Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

No. www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=47...0

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Wackyracer

There is only one thing wrong with that, It won't satisfy the number plate snobs who MUST have a new car to show off.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

There is only one thing wrong with that, It won't satisfy the number plate snobs who MUST have a new car to show off.

A cover plate will sort that out.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - jamie745

Pistonheads? Generally a rather unpleasant bunch from what I've seen of them.

Cars don't age as fast as they used to. In the 1980s, a 10 year old car was a bag of s***.

A friend of mine has an R reg Peugeot 406 which they bought brand new in 1997, they've still got it. It's a perfectly serviceable motorcar.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Andrew-T

Cars don't age as fast as they used to. In the 1980s, a 10 year old car was a bag of s***..

Possibly. In the early 1980s Peugeot (for one) solved the problem of preventing body corrosion - if their cars remained undamaged, they also remained rust-free. But it didn't make their owners want to keep them much longer than before. So these days fully intact 10-year-old cars are worth peanuts because hardly anyone wants them. They don't age, they just become unwanted - so why bother to rustproof them?

Daft.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - bazza

Jamie's right though, a 10 year old car back in the late 80s tended to be on its last legs rust-wise. I had several! Currently driving son's 10 year old Corolla and to be honest it drives perfectly, no rust, no major issues. I'm just about to overhaul the calipers as they're a bit sticky but this is 77000 miles and 10 UK winters later! If you're not a badge snob and don't mind some DIY, there are bargains to be had. The UK car market is controlled by the Company car, HP and PCP financial and tax structures. I think I read somewhere that 70% of all new cars on the road are financed, rather than purchased. That drives the 3 year change-over and perpetuates the myth that after 3 years it's a liability, better to have a new one, cheaper than fixing etc.......All of course suits the manufacturers to move more metal. And of course there's the status aspect which is alive and well!

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Bolt

A reason I come across with people that buy new cars is that they are convinced the car wont pass the emissions test on next MOT,as good as the car they have is,garages seems to be able to convince some that because the emissions test is tighter now, the car will cost a fortune to get through MOT

So they get rid,I heard WBAC.com is doing well,no one buying second hand around our way so people are selling to them

Do you really need a 21st century car? - 1litregolfeater

I agree

Do you really need a 21st century car? - mss1tw

I like his attitude,

I'm going to try and keep my simple old-tech Berlingo going for as long as possible, and have already rebuilt my 1998 Africa Twin from the chassis (Powder coated) upwards as there is NOTHING on offer from any manufacturer that does so much, so well, and only has the bare minimum of (Well made) electronics to get the reliablilty just right - CDI and that's it.

The reason for the Berlingo is that as long as they don't retroactively change the emissions regs, it should always get through an MOT, and as it's so basic hopefully not much essential stuff to go wrong.

Edited by mss1tw on 18/03/2014 at 09:51

Do you really need a 21st century car? - craig-pd130

I do like the W124s, and I admire what he's done. I would be very interested to know what all those replacements cost in parts and labour.

I'd be interested in doing a similar 'Trigger's broom' job on something like a W126 420 or 500, but fronting up the several thousands of pounds to get the work done would be a bit sobering. But then again, people are happy to pay thousands up front for a newish car ....

At the end of the day, the bloke has a car he really likes, in which most (if not all) of the service / wear items have been replaced, so it should (in theory) be as reliable as a new car.

Edited by craig-pd130 on 18/03/2014 at 10:36

Do you really need a 21st century car? - madf

I drove a new Mercedes 260E as a company car. (W124)

It was easy to drive.comfortable,treacherous at high speed on corners in the wet and unreliable.

I have no wish to own/drive or buy another.

Edited by madf on 18/03/2014 at 12:30

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

I drove a new Mercedes 260E as a company car. (W124)

It was easy to drive.comfortable,treacherous at high speed on corners in the wet and unreliable.

I have no wish to own/drive or buy another.

Not many people are daft enough to drive at high speed on corners in the wet.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet

S'funy but my W124 is the most sure footed car i've ever driven, no cornering problems at any speed wet or dry, my nerve gives before the car does.

