Audi lies about safety - dan86

m.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27392157

The above link is to a bbc report about hoe Audi dealers led customers to believe that all there cars are euro nap tested. Just goes to show you can't trust car salesmen.

I know not all car salesmen are unscrupulous and just out for your money but lying about the safety of the cars should be a big no no in my books. The customers cpuld of look up on the Internet of official literature to find the euro nap ratings but you would expect the main dealers to be knowledgeable about what they sell.

Audi lies about safety - oldroverboy.

. Just goes to show you can't trust car salesmen.

No you can't! "sales executives" are not interested in anything apart from their pay cheque at the end of the month, apart from a small minority who are usually employed in smaller family run busunesses.

I still hear people saying "you can definitely get 78.5 mpg out of you new car.

It is whatever it takes to get a sale. (slightly off topic, have you seen the reports in the telegraph about sky selling their contracts)

If it is for sale, (whatever it is) there will be a "con" attached.......................

Audi lies about safety - skidpan

When we bought our Kia in August 2010 the salesman told us Kia had just won the Monte Carlo Rally.

Being ever the sceptic I did some investigation, sounded a bit daft since it was August when we were in the showroom and the Monte takes place in January. Turned out that Kia had competed sucessfully in the Andros Trophy (ice racing) in the mid 2000's, they had won the title beating Alan Prost in his Toyota. But as is normal in motorsport the only "real" Kia part on the cars was probably the badge.

When I pointed this out to the saleman all he could manage was an off the cuff "well its the same thing".

Lying bar stewards one and all.

Audi lies about safety - coopshere
What I find more worrying is that not all cars are tested. In this day of unending Health and Safety legislation I had assumed that by now every car sold in the UK or Europe would have to be tested. This is clearly not the case so there could well be some real unsafe cars out there.
Audi lies about safety - thunderbird

I read some time ago that Volvo did not intend to have any new models NCAP tested in the future. They claim their cars are built well beyond the 5* standards and since this is not reflected in the results there is little point.

Audi lies about safety - daveyjp
Considering all Audis from A4 to A8 look the same, I reckon if you test the smallest the others will be equal or better!
Audi lies about safety - A3 A4

Isn't this a bit of a non story as the A5 is a coupe version of tha A4 and the A7 the same of an A6, both of which have been tested.

Had the coupe/cabrio just been called an A4 as it previously was, would there be a story? Was the old A4 Cabrio tested?

Audi lies about safety - Bromptonaut

Isn't this a bit of a non story as the A5 is a coupe version of tha A4 and the A7 the same of an A6, both of which have been tested.

Had the coupe/cabrio just been called an A4 as it previously was, would there be a story? Was the old A4 Cabrio tested?

But how do we know the coupe vesions would perform the same as the A4 or A6 in all segments of the test?

Audi lies about safety - Avant

As far as I know, NCAP are still not including rear visibility in their testing - a glaring omission. Some manufacturers let the stylist have his way and allow either a huge blind spot (Honda Civic) or a ridiculous narrowing of the glass area towards the back of the car (Volvo V40 and V60, Ford Fiesta, and Nissan Qashqai, where the new model is even worse than the old one).

Audi are pretty good in this respect, as are VW and Skoda, although SEAT are not so good.

This can be positively dangerous in situations such as reversing or joining a road from an oblique angle. I'd say this is a much more important issue than worrying because some Audis have been tested and some haven't. Is it really likely that they would go to the expense of designing several cars on the same basic platform so differently that the NCAP rating would vary between them?

I do agree that the dealers shouldn't misrepresent the position - no doubt this has happened because Audi hasn't briefed them properly.

Audi lies about safety - focussed

As far as I know, NCAP are still not including rear visibility in their testing - a glaring omission. Some manufacturers let the stylist have his way and allow either a huge blind spot (Honda Civic) or a ridiculous narrowing of the glass area towards the back of the car (Volvo V40 and V60, Ford Fiesta, and Nissan Qashqai, where the new model is even worse than the old one).

Audi are pretty good in this respect, as are VW and Skoda, although SEAT are not so good.

This can be positively dangerous in situations such as reversing or joining a road from an oblique angle. I'd say this is a much more important issue than worrying because some Audis have been tested and some haven't. Is it really likely that they would go to the expense of designing several cars on the same basic platform so differently that the NCAP rating would vary between them?

I do agree that the dealers shouldn't misrepresent the position - no doubt this has happened because Audi hasn't briefed them properly.

Oh dear - I have to disagree with Avant!

The Honda Civic- 8th generation-2006 on does not have a huge blind spot and does not cause problems with rear vision when reversing.

I've got one, had it since 2007, used to teach driving in it until I escaped from the UK in 2009. The last 19 pupils I taught all passed their driving tests in it first time, one of them with no driving faults at all.

Huge blind spot indeed!

Audi lies about safety - Bolt

I agree with focussed,I also have a Civic and have had no problem with rear view at all and is not dangerous.

I dont think its so much the style of a car thats the problem as the driver,I keep being told that some drivers have no idea how to reverse properly,some are women

I thought Audi said because one model had gone through NCAP they thought all their cars were fine,imo no two accidents are the same so all cars should go through the test

Audi lies about safety - coopshere
Another to disagree with Avant on the Civic. My wife, a mature lady and a nervous driver, had a 2009 model for about 18 months. She never complained about the rear view and always reversed into parking spots etc without a problem. I drove it several times without any problem, agreed that the rear view is limited compared to a conventional saloon or estate but dangerous, definitely not. Biggest problem with it is the ride quality.

To return to the OP, there is no way you can suggest that a similar model must be as good as one sharing the same platform unless it too has been tested to the same degree. Its not just about crumple zones, there are several differences such as bonnet level and interior fittings that could all have a different impact on safety.

Edited by coopshere on 16/05/2014 at 14:42

Audi lies about safety - daveyK_UK

agreed.

The biggest problem with the last 2 shape civics is not the styling nor the reduced rear visability, it has been the ride quality and its cost them customers.

I do hope when the new jazz comes next year, they dont make the same mistake.

Audi lies about safety - Trilogy

Just one * for all round visibility in the Civic 'Van'.

www.which.co.uk/cars/choosing-a-car/how-we-test-ca.../

forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=2293...9