long service interval, which was done for the fleet market to reduce lease costs. VAG, Mercedes (and others) are equally as guilty.
Oh, and in answer to your question : no. I'm not currently working in oil testing. The company I'm with now is involved in geotechnical and extraction rather than the processing side
|