Tyre choice with any RWD with no traction aids of any description is the imprtant thing, you do not want £40 a corner ditchfinders on one unless you want to feel the scenery.

The chap referred to in the OP has certainly gone to town, hope he does the necessary rustproofing to see the benefit.

Pity the Diesel in the 124 never got a OE turbo in RHD form, they did in LHD.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

gordonbennett, from all I've read he does appear to be carrying out the necessary rustproofing. BTW, are you a member of the Mercedes Owners Club?

Do you really need a 21st century car? - corax

I like his air conditioning list.

Basically he's replaced everything except the compressor and pipes :)

I bet the evaporator wasn't a nice job - usually needing the whole dash to come apart, although I may be wrong. It might be one of those cars where it just drops out of the bottom through a conveniently placed hatch, allowing one to escape an expensive booking with the osteopath for a couple of months.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet

BTW, are you a member of the Mercedes Owners Club?

I'm a member of one of the two UK forums, but seldom visit these days.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - jamie745

Even when I started driving in 2002, a 10 year old car was a K reg Escort s***box with no power steering and a gearbox which could circumnavigate the world.

Drive a 10 year old, looked after Focus today and you're fine.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - artill

Thats a little unfair on 1990s cars. You would struggle to find a worse car than that Escort. Drive a just launched K reg 306, or a 405 of the age and it would still put many modern cars to shame in how the drive, ride, and handle.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

Thats a little unfair on 1990s cars. You would struggle to find a worse car than that Escort. Drive a just launched K reg 306, or a 405 of the age and it would still put many modern cars to shame in how the drive, ride, and handle.

Indeed.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - SteveLee

Thats a little unfair on 1990s cars. You would struggle to find a worse car than that Escort. Drive a just launched K reg 306, or a 405 of the age and it would still put many modern cars to shame in how the drive, ride, and handle.

Or an Austin Maestro, the chassis was superb, good ride and handling – though not quite as good as the later legendary Peugeots, the Escort was so poor, it took Ford over 15 years to finally better the Maestro with their Focus – that must be the largest generational jump in history, the awful Mk5 Escort with chassis dynamics that would have shamed some 1950s cars to the leader of the pack in one jump. Much larger than the gap between the Sierra and the Mondeo as the last of the Sierras actually had good enough quality dampers and suspension tuning to the point where they rode and handled quite well - despite the archaic underpinnings – what took the shine off the Mondeo is the fact that the Nissan Primera already existed, which had an even better chassis than the Mondeo. (Stanza to Primera – another gulf jumped!)

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Andrew-T

Even when I started driving in 2002, a 10 year old car was a K reg Escort s***box with no power steering and a gearbox which could circumnavigate the world.

And in your earlier post (above) you slate 10-year-old cars in the 1980s, Jamie. Whose judgments were those?

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Collos25

Even when I started driving in 2002, a 10 year old car was a K reg Escort s***box with no power steering and a gearbox which could circumnavigate the world.

And in your earlier post (above) you slate 10-year-old cars in the 1980s, Jamie. Whose judgments were those?

Take no notice he fancies himself as a politician and we know they always speak the truth,

Do you really need a 21st century car? - jamie745

Are you telling me a 10 year old Montego was a desirable vehicle?

Do you really need a 21st century car? - madf

Are you telling me a 10 year old Montego was a desirable vehicle?

If your previous car was a 20 year old Escort, then yes. If on the other hand, you prefer a modicum of build quality and little rust and trim which does not fall apart - no.

But anyone who drives an S type Jaguar shows their lack of taste and ignorance of build quality :-)

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

But anyone who drives an S type Jaguar shows their lack of taste and ignorance of build quality :-)

Actually, Jamie747's S-Type is one of the revised models. I believe these were very well made and much more reliable than the earlier version. And better looking too, IMO.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - 1litregolfeater

Even as early as 1978, the British car industry was treated with some well deserved scepticism. I would say.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - SteveLee

Are you telling me a 10 year old Montego was a desirable vehicle?

