Review: Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009)
Far better than the previous model. The Grand model seats seven. Practical and versatile. Excellent crash test rating.
Potentially heavy tyre wear on Scenics with 17-inch wheels. Blown turbos on diesel models. Patchy build quality. Dashboard failures common. Heater fan motor failures common.
Recently Added To This Review
Report of failure of three injectors over the years in 2015 Renault Scenic 1.5DCI, now at 35,000 miles. Owner also complained of having to replace rusted rear brake discs. Read more
Report of 2006 Renault Scenic now at 64,500 miles starting to get expensive to run over the last year: Handbrake reading codes faulty £36.00; Brake light switch and labour £87.19; Parking brake... Read more
Report of failure of timing belt on 2009/59 Renault Scenic 1.5DCI at 85,000 miles. Belt had been replaced in June 2015 at 51,000 miles but no mention of waterpump also being replaced. Read more
Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009): At A Glance
Shock announcement: I'm about to recommend a Renault. I have just spent a week with a Scenic dCi 120 Privilege and, far from finding faults, I enjoyed every minute of it.
One reason was the cheerful, perky, free-revving 120bhp diesel engine (this one had done 8,000 miles). Another was the near perfect 6-speed gearbox.
What does a Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009) cost?
Buy a used Renault Scenic from £5,498
Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009): What's It Like Inside?
- Boot space is 200–1920 litres
I liked the seating position, the steering, the handling and the thoughtful design of the interior. You can lose things in there. Apart from the glovebox, there are eight separate lidded storage compartments, and a between-the-seats console box so big it could take a small dog. It might be an idea for Renault to run a valeters competition for the most unusual object found in those cubby holes during a pre-sale clean-up.
The car has a flat floor so you can slide across with reasonable ease. To accomplish this Renault has adopted a dash mounted electric parking brake control which does take a bit of getting used to and might be a candidate for trouble in future. That said, it does apply the parking brakes far more firmly than a human arm, so there shouldn't be many cases of Scenics rolling away and becoming part of the scenery.
Child seats that fit a Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009)Our unique Car Seat Chooser shows you which child car seats will fit this car and which seat positions that they will fit, so that you don't have to check every car seat manufacturer's website for compatibility.
What's the Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009) like to drive?
The Scenic succeeded a Megane Sport Tourer and surprised me by out-handling it. Really, there's not much between this new Scenic and the Ford Focus C-Max. Except that the Renault boys invented this category of car, and have very obviously put everything they learned from the old Scenic into the new one.
So it's now a proper five-seater, rather than a four plus one. It has a Renault hands-free keycard, so you just walk up to the car, open the door and press a button to start the engine. No fiddling around with keys when you're getting in or getting out. The front passenger seatback folds forwards to make a table or an extended load platform. The dash is modern, digital with the readings in the centre. There's an optional lifting rear window so you can just dump stuff in the back without opening the big, heavy hatch. The car scored a full five stars in the NCAP crash tests.
The mammoth lists down below give the equipment and spec variations, so no point in repeating them here. It's very practical. Very comfortable. Rides well (on sensible 60 profile tyres). Handles well. Goes well. These are all aspects that can be dispassionately measured.
But the thing that surprised me was that the car I drove had real character. I simply liked it. That's not something I expected to write about a Renault. And it has a five star NCAP crash safety rating.
|1.4 16V||39 mpg||14.3 s||171–173 g/km|
|1.5 dCi 106||52–54 mpg||12.4–12.9 s||137–143 g/km|
|1.5 dCi 86||55 mpg||14.6 s||135–137 g/km|
|1.6 16V VVT||36–37 mpg||11.8–12.8 s||173–189 g/km|
|1.9 dCi||47 mpg||9.6–9.8 s||159–160 g/km|
|2.0 16V VVT||34–35 mpg||10.3–10.9 s||192–193 g/km|
|2.0 dCi||49 mpg||9.4–9.8 s||154 g/km|
Real MPG average for a Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009)
Real MPG was created following thousands of readers telling us that their cars could not match the official figures.
Real MPG gives real world data from drivers like you to show how much fuel a vehicle really uses.
Diesel or petrol? If you're unsure whether to go for a petrol or diesel (or even an electric model if it's available), then you need our Petrol or Diesel? calculator. It does the maths on petrols, diesels and electric cars to show which is best suited to you.
What have we been asked about the Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009)?
Every day we're asked hundreds of questions from car buyers and owners through Ask Honest John. Our team of experts, including the nation's favourite motoring agony uncle - Honest John himself - answer queries and conudrums ranging from what car to buy to how to care for it as an owner. If you could do with a spot of friendly advice before buying you're next car, get in touch and we'll do what we can to help.
Is a turbo 'whistle' a symptom of turbo failure?
What Cars Are Similar To The Renault Scenic (2003 – 2009)?
Unclear on what your next car should be? Use our Car Chooser to pick something that suits your needs.
What do owners think?
Our view gives your our opinion, based on driving hundreds of cars every year, but you can't beat the views of someone who lives with a car day-in, day out.
- 5 star
- 4 star
- 3 star 50%
- 2 star
- 1 star 50%