Computer Related Questions-Volume 204 [Read only] - Dynamic Dave

***** This thread is now closed, please CLICK HERE to go to Volume 205 *****


In this thread you may ask any computer related question for which you need help, advice, suggestions or whatever.

Usual rules apply,

No motoring related discussion,
No politics,
No Speeding, speed cameras, traffic calming
No arguments or slanging matches
Nothing which we think is not following the spirit of the thread
Nothing that risks the future of this site (please see the small print for details www.honestjohn.co.uk/credits/index.htm )

Any of the above will be deleted. If the thread becomes difficult to maintain it will simply be removed.

There is a wealth of knowledge in here, much of which is not motoring related, but most of which is useful.

This is Volume 204. Previous Volumes will not be deleted.

A list of previous volumes can be found by clicking Here

PLEASE NOTE:

When posting a NEW question, please "Reply to" the first message in this thread, i.e. this one. This keeps each question in it's own separate segment and stops each new question from getting mixed up in amongst existing questions. Also please remember to change the subject header.

Edited by Dynamic Dave on 10/12/2009 at 19:20

Slow Bootup (previous volume) - Stuartli
1) Go to control panel then system it will answer both those questions (RAM and CPU)>>

Much easier to right click on My Computer icon>Properties>General tab.

SUPERAntispyware (free version) doesn't need to be running, just open daily and check for updates. Run a scan about once a week.

Edited by Stuartli on 08/12/2009 at 23:26

Slow Bootup (previous volume) - jbif
Slow Bootup (previous volume) >>


drbe: The independent tests below were on PCs running XP and Vista -

www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/09/29/review_pc_tune_up.../
" .... Our testing produced very little evidence that registry fixers and third-party defragmenters do any good at all, although other users with serious computer problems may experience otherwise. There is definitely the risk of choosing the wrong option - which was our experience with Fix-it Utilities 9 and Desktop Maestro 3.0 - and then getting significantly worse performance.
All the utilities were, however, able to shave a few seconds off our start-times, but not by using their one-click tools. Instead, you have to explicitly disable services and applications to get the increase in performance. It’s worth remembering that you can also run msconfig, from XP's Run box, to disable start up programs, although you get a barebones interface with no guidance. .... "

www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/10/08/review_pc_tune_up.../
" .... You will, however, get a boost by using the more detailed tools to switch off unused services and forgotten programs, although this is one way of reducing functionality. When we were testing the apps on Windows XP, we found we could shave a good 18 seconds off our startup time with every tune-up application on test by laboriously turning off unused programs and services, but with Vista this improved by 44 seconds after we selected 14 programs and services that we weren’t using any more, or had never used.
Meddling with the registry and Windows services is a tricky game, with Desktop Maestro in particular coming a cropper several times by pushing performance in the wrong direction. The other applications represent less of a risk and, besides, you can always restore an old registry if things go wrong.
Ultimately, we can say if you’re trying to reduce your Windows start-up time, extra Ram will help if you don’t have a lot - 512MB, say - while tune-up applications may help you find more performance if you have 2GB or more. ... "

Edited by jbif on 09/12/2009 at 00:14

Slow Bootup (previous volume) - billy25
Spybot s/d has a very useful built-in start-up manager that actually gives descriptions for the things you are running at start-up, and tells you if they are needed or can be safely turned off.
Find it by changing to "advanced" mode -->tools-->start-up manager. To see descriptions, click the arrow bar on the right side of the window area.
hth

Bily
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - drbe
Thanks to everyone for all the helpful replies.

I am not sure where this leaves me. Tinkering with the start-up menu has made little or no difference. Computer magazine tests seem to show that the only sure-fire way of getting more speed is to get more RAM. QED?

So is it worth buying more RAM, or should I just learn to live with what I've got?

My PC tells me that I have 448MB of RAM - that doesn't sound very much.

Should I buy some more RAM? How much would it cost? Could a PC know nothing like me install it?
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - rtj70
More memory will make a difference even if it does not improve boot times. It is very easy to install.