The Montego drove a lot better than the Sierra launched two years before it. the Montego and its sister car revolutionised the way everyday cars were constructed, adopting aircraft technology utilising a bonded-in windscreen as a stressed component making body shells more ridged and lighter at the same time. A breakthrough of such magnitude it was adopted by everybody across the industry immediately. If you were lucky enough to get one that was screwed together properly, the Montego was an excellent car - as was the Maestro.

Many BL designs were superb - let down by underfunded development and shoddy workmanship from the bolshie strike-happy workforce. Take the Austin Maxi, a 5 door hatch, with a transversely mounted engine driving the front wheels through a 5 speed box - the blueprint for what most of us drive to this very day. Again, get a good one and it was superb - a thoroughly practical family car which was an astonishingly comfortable motorway mile muncher. Ditto the Princess was much better to drive than the competing death trap snap over-steering agricultural Ford Cortina MK4.

I agree, quality control and workmanship were always issues but the basic designs were excellent.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - galileo

Steve, quite agree with your comments on those BL cars - the company I worked for had Itals, Princesses then Maestros and Montegos as company cars. I did thousands of miles in them and they were, as you say, good designs if put together as they should be.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

I do like the W124s, and I admire what he's done. I would be very interested to know what all those replacements cost in parts and labour.

I'd be interested in doing a similar 'Trigger's broom' job on something like a W126 420 or 500, but fronting up the several thousands of pounds to get the work done would be a bit sobering. But then again, people are happy to pay thousands up front for a newish car ....

At the end of the day, the bloke has a car he really likes, in which most (if not all) of the service / wear items have been replaced, so it should (in theory) be as reliable as a new car.

Craig, I believe around £10,000. Some will think this is alot, however, many lose that in depreciation and cost to change with just one car.

All bodywork has just been carried out with the paint work done this week. It should be finished by the end of next week.

Edited by Trilogy on 27/03/2014 at 22:24

Do you really need a 21st century car? - jamie745

Very few people actually buy new cars. Instances of a person walking into a dealership and paying actual money for a car is quite rare. Most cars are bought by companies on finance deals, usually funded by the companies overdraft, probably with a state backed bank. Meaning every £6 an hour cleaner is paying for DIK Solutions Branch Assistant Deputy Supervisor Manager's Audi A4. Diesel. At that. Makes you sick doesn't it.

If it is sold to an 'ooman bean it's probably on finance which they can't afford, or on a PCP deal on which they don't intend to pay the final fee to actually keep or own the vehicle. Four years of bonkers interest on a car now worth half of it's original inflated value fails to deter these lemmings from signing up for another four years of debt as the bank gets richer out of your need to keep up with the Joneses.

Edited by Avant on 27/03/2014 at 23:27

Do you really need a 21st century car? - alan1302

Very few people actually buy new cars. Instances of a person walking into a dealership and paying actual money for a car is quite rare. Most cars are bought by companies on finance deals, usually funded by the companies overdraft, probably with a state backed bank. Meaning every £6 an hour cleaner is paying for DIK Solutions Branch Assistant Deputy Supervisor Manager's Audi A4. Diesel. At that. Makes you sick doesn't it.

If it is sold to an 'ooman bean it's probably on finance which they can't afford, or on a PCP deal on which they don't intend to pay the final fee to actually keep or own the vehicle. Four years of bonkers interest on a car now worth half of it's original inflated value fails to deter these lemmings from signing up for another four years of debt as the bank gets richer out of your need to keep up with the Joneses.

Jamie you are not correct about it being rare to buy a new car:

www.smmt.co.uk/2013/07/new-car-demand-up-10-in-fir.../

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Sofa Spud

QUOTE:...""Even as early as 1978, the British car industry was treated with some well deserved scepticism. I would say""

The irony is that a lot of those 1970's skeptics who shunned British cars chose instead to buy Renaults, Fiats, Citroens, Dafs and even the odd Wartburg or Moskvich!

