any - 20 mph dangerous................ - oldroverboy.

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/17/20mph-limit-da.../

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Smileyman

has anyone ever sued a local road authority body for failing to provide a safe space in which to walk/cycle/travel? etc Certainly whoever wasted so much public money on these schemes that have resulted in an increased accident count should be considering their positions, there has been a lack of proper research; probably the schemes should have been rolled out more slowly if only to evaluate their impact before introducing more.

Also will have caused an increased demand on healthcare services (NHS) and as a person who has recently lost a close relative in tragic circumstances (not road related) if I were the families of anyone injured or worse reading the Telegragh report would be very upsetting indeed.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

I had noticed in several areas roads that had speed limits reduced from 30MPH to 20mph, pedestrians appear to take longer crossing the road including our high st, where most people just walk straight into the road without looking

Some crossings are the same in that they have been put directly on the entrance to roundabouts or within a few metres which is stark raving mad imo, plenty of near misses that should not happen!

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bromptonaut

Some crossings are the same in that they have been put directly on the entrance to roundabouts or within a few metres which is stark raving mad imo, plenty of near misses that should not happen!

They're there becuase it's not just roads that cross at roundabouts. So do the adjacent footpaths. If you're having near misses because of them you need to up your hazard perception skills.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - galileo

Some crossings are the same in that they have been put directly on the entrance to roundabouts or within a few metres which is stark raving mad imo, plenty of near misses that should not happen!

They're there becuase it's not just roads that cross at roundabouts. So do the adjacent footpaths. If you're having near misses because of them you need to up your hazard perception skills.

There are sets of traffic lights on a busy A road roundabout in our town, with their usual brilliance the council have installed a Pelican crossing right on an exit, which doesn't seem synchronised with the lights on the rouindabout: roundabout lights go green, but because a pedestrian pressed the button, the exit light shows red and unnecessary congestion follows. (There is another pedestrian crossing 50 yards along the road)

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - daveyjp

As someone who now lives in the middle of a 20 zone area I suspect the increase is due to drivers who simply can't or refuse to drive at the posted limit.

Even when it was 30 our residential street often had drivers doing more than that, now it's 20 I have experienced drivers overtaking me on a stretch of the road which has speed bumps and goes past a school and library and has numerous side roads.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Smileyman

I guess it might have something to do with the fact that driving is a means of getting from place a to place b, and as the travel time is usually dead time it's always worthwhile in reducing journey time as much as possible .... cue the dislike for 20mph zones - except on residential side streets with lots of parked cars and where children play ... the rightful home of a 20mph zone

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - 520i

20mph zones should be used only in very limited circumstances, where there is a clear justification due to a specific reason, thereby remaining exceptional and having a far greater effect. Once you put them everywhere, they do nothing but irritate people. Combined with a complete lack of enforcement, everybody simply ignores them. Those areas where there really is a need for such a tight limit - outside schools for example - are then simply lost into the background. All of these schemes appear to have been massively expensive, and so are unlikely to be reversed. Essentially, the authorities have made our roads more dangerous and are now disinterested in rectifying the mistake. Nice.

Edited by 520i on 18/12/2017 at 23:58

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

Combined with a complete lack of enforcement, everybody simply ignores them.

That sums it all up, really. Any posted speed limit is an arbitrary round number, giving drivers a target where they would otherwise go at whatever speed they thought suitable, using their well-honed skill and judgment.

Enforcement should not be necessary, but we all know that there must be some, if only to deal with loonies who resent being regulated. If all drivers co-operated and behaved themselves we might need many fewer posted speed limits, which are now so numerous that it makes me wonder if traps are being set deliberately.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Manatee

Essentially, the authorities have made our roads more dangerous and are now disinterested .

Uniinterested.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

If you're having near misses because of them you need to up your hazard perception skills.

I did not mention I was having near misses as its not me that does.. I have observed what happens while walking past the junction, as for my perception skills, they are perfectly ok, thank you!

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - gordonbennet

One size fits all, and what should be a good idea is overkilled so the times that where such things are really needed they get overlooked.

We see the same with the sea of hiviz vests and jackets, so common now they are just another item of clothing and blend into the background, box ticked.