You'd need to work out what type of memory you need. If it's a system from a known brand then there are websites like crucial which will tell you what sort of memory you need.

I think you mentioned you had an Athlon 64 in the last thread so memory ought to be added in pairs for performance (depends on the exact Athlon CPU and system board mind). You could put in 2Gb of RAM (2 x 1Gb) DDR2 for about £40.

The odd amount of RAM you have suggests you have integrated graphics which is using the missing 64MB of RAM. The system currently has a total of 512Mb with 64Mb used for the graphics.
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - jbif
... So is it worth buying more RAM, or should I just learn to live with what I've got? .... Could a PC know nothing like me install it? .... >>


RAM upgrade is usually the cheapest, easiest, quickest method to upgrade the performance of a PC. After that, your next step might be to make a full backup of your hard drive and then re-install your system, programs, and data; but this time leave out all the non-essential stuff from it.

However, before anyone can give you a tailored reply on what to do, you ought to give the make/model/specifications of your system. (In other words, just as when asking a question in the motoring technical questions it is helpful to know the make/model/specification of the car, similarly it is helpful to know the details of your PC).

Slow Bootup (previous volume) - Altea Ego
Extra ram will make a difference in overall performance, but may have minimal effect on boot-up times. The one sure fired way to really crack that boot up time down, is to reformat your primary hard drive and re-install Windows.
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - theterranaut
I can recommend this:

www.mlin.net/StartupMonitor.shtml

For disabling unwanted startup items. Free if you dont want to bung the author, Mike Lin, some money. Buts its worth doing.

Nicer to use IMHO than msconfig etc.

tt
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - ifithelps
I'm sure some of us are wondering what the boot-up time should be.

My laptop runs Vista Home Premium and has 2GB of RAM.

It takes a little more than two minutes from pressing the 'on' button to being able to see my internet home page.

That's not too bad, is it?

Edited by ifithelps on 09/12/2009 at 17:48

Slow Bootup (previous volume) - Pugugly
45 seconds including password entry on an AppleMacBook Pro - says a lot about Windows I think.
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - Stuartli
>>That's not too bad, is it?>>

My XP Pro system boots up in about a third of that time...:-)

What's more I start to get bored waiting for it to do so......:-))
Slow Bootup (previous volume) - rtj70
And why for Windows it's worth using Hibernate or even sleep.

I use sleep on the iMac but switched it's default behaviour so more like an Apple laptop. It's sleeps but writes memory to disk too. Instant turn on but nothing lost if power goes. A boot of the iMac is about 40s to a logged in desktop but starting up two email clients (one private and one for here), iTunes, Calendar, Skype, etc. takes a minute or so longer.
Windows Authorisation - helicopter
What happens if Windows is not authorised on a computer and we have not got the product key?

One of our work computers had a problem which involved it having to be reloaded with Windows. The company who supplied are no longer in business and we have no record of the product key for the Windows which they installed. Its around 6 years old but is still quite usable although I am ordering a new Dell to replace it.

The Windows disk we used was one loaded on another computer in the office and we keep getting a message up that Windows needs to be authorised in the next four days. I just wondered what happens if it is not authorised?

Anybody out there know? I tried to find a phone line to talk to a person rather than a machine at Microsoft but no joy...
Windows Authorisation - rtj70
Is a valid product key not on the Microsoft/Windows sticker on the system itself. Or was this a home made PC made from parts?

It is possible to extract the product key stored on the system but it sounds like one was never entered for this system.
Windows Authorisation - helicopter
Unfortunately it was a hand built one and we have no contact with the bulders of the system ( who went bust ) and no product key sticker on the box as we have with later machines..

I'm just intrigued as to what will happen in four days time if it is not authorised ? .... Do Microsoft put in a self destruct chip???.
Windows Authorisation - Rattle
You've been a victim of fraud.

When it expires I believe it gives you an option to purchase a legal licence which won't be cheap.

A lot of home built computers have been scrapped for this reason. I hate them and when I open them up sometimes there is some nasty horrors like power supplies and cheap memory.