Do you really need a 21st century car? - barney100

I went to the W124 day organized by the owner's club and I have to say some of the cars were immaculate. If you are of the 'keep it 'til it falls apart' persuasion then a W124 if looked after would probably outlive most owners.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - jamie745

Jamie you are not correct about it being rare to buy a new car:

Well you clearly didn't read what I said. I said it's rare for somebody to pay actual money for a car and a small piece of the article you link me to proves my point; in listing the reasons for increased sales it says;

Attractive finance packages have encouraged motorists to buy new cars.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet
Attractive finance packages have encouraged motorists to buy new cars.

Short memories, spending money they haven't got, because politicians, desperate to get re-elected onto the gravy train, tell them via their media spinners that the economy is on the up.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - artill

There seems to be a desire to take the moral high ground here about people who buy a car on finance. Who is to say what people should spend their money on?

I can think of many good reasons to have it. People who take up a manufacturer funded 0% offer so they can keep their money in the bank. People who need a fixed monthly expense instead of the unknown of a used car. People who dont understand cars, or want the to bother with getting a car fixed.

A cheap new car can cost as little as £100 a month, and yet has the security of a nice long warranty, new everything (so no replacements will be needed for years). Swap cars every 3 years, without ever paying for the car they drive, yet almost no risk of unexpected or unaffordable bills.

Of course its cheaper to run an older car, but we shouldnt assume anyone who chooses the option of a new car on finance is wrong.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Wackyracer

I'm very glad there are people who buy new cars, Regardless of if they pay cash or get finance etc. Without them there would be no secondhand cars for people like me who want to buy a good 3 year old car at 50% of it's original new price.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - madf

I'm very glad there are people who buy new cars, Regardless of if they pay cash or get finance etc. Without them there would be no secondhand cars for people like me who want to buy a good 3 year old car at 50% of it's original new price.

+1

C ars have been purchased on finance since the day they were made in volume...

Do you really need a 21st century car? - jamie745

There seems to be a desire to take the moral high ground here about people who buy a car on finance. Who is to say what people should spend their money on?

Well that's the point. It's not their money. Do keep up.

There are some fair reasons for signing up to one of these agreements, but anybody who thinks finance agreements are designed to help the customer is an idiot. They're designed to help the dealer, manufacturer and the bank. They wouldn't do it otherwise.

It just feeds into a general point that people spending money they haven't got is a major problem in this country.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - drd63
Anyway back to the original question - it's not about need, it's about want. I don't need a 21st century car but I do want one and I also want the safety, reliability, toys, performance, economy etc so change every 90 to 100k miles or about 3 years oh and the variety is great too so I can't remember the last time I replaced even remotely like for like or even the same manufacturer.
Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

I'd question 21st century cars are more reliable. There's more to go wrong therefore likely to be less reliable. I can see people want the advances in safety features.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - alan1302

There is more to go wrong but do they go wrong more? In the last 6-7 years I have had 4 cars and only one had a serious problem outside normal wear and tear. And that was a Fiat that have never been known to be reliable!

Would be interesting to see some stats if there are any about.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - drd63

Purely anecdotal but in the past 10 years of 7 cars and the best part of 400k miles between my partner and I we've had the following problems outside of normal servicing - faulty fuel pump - Freelander, fixed under warranty, flat battery, Hyundai, lights left on and once started all fine again. Given all the stuff in modern cars fantastic and much, much better than the stuff of 10 let alone 20 years ago. It's stuff like tracking which stays true, brakes which don't start pulling, wipers that don't lift at speed, door seals that don't whistle, each new generation just gets more refined and better developed.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - HandCart

Hoy ! The 1970's Renault 12 was very well engineered and reliable!

Do you really need a 21st century car? - madf

Hoy ! The 1970's Renault 12 was very well engineered and reliable!

And a deathbox compared to modern cars.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - HandCart

But not a deathbox compared with other 1970s cars, British or otherwise, that Sofa Spud was talking about.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - John F

No. [assuming 20thC ended on 31.12.2000]. S plate A6, X plate Focus and V suffix TR7 all running well, thanks - engines kept well oiled and watered, no rust allowed to progress beyond its appearance. Depreciation costs [all bought second hand] long since forgotten. All pass MoT with ease, no warnings this yr.