As noted by Galileo, we have brilliantly sited pelican crossings in Kettering, almost all the town traffic is forced into a single corridor which runs beside the railway line, it has a 4 way double mini roundabout at one end, a three way mini roundabout half way along, and a larger 4 way roundabout at the other end (hospital 300 yds off this one with hopeless parking facilities), all within 1/4 mile length of road...and yes there are pelican crossings immediately on most roads off, which all causes ridiculous problems hence much of the northbound town traffic now passes through the other side of the centre through narrow terraced streets with not a pedestrian crossing to be found, often the case where the less affluent live.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - concrete

Where we used to live lots of money was spent introducing these 20mph zones. Mainly on signs and road markings. The result...... completely ignored by most drivers who seemed unaware the limit was now 20 and not 30. Not that 30 was ever observed by some. All they did was move the problem into an adjacent area. Other roads became 'rat runs' to avoid the slower zones. Of course when this was pointed out the LA refused to acknowledge the fact. It seems we are doomed to be victims of local authority staff not thinking clearly and thoroughly about any problem and the consequences of any imposed solution. If it goes wrong, and it usually does, they won't acknowledge it because it makes them look the fools they are. Any idea or suggestion from the public is totally dismissed, simply because they didn't think of it first and agian makes them look foolish. Instead of embracing serious input it is ignored. What a world. I would love to be the Minister for Banging Heads Together.

Cheers Concrete

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

If it goes wrong, and it usually does, they won't acknowledge it because it makes them look the fools they are. Any idea or suggestion from the public is totally dismissed, simply because they didn't think of it first and agian makes them look foolish. Instead of embracing serious input it is ignored.

Concrete - unfortunately, it's the easiest thing to criticise others for c*cking things up. Their problem is that there are groups of residents with conflicting suggestions for dealing with the traffic in their neighbourhood. The poor s*ds in the council try to placate whichever group makes the most noise, while trying to waste money in the cheapest way. I guess most of us don't fancy being in that position, so we don't stand in the local elections.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - concrete

I agree with you Andrew. It is easy to criticise, but foolish decisions made on the criterior of 'whoever shouts the loudest' make it easier still. You are correct in stating that very few of us would wish to be elected to a position which often places us in invidious positions. Having served on several committees I know how difficult it is to form a collective decision that solves the problem at hand. This by no means excuses any local authority from making poor decisions and lack of accountability afterwards. Councillors have suggestions, but council officers make decisions and expedite them and they are virtually untouchable with regard to repercussions. In my commercial life many of the local authority officers mistakes would have the the consequence of being severly reprimanded or even sacked. With regard to the point of the thread. There weren't any consultations with the local populace before the 20mph zone was imposed. There may have been a low level box ticking exercise beforehand but nothing that I was aware of and I take an active interest in my local area. I don't expect perfection, I just wish that local government was better run. Simples.

Cheers Concrete

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - HGV ~ P Valentine

All drivers behave themselves and act responsibility, in some place in outer space but certainly never going to happen here on planet earth, i truely believe there are several reason why driving has become so bad.

1 .. Police presence, The invisibility of the police on our roads is I think a major factor, while cameras can sometimes catch people they do not act as a detterant to speeding, and when you to take footage of some one speeeding to the police its like, so what is the attitude you get.

2 .. The 20mph speed limit is a joke because even though its on our roads the cameras are still set to 30, and most have figured that out, as one guy said try going 20 and you will ahve either someone riding your bumper or overtake.

3 .. The 20 mph is set by the councils but based on RTC info from the highways agency to which they have acccess, so it may not particularly be near a school but an accident black spot, but the main reason is yet again driver attitude.

4 .. My borther who has never been and is not particularly good at driving, stated that he thinks ( it amazing to think he has a brain in there, somewhere, based on the grounds he talks and you need a brain to talk .. right ? ) these speed limits are in place for the sole reason of putting points on your license, he is not the only 1

5 .. car drivers and some truck & bus drivers refuse to stay on this limit because they cannot see any hazards ahead and therefore think its a stupid speed to travel at.

Anyway as for research thats simply not true the highways agency has the sole job of montoring our driving habits all year around and not just fixing the roads, they don't do either particularly well but we are stuck with them.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - HGV ~ P Valentine

P.s

I asked someone from the highways agency why crossing are put so close to roundabouts, this is a particular problem for hgv's as we are slow to accelerate esp in an automatic.

the answer was simply because they think its safer as we should already be breaking on the approach and thus its easier for us to slow down a little bit more, they also said because the lighting is usually better.

Why on the exit, because they reckon our sense of looking out for other users is already heightened.

When I pointed out that this only causes truckers to either block the crossing, or force people to stop on the roundabout because it takes so long to get onto it, he had no answer.

When i said it also causes children etc to cross the road between 2 cars, blocking their view of cars etc once they are moer then halfway through, he had no answer.

It is stupid place to put a pedestrian crossing, unless its controlled by lights.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - FoxyJukebox

Large,in fact very large/flashing warning signage is essential here.