No wonder he went bust :).
Windows Authorisation - jbif
I just wondered what happens if it is not authorised? ... ....

Anybody out there know? I tried to find a phone line to talk to a person rather than a machine at Microsoft but no joy.. >>

Some answers (including UK phone number) here:
www.microsoft.com/uk/licensing/lessthan250/deploy-...x
www.microsoft.com/uk/licensing/lessthan250/deploy-...x
The company who supplied are no longer in business and we have no record of the product key for the Windows which they installed. >>


Some local PC supply companies (many have since been shut down due to MS court action) were in the habit of using stolen corporate volume licence keys to get around the activation process.

If as it seems your PC had its disk wiped to reinstall XP, your old licence will have gone with the reformat. If you do not have a sticker on the PC case with the licence number, you will probably find that the MS call centre will tell you that you cannot activate your PC and that you need to buy a new licence (they may not sell you an XP one and instead may ask you to buy Win7).

Edited by jbif on 09/12/2009 at 11:48

Windows Authorisation - Rattle
You can still buy XP so that won't be a problem.

Its actually a very common problem and I explain to my customers if I have no legal COA and see WGA etc all over the place they need to purchase a licence because if I have to do anything to windows I can't.

Ita also very common to find machines with XP Pro on it and are showing up WGA all over the place but have a valid XP Home licence on the case!
Windows Authorisation - Andy P
Yep - you'll need to either buy a licence (about £90 from Microsoft) or buy an OEM version of XP for less.
Windows Authorisation - Rattle
The OEM licence is not strictly legal either but MS do turn a blind eye especialy in homes. It is far better than having a dodgy copy. The OEM version is supposed to be for brand new PCs, if I built a PC I would buy the OEM copy.

Microdirect are selling the retail copy of Windows 7 for around £85 the last time I checked, which is very good value because it can be moved around to another PC if this one dies unlike the OEM version which is locked to the motherboard.
Windows Authorisation - jbif
I'm just intrigued as to what will happen in four days time if it is not authorised ? .... Do Microsoft put in a self destruct chip?? >>


Google: "what happens if I do not activate genuine windows".

Windows Authorisation - maz64
FWIW free utility to extract your Windows CD key:
www.magicaljellybean.com/keyfinder/

Edited by Focus {P} on 09/12/2009 at 11:56

Windows Authorisation - Stuartli
If you install Belarc Advisor (free version), it will list the Product Key in the full list of information about your system, hardware and software.

Due to US Government requirements, it will also state the security standard (or otherwise) of your system with regard to MS updates etc.

See:

www.belarc.com/free_download.html

I've had it installed for years - it is updated by the company on a regular basis.
Windows Authorisation - jbif
FWIW free utility to extract your Windows CD key: www.magicaljellybean.com/keyfinder/ >>


It will have to be magical to find the keys on a disk with a reinstalled system. ;-)

re. Belarc Advisor, if you do use it, make sure you do not store your results like some foolish people do - Google: "Belarc Advisor XP keys Google is not your friend" to see what I mean.

Edited by jbif on 09/12/2009 at 12:30

Windows Authorisation - idle_chatterer
It's probably been said elsewhere but:

If you don't need to run any software which is Windows only then install Linux (my current favourite is Ubuntu) and Open Office, they're free and every bit as good as XP IMHO, also you have an online community to support you.

Open Office can handle your spreadsheets, presentation etc, Firefox and Thunderbird will do the web stuff, email and calendaring and it's all fairly easy to use even for a habitual Msft user. All will inter-operate with Msft formats too.
Windows Authorisation - bell boy
idle_chatterer i use linux at home but linux mint
i can use some microsoft based software via wine
i did this to listen to spotify but even this is simple these days on the mint as there is a straight forward programme to download
Windows Authorisation - maz64
>> FWIW free utility to extract your Windows CD key: www.magicaljellybean.com/keyfinder/ >>
It will have to be magical to find the keys on a disk with a
reinstalled system. ;-)


AFAIK it extracts it from the registry ie. CD not required.
Windows Authorisation - crunch_time
A useful bit of freeware is What's Running - it not only tells you what the name implies, it also shows the program(s) associated with what is often an obscure name, etc..