Seems to me that modern electronics and fancy mechanicals trade longevity for efficiency, which is fine for new-car-high-milers but not for 8K a year folk like me. [mileage, not income]

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Avant

John's and others' experiences suggest that the 1990s were a sort of 'high point' where cars were of course more reliable than those of a generation before, but didn't yet have all the added-on three letter acronyms that we have to have now, mostly for the sake of lowering emissions.

I think this is especially true of diesel engines, and it seems that their popularity may soon be on the decline if it isn't already. There are several factors:

- the scares about particulate pollution, the latest in yesterday's Sunday Times

- the expensive repairs needed to the 'acronyms' when engines reach a high mileage

- the greater efficiency of modern petrol engines (my high-performance Octavia vRS will do 40 mpg on a long run)

- the greater torque of modern petrol engines - some of them anyway, including mine - which reduces what used to be a very real advantage of driving a diesel

- coupled with the continuing higher price of diesel fuel and the ever-present diesel noise.

Residual values for diesels are still higher, but there are some of us, including HJ, who think that this differential will soon even out.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Wackyracer

I also think the trend is changing back towards petrol again. For me the lure of going to a diesel was the low price of diesel coupled with increased MPG and the low torque drivability.

Now all these things can be had with a petrol engined car and the fact that diesel prices have gone up about 100% in the last 15 or so years making it more expensive than petrol.

Actually, There is one thing that I do like in my car and yet it is totally unnecessary and it would not be a deal breaker if I wanted a car and it did not have it. Oil level guage, A simple idea which means in 1 second I can check the oil level before every journey. Of course I do still use the dipstick once a week, Just incase the guage becomes faulty.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - John F

Actually, There is one thing that I do like in my car and yet it is totally unnecessary and it would not be a deal breaker if I wanted a car and it did not have it. Oil level guage, A simple idea which means in 1 second I can check the oil level before every journey. Of course I do still use the dipstick once a week, Just incase the guage becomes faulty.

Surely no need to check so frequently if you 'know' your engine? You'll wear out the bonnet catch! My old 6cyl 2.8 130,000m A6 does well over 2000m per litre so I only check it when it clocks up another 1000m. Our little 1.6 Focus engine requires a mere 500mls every 3000m or so - just turned 99,000m so that only gets checked every blue moon.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - SteveLee

Early 2000s, most manufacturers still hadn't been slayed the rust monster by the late 90s.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet

Well money put where mouth is.

The 04 Outlander never really endeared itself to us, not fast enough for SWMBO, and its going to be sold on to a friend whio likes them.

So, there i was perusing the bay of E one evening when an intersting looking Subaru Outback 3.0 H6 cropped up on auction, 52 plate but crucially a 90's design, just over 100k with almost full history, loads of tax full MOT and looked OK, so i bought the blighter (for a ridiculously cheap price and i'm not saying how much).

Went up on the train and bought it, its a gem, as was the seller, a straight bloke, sweet engine new exhaust new tyres, well serviced, few scratches on the bumpers but nothing to worry about.

Did me usual full examination, during which i found both front drive shaft inner boots leaking, regular job from 80k on they sit immediately above the twin cats so heat does for them.

So did them, proper job, none of those stretchy elastic boots, and slipped a new set of discs and pads on whilst there, £134 for all discs and pads, Mintex.

Everything came undone, typical Japanese in that the car was designed to be fully maintained simply not just easy oil changes, i actually enjoyed doing the work and thats not been the case with newer European cars.

Its showing no rust apart from expected exposed subframe surface rust, so full rustproofing this year, will replace all transmission oils (auto box recently done, but i'll do it again to make sure the TC is drained), will probably LPG it.

Hope to keep it a long long time, it goes like hell, lovely auto box, compliant ride on sensible 60 aspect 16" tyres, only £8 more to insure than the 2.4 Outlander.