Most motorists drive UP TO 20mph if they are in a 20 zone--which is actually quite fast outside a school , hospital or busy pedestrian junction/area.

The other day I was in N.London exceeding this limit. There was no visible guidance or warning to reduce speed.

I hope I was not flashed.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

It is not allways speed that is the problem around schools, it is mostly the driver that is unable to manouevre properly, those that have large cars with possibly bad visibility and unable to see who is around them.

that is where the problem comes, several schools I pass during term time on roads only capable of three lanes, parking on each side of the road, between driveways, and centre lane that drivers try to get 2 cars through with no one giving way for anyone

parents and children who try to cross find it very hard to cross between these cars trying to park, but by hook or by crook they will park no matter who they hold up

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - argybargy

They can't or won't enforce 30 around here, let alone 20.

Before we moved to North Wales I had heard that the local traffic police were very hot on speeding, especially when committed by those accursed invaders from over the border. Judging by the complete absence of enforcement in this county apart from a handful of fixed cameras and a couple of high profile camera vans which you always find in the same places, police and council have abandoned motorists and pedestrians alike to their fate and washed their hands of any responsibility for road deaths and injuries.

Apart, that is, from some road humps installed on a nearby high street at great cost, and which are likely to be removed soon. Residents are up in arms because the humps damage their cars, impede progress and make loud noises when vehicles go over them.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

impede progress and make loud noises when vehicles go over them.

people buy large motors so they can speed over the humps, they forget they are there to protect pedestrians/slow drivers down

never giving it a thought that their speed is what is causing them to hit the humps, even small cars are doing the same thing-driving over the humps at great speed and clobering the front and rear of the motor?

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - gordonbennet

It never ceases to surprise just how uncaring and/or mechanically ignorant people are, nor how common sense has almost disappeared.

Our nearest supermarket is an Asda, it has about half a dozen speed humps on the approach road, those half moon rubber ones which are very hard on the vehicle, my suspension damping is adjustable inside and i have it set to soft during the winter anyway and it rides over these quite gently, but i still take it easy.

What i noticed last time i went in there, temperatures way below freezing, is that i was as usual holding other people up on the approach and exit and drivers coming the other way were driving as if the road was silky smooth their cars hitting each one with a severe jolt, this road alone must account for hundreds of broken springs and leaking or broken dampers plus other wear and tear over the course of a winter especially, do modern cars not come with variable throttles any more, i'm beginning to wonder.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

those half moon rubber ones which are very hard on the vehicle,

The only sensible kind of speed-hump is the cushion, which can be straddled at reasonable speed without doing much harm. I've always wondered what emergency vehicles are expected to do with full-width humps - ambulances and loaded fire appliances must love them.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - argybargy

In a previous life I was a member of a resident's group campaigning for traffic calming measures in our local area.

After seemingly endless public meetings we got what we wanted, and for the first few weeks after the humps were laid our roads were much quieter. However, some folks, probably not residents, continued to drive as if the obstacles were not there. Great gouges appeared on the surfaces of the humps where sumps and exhaust pipes had been dragged and snagged due to drivers feeling more resentment at having to slow down than sympathy for their vehicles.

Evetntually it dawned on the majority of drivers that they could still use these roads if they slowed down a bit before the humps and drove like maniacs between them. Result: REV/ THUMP...REV/ THUMP...REV/ THUMP...etc etc.

Fifty grand of public money, and several weeks of disruption to our neighbourhood's roads and pavements for nothing.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - barney100

Same here, thousands spent on humps..several years later the humps are taken out and the road beautifully resurfaced....few weeks later the humps are reinstalled for thousands. Local council says it's nothing to do with them it's Hampshire CC. They fob you off when you complain. Accident figures pre and post? don't know 'police have figures' Rev/Thump/rev /thump is just perfect to descibe the effect.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - HGV ~ P Valentine

When the fire service or an ambulance has to slow down because of your stupid speed humps, and it cost the life of one of your family, will you still think its a good idea ??

Speed cameras are a much better idea, get caught 4 times and they are off the road.

And just so you know all the emergency services have approached gov to get them taken out, it b*****s up their equipment which they need to save lives. and as I mentioned where minutes cost lives slows them down too much, esp the fire service because they have a live load in the back, in the form of tons of water.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - galileo

those half moon rubber ones which are very hard on the vehicle,

The only sensible kind of speed-hump is the cushion, which can be straddled at reasonable speed without doing much harm. I've always wondered what emergency vehicles are expected to do with full-width humps - ambulances and loaded fire appliances must love them.