Windows Authorisation - Rattle
I do like Linux and now use it on two machines. Got Ubunto on my personal laptop and Mint running on my business machine with NTFS installed. It is a great way of slaving clients hard drives who have route kits on it.

However as a main PC I think Linux would drive me mad. Its perfect for specialist systems or an internet box but for there is just too much Windows programs which will not run under Wine. That said for most people Linux is actually more suitable than Windows.


Windows Authorisation - idle_chatterer
That said for most people Linux is actually more
suitable than Windows.


Of course it depends on the use you make of it, my work laptop is dual boot Ubuntu and Vista64, I actually quite like them both.

The kids PCs are Ubuntu, old laptop (for web browsing mostly) is Mint (derived from Ubuntu of course) then we have a ubiquitous Windows XP PC too.

My contention is that for most uses (e.g. if you don't need MS Visio or some web-app with ActiveX) then Ubuntu / Mint with OO is just fine and completely free, there's a huge catalogue of free software to do accounts, drawing or whatever else too. I don't generally use WINE and have opted for Eclipse based versions of other licensed software.

People should understand that their DVD recorder, broadband router and possibly even their phone are probably running Linux, in user-friendy forms such as Ubuntu it's about as easy to use as XP too.
Windows Authorisation - rtj70
I have a VB Script that extracts the Windows key from the registry - it's there but encoded.

But if the system is not activated then it possibly does not have a proper key in use anyway.
Windows Authorisation - Rattle
Jellybeans does the job perfectly but I tend not never use it unless the client has proof they have a proper licence. There is too many ilegal used COAs which pass validation. It is a major problem mostly because business customers seem to think they have a genuine licence but after questioning it turns out they have been ripped off and are using another companies licence.

I am studying my Microsoft qualifications in the new year so I will understand this corperate licence mine field better then.
Windows Authorisation - theterranaut
Rattle old son- a place I used to work in used to employ someone to particularly look after MS licences. Back when I was MS cert'ed, there wasn't much licence stuff in the coursework, other than some info about cpu licences and Terminal Services. So you might not find that it teaches you as much as you might think.

Licencing is a bit of a minefield.

Re Ubuntu- just been out and bought myself a new Nvidia GPU, as Ubuntu (and maybe other Debians. inc Mint, and probably Linux in general) dont deal with ATI GPUs well on account of ATIs strange approach to driver releases for non-MS.

Windows Authorisation - rtj70
Licencing is a bit of a minefield.


Windows licensing, especially for clients is worse than it ever was. Not many in Microsoft can provide answers. So I doubt this will be covered in any technical courses.
Windows Authorisation - jbif
AFAIK it extracts it from the registry ie. CD not required. >>


Focus, AFAIK, for a key to be extracted from Registry, the key has to have been put there in the first place.

So I'll say it again, in reply to your post
"FWIW free utility to extract your Windows CD key: www.magicaljellybean.com/keyfinder/ " >>


that it will have to be magical to find the keys on a disk with a reinstalled system. ;-)

Edited by jbif on 09/12/2009 at 15:01

Windows Authorisation - maz64
Focus AFAIK for a key to be extracted from Registry the key has to have
been put there in the first place.


Ok, I misunderstood your post...
So I'll say it again


...but give me some credit :-)
Windows Authorisation - billy25
I`ve just read (somewhere) that providing you have a pc with a valid product key, you are eligible to a free upgrade to Windows 7. As Windows 7 eula allows installation on up to 3 machines, why not use the valid key from one of the later machines, and install a valid copy of Windows 7 on the problem pc?
Windows Authorisation - billy25
Ahh! - heres the article!


tinyurl.com/yzeszsh

Windows Authorisation - rtj70
But you cannot upgrade from XP to Windows 7. It needs to be a clean install.
Windows Authorisation - billy25
Aparently you can - unless i`ve read it wrong.

quote

No trick needed to upgrade a pirated OS to Win7

As part of my pursuit of truth, justice, and the American way, I tested a Windows 7 upgrade DVD on a PC that I knew had a pirated copy of Windows XP. This particularly sorry piece of hardware had never seen a licensed copy of Windows in its life. The PC might as well have been flying a skull-and-crossbones flag and displaying its "You may be the victim of software counterfeiting" notice like a badge of honor.