Funky under the bonnet, none of this missing dipstick rubbish of modern stuff, its got 3 dipsticks, engine, auto transmission and front diff.

Thats it, sorted, and SWMBO loves it.

Edited by gordonbennet on 08/04/2014 at 20:01

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Alby Back
I like the sound of that GB. Proper find I'd say.

Will you gas it? Or is it not going to be doing enough mileage to warrant the expense?
Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet
I like the sound of that GB. Proper find I'd say. Will you gas it? Or is it not going to be doing enough mileage to warrant the expense?

Hello Alby, nice to hear from you.

Yes will probably gas it, have a man lined up already, 'payback', which isn't the be all and end all with us, will take about 2 years max, but the sheer pleaure of depriving dick turpin of his extortionate gains every time we fill up is a big part of the reason too.

If you remember correctly i always said estate cars were the thing to have, but you wouldn't hear of it...i'm sure thats how it went...-:)))))))

How's your fleet doing?

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Alby Back
Nothing much to report. All mirrors intact. 85k already on the 2.5 year old Merc still on original brakes amazingly enough, and no probs so far. 45k on the 6 year old Qq with again no impending doom apparent other than a bit of surface rust on the sump tray. Might do something about that sometime. I think it's a keeper now. She likes it anyway. I'm still not a fan of driving while sitting at bar stool height but she likes sitting up in the air.

Yes indeedy, an estate car eh? Who'd have thought it?

You'll be buying some bike racks for it soon I expect...

;-)
Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet

Not so sure about the bike racks, though i probably know a bloke who's always trying to flog one, but grandaughter may well change my anti exercise regime, so never say never.

Well done on those brakes, proper driving that, looks like MB really have turned the corner from their late 90's debacle.

Another German thing, my MAN lorry is now about 15 months, just done 170k kms,so just over 100k miles, still showing over 50% left on all pads on the dash readout (there's posh for you), nothing yet gone wrong with that either, original drive axle tyres just been recut so should time nicely for a new set to go into next winter with, now all i have to do is persuade my gaffer to stump up for an evaluation set of winter drive axle tyres for it..;)

Edited by gordonbennet on 08/04/2014 at 20:57

Do you really need a 21st century car? - corax

Thats it, sorted, and SWMBO loves it.

Glad you've gone and bought a Subaru GB, if it's anything like mine it will be totally reliable and enjoyable to drive. What colour is it?

I think those earlier models can take a din sized aftermarket stereo if wanted - on the later Legacys the stereo is part of the climate control panel and hard to uprate. So no DAB or aux input.

That 3.0 H6 must be inaudible most of the time.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet

Hello Corax.

Don't need to do anything with the audio i think the car is a Lux pack or something, twin sunroofed etc and the audio is really good, radio, cassette and CD all in one, haven't seen one of those for yonks, looks far too big to be a standard din.

It was your dabble into Subarus that got me thinking, and i just happened to spot this one when faffing about, as you do.

Engine sounds lovely, and yes at low revs its almost silent.

Its silver over grey, still haven't got me a dark green car, at this rate i'll be dead before i do get one, maybe SWMBO will arrange a green funeral car, can't say hea rse here the swear filter will have a fit..;)

Wouldn't mind picking your brain if you don't mind, where to go for good parts when needed.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Alby Back
>>where to go for good parts when needed...

Should've bought a Mondeo estate instead y'know. Very seldom need parts them...

Ah well, you knew it wouldn't last !

;-)

Do you really need a 21st century car? - corax
>>where to go for good parts when needed... Should've bought a Mondeo estate instead y'know. Very seldom need parts them... Ah well, you knew it wouldn't last ! ;-)

Groan :)

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet
>>where to go for good parts when needed... Should've bought a Mondeo estate instead y'know. Very seldom need parts them... Ah well, you knew it wouldn't last ! ;-)

Don't you start you you cruel disposer of faithful to a fault cars you, poor old Betsy still weeping like a little unwanted orphan, thats if she hasn't been crushed

I know you like Fords, well you say you do though from what i understand you didn't hand the MB back in disgust and demand a Diesel Mundano to smoke the motorway out with...and you threw your last one out with the trash without a moments thought.