Buses, ambulances and fire trucks can straddle these without trouble, but if cars straddle them (as HJ repeatedly points out) the inner sides of the tyres are damaged by running over the edges. For cars, it is recommended to run one wheel over the flat top and the other in the gap between hump and kerb or other hump.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - barney100

Did my speed awareness course today and asked the presenters about 20mph effectiveness. They said data supported the effectiveness of them despite what the press are putting out. Very interesting.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

Did my speed awareness course today and asked the presenters about 20mph effectiveness. They said data supported the effectiveness of them despite what the press are putting out. Very interesting.

You dont need data to confirm what goes on, most drivers see it for themselves, every day!.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - carl233

They are flawed solutions in my opinion, this is all part of an agenda to slow the motorist to a crawl. Research agenda 21 which has been renamed to agenda 30. making car use as difficult and challenging as possible as a small part of this.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

They are flawed solutions in my opinion, this is all part of an agenda to slow the motorist to a crawl. Research agenda 21 which has been renamed to agenda 30. making car use as difficult and challenging as possible as a small part of this.

Great conspiracy theory. Being more rational, I suggest it is a well-intentioned attempt to reduce danger and congestion, but without anticipating many of the unexpected consequences ?

Edited by Andrew-T on 21/12/2017 at 09:30

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - alan1302

They are flawed solutions in my opinion, this is all part of an agenda to slow the motorist to a crawl. Research agenda 21 which has been renamed to agenda 30. making car use as difficult and challenging as possible as a small part of this.

I don't think I will bother researching that...can tell you speaking nonsense without research!

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - carl233

Well if you are able to come to such a such a conclusion about something without conducting any form of research that really does sum up the level that we are operating at. Anything that does not match your level of conditioning cannot be true and must be 'nonsense'.

Try looking up the term: cognitive dissonance

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

Try looking up the term: cognitive dissonance

That is a good example of a term which conveys nothing to anyone except those who have been on courses in social sciences or suchlike. It is pretty daft to suggest any agenda whose purpose is to 'slow motorists to a crawl'; almost everyone is a motorist some of the time, but at other times a pedestrian or a cyclist, so different needs must be balanced somehow. No doubt it looks like a conspiracy to some.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - carl233

Cognitive dissonance is a very valid term that really highlights the state that society has allowed itself to enter, society in general is misinformed typically due to the view of 'everything' only being what is covered by the media. It is growing quite clear to most people with a brain cell on active duty that is a coordinated and managed effort to slow down the motorist. Using climate change as a reason will also play a role in this.

Agenda 21 and later versions of the same thing cannot happen quickly and as such slowing people down as much as possible is the first small step within that respective element of what is planned in relation to car ownership and more importantly usage. Agenda 21 is a large subject and the transportation portion is simply one part of it.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Boroman
“Twenty’s Plenty” signs abound - away from the main roads in my home town in central Scotland. Housing estates, mostly built in the 1960’s. No other traffic calming measures and it all seems to work well, the streets are narrow and no-one with any sense would try to do 30mph.
any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

It is growing quite clear to most people with a brain cell on active duty that is a coordinated and managed effort to slow down the motorist.

This seems to imply that motorists should not be slowed down. Why is that a basic premise? The other implication is that anyone who thinks differently has few cells on active duty. As one still with quite a few active cells I resent that.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - alan1302

Well if you are able to come to such a such a conclusion about something without conducting any form of research that really does sum up the level that we are operating at. Anything that does not match your level of conditioning cannot be true and must be 'nonsense'.

Try looking up the term: cognitive dissonance

No it's fine - I know what it means.

You just like a good conspracy no matter how daft it maybe.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - carl233

Not connected to the subject but do you know the true meaning of 'conspiracy'. It was a term created by the CIA back in the mid 1960's:

'a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.'

'the action of plotting or conspiring.'

Lets see where we are within the next 15 years or so with car ownership and the general freedom to use etc. Perhaps then the message may hit home about where this is all planning to lead.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - alan1302

Not connected to the subject but do you know the true meaning of 'conspiracy'. It was a term created by the CIA back in the mid 1960's:

'a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.'

'the action of plotting or conspiring.'

Lets see where we are within the next 15 years or so with car ownership and the general freedom to use etc. Perhaps then the message may hit home about where this is all planning to lead.

The word is from the mid 14th centrury - certainly not the 1960's all invented by the CIA.