To be fair modern Ford Diesels seem to be fine till they start to go wrong, then boy oh boy start tacking noughts onto the bill as nobody seems able to sort 'em out, i wouldn't mind but they're horrible to drive anyway, we now have a new Focus Diesel pool car as well as a petrol Fiesta, what is all the hype about, you couldn't pay me enough to own either...so glad to get back in me old Benz whenever i've had the misfortune to drive either.

.;)

Edited by gordonbennet on 08/04/2014 at 21:39

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

Well money put where mouth is.

The 04 Outlander never really endeared itself to us, not fast enough for SWMBO, and its going to be sold on to a friend whio likes them.

So, there i was perusing the bay of E one evening when an intersting looking Subaru Outback 3.0 H6 cropped up on auction, 52 plate but crucially a 90's design, just over 100k with almost full history, loads of tax full MOT and looked OK, so i bought the blighter (for a ridiculously cheap price and i'm not saying how much).

Went up on the train and bought it, its a gem, as was the seller, a straight bloke, sweet engine new exhaust new tyres, well serviced, few scratches on the bumpers but nothing to worry about.

Did me usual full examination, during which i found both front drive shaft inner boots leaking, regular job from 80k on they sit immediately above the twin cats so heat does for them.

So did them, proper job, none of those stretchy elastic boots, and slipped a new set of discs and pads on whilst there, £134 for all discs and pads, Mintex.

Everything came undone, typical Japanese in that the car was designed to be fully maintained simply not just easy oil changes, i actually enjoyed doing the work and thats not been the case with newer European cars.

Its showing no rust apart from expected exposed subframe surface rust, so full rustproofing this year, will replace all transmission oils (auto box recently done, but i'll do it again to make sure the TC is drained), will probably LPG it.

Hope to keep it a long long time, it goes like hell, lovely auto box, compliant ride on sensible 60 aspect 16" tyres, only £8 more to insure than the 2.4 Outlander.

Funky under the bonnet, none of this missing dipstick rubbish of modern stuff, its got 3 dipsticks, engine, auto transmission and front diff.

Thats it, sorted, and SWMBO loves it.

Hi gordonbennet,

Must be silver.:)

I had a 1990 2.2 GX over 10 years ago, a great car. I'd have another Legacy without hesitation if my mileage was lower.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - gordonbennet

Yes Trilogy, good guess its silver, though most phase 2 H6's for sale recently have been green or red over grey.

Its quite shocking the bargains you can get with gas guzzlers now.

Do you really need a 21st century car? - Trilogy

Yes Trilogy, good guess its silver, though most phase 2 H6's for sale recently have been green or red over grey.

Its quite shocking the bargains you can get with gas guzzlers now.

Actually, I didn't guess. :)

Do you really need a 21st century car? - RickyBoy
Hi Jamie (good to read your posts again - seriously - I genuinely like 'em) ...

I've ordered a new car for delivery later this year. (see 'well subscribed to' thread to that effect elsewhere/early March). First one in 11-years as a matter of fact.

Getting jack$*** interest these days of course, haven't been for years, so I thought I'd spend a little on myself before I 'shuffle-off'. The kids can fight amongst themselves over the bricks & mortar! ...

... managed to beat a main dealer down on a new-build by just shy of 10% by threatening to buy off the interweb the following day (I would've 'n' all). Was going to 'lump-on' the full amount then after a teeny bit of research I discovered just how cheap it is to borrow money at the moment.

So, after Dave has given me another £200 WF payment in November and the Bank of Mr Sainsbury has credited me with £25 simply for personally dealing with him, my first year's interest will cost me much less than a decent pub-lunch!

What's not to like? ...

Best,
RB
Do you really need a 21st century car? - RickyBoy
... and that's a Northern working-man's pub-lunch of course, not a Canary Wharf £14.99 'under-filled Panini'! ...