I look forward to hearing back from you in 15 years.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - carl233

It was a neutral word until then, the word that we associate today with the current pejorative connotation as interpreted by 'the mainstream' was started by the CIA in the 1960’s. This is confirmed by multiple sources.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - barney100

Whatever your opinion on speed limits if you are above the posted limit and cause an accident you have little if no defence.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Manatee

It was a neutral word until then, the word that we associate today with the current pejorative connotation as interpreted by 'the mainstream' was started by the CIA in the 1960’s. This is confirmed by multiple sources.

You are confusing the word conspiracy with the term 'conspiracy theory'

From the Wikipedia article you have clearly used as a source, "According to John Ayto, the phrase conspiracy theory was originally a neutral term and acquired a pejorative connotation only in the 1960s, with an implication that the theorist is paranoid."

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - HGV ~ P Valentine

They straddle them by slowing down, even on the way to an emergemcy, is that a good idea in your opinion to slow down the emergency services, would you want them to slow down if they are needed at your house with your family trapped in an upstairs room. they cant speed because it would damage their equipment.

All the emregency services want them taken out, what does that tell you ?

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - alan1302

They straddle them by slowing down, even on the way to an emergemcy, is that a good idea in your opinion to slow down the emergency services, would you want them to slow down if they are needed at your house with your family trapped in an upstairs room. they cant speed because it would damage their equipment.

All the emregency services want them taken out, what does that tell you ?

Assuming you take out all the speed humps - how will you get drivers to slow down in the areas where they are?

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

They straddle them by slowing down, even on the way to an emergemcy, is that a good idea in your opinion to slow down the emergency services, would you want them to slow down if they are needed at your house with your family trapped in an upstairs room. they cant speed because it would damage their equipment.

All the emregency services want them taken out, what does that tell you ?

Assuming you take out all the speed humps - how will you get drivers to slow down in the areas where they are?

You won`t if they are determined to get through quickly, and some buy motors specially to get over these humps quick. better to put speed cameras in that are not easily seen, ie hide them in street lamps or similar

hard luck if drivers moan, they are there for a reason!

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - tourantass
In portugal they have speed activated traffic lights, that appeared to work well. While we were on a visit to oz my son explained that the location of speed cameras are not known and in western Australia you get double points on your licence if caught speeding (applies to other offences as well) on a public/bank holiday ...which tends to focus the drivers at those busy times.......I will always remember when we went touring up the east coast of Oz, when we got onto Bruce highway, I put into our satnav our first destination and was instructed.......after 365 miles.....turn right.... Oh the memories.
any - 20 mph dangerous................ - galileo

From my observation, the 'cushion' style humps have a width which is less than the distance between firetruck wheels, son in law (who is a fireman) says they don't need to slow at all for these. Ambulances also ar e minimally affected by 'cushion ' humps. Plateau humps, full road width are different, but I have heard that traffic cops in don't necessarily slow much for them.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - ExA35Owner

Road engineers will be well aware that motorists exceed the speed limit. The intention is to reduce the average speed of traffic, even if some motorists commit speeding offences.

Unfortunately speed cameras seem to have a very poor reputation - they are seen as a means of gaining revenue rather than reducing speed. This makes it politically next to impossible to install enough speed cameras to bring about total enforcement. So one alternative is speed bumps of whatever type - and yes, they have drawbacks too. Active policing to cover the same area would be very expensive - and again might be politically difficult: "Why aren't you catching burglars?"

The kinetic energy of a car is proportional to the square of its velocity. So a car at 20 mph has only about 45% of the KE of a car at 30 mph, and will cause proportionally less damage to whatever it hits - pedestrian, cyclist, wall, parked car. There is therefore good reason for slowing traffic where there's a heightened risk of collision. The problem lies in finding a method of doing so that is politically acceptable and economically possible. I would guess that many quite clever people have been working on this - but failed as yet to find a better solution.

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Bolt

Road engineers will be well aware that motorists exceed the speed limit.

They also need to be aware that pedestrians are very often distracted from whats going on in the road, so walking straight in front of/into the side of a motor is a more regular occurance now than it ever was

so its not all the drivers fault accidents happen, though if children and teenagers are being taught the dangers of using mobile phones while walking, there not doing a very good job..but then adults are no better either!

any - 20 mph dangerous................ - Andrew-T

I don't know how much of a road engineer's remit includes the behaviour of other road users - and of the drivers themselves. The purpose may be to limit the speed of vehicles to 20mph, but the shape of the humps may be such that they can only genuinely be nogotiated (without cumulative damage) to about 12mph.

So besides this cumulative damage, there is annoyance to local residents caused by cyclic accelerations, plus the nuisance factor of parked vehicles sometimes making it impossible to straddle cushions in the manner intended. All in all, they are a very mixed blessing, and only a very partial cure.