Since the machine didn't really have much of an OS to begin with, I decided to take Microsoft's advice for installing Win7 on a PC with no operating system at all. I booted the PC from a genuine, paid-for upgrade DVD. The Win7 installer kicked in with no problem. During installation, I typed in the activation key. Win7 activated immediately once I was connected to the Internet. Go figger.

unquote
Windows Authorisation - SpamCan61 {P}
>>I booted the PC from a genuine, paid-for upgrade DVD.

I think the poster is saying they managed to install a legit Win7 over a dodgy XP ,but the Win7 was paid for.
Windows Authorisation - jbif
...but give me some credit :-) >>

Focus -
No worries, I'll give you that; and I agree that I had not made it absolutely crystal clear that apparently the OP had reinstalled XP but without a serial-key for it.
I`ve just read (somewhere) that providing you have a pc with a valid product key, you are eligible to a free upgrade to Windows 7. >>

billy25
Please tell us where (As you've only just read it, surely you know where?). I think wherever you read it, they were telling porkies or MS have suddenly gone soft in the head and are giving away their new product free of charge!

Windows Authorisation - billy25
Sorry! me did mis-read it! - the upgrade is not free, however it is a lot cheaper than buying an "off the shelf" full-install version.
I also stand corrected on the install over XP option! - it can be done without the need to reformat, and allowing you to keep all your files and settings, but its not a straightfoward procedure, you have first to upgrade XP --> Vista, and then upgrade again to 7.

Hey ho good ole `98!!


Windows Authorisation - rtj70
As Windows 7 eula allows installation on up to 3 machines


You do mean the Family edition of Windows 7 allows you to install on up to 3 machines. This version being more expensive than a single copy but less expensive than buying three separate copies.
Windows Authorisation - jbif
>>... Family edition of Windows 7 allows you to install on up to 3 machines. This version being more expensive than a single copy but less expensive than buying three separate copies. >>

available in limited quantities only:
www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/12/07/win7_family_p.../
" ... Microsoft have now been in touch, to confirm that UK families better get their skates, as the offer is for a limited time, and “ The UK offer will close once all stocks of the Family Pack have been purchased." "

Windows Authorisation - colinh
"..As Windows 7 eula allows installation on up to 3 machines..."

Doesn't the 3 licences only apply if you have bought the "Family Pack" for Home Premium?

The normal Win7 Home Premiun is marked "for use on one computer or device"
Windows Authorisation - theterranaut
I believe that regardless of how it got there, any Windows install has some kind of product key. It might have been inserted by an OEM, it might be from a corporate disc, but there'll be some kind of key.

Jellybean most definitely reads it from the registry, chaps.

Windows Authorisation - Altea Ego
I believe that regardless of how it got there any Windows install has some kind
of product key. It might have been inserted by an OEM it might be from
a corporate disc but there'll be some kind of key.
Jellybean most definitely reads it from the registry chaps.


Which is fab, really, Except its pulling a key out the registry that wont authenticate with MS because its known bogus.
Windows Authorisation - theterranaut
"Except its pulling a key out the registry that wont authenticate with MS because its known bogus.".

The OP said this? I must have missed that part.
Windows Authorisation - jbif
I believe that regardless of how it got there, any Windows install has some kind of product key. It might have been inserted by an OEM, it might be from a corporate disc, but there'll be some kind of key. >>


theterranaut: Not necessarily, apparently, if you install XP+SP3 - see below.

Until the OP clears up a few points, we can all speculate as to how he got where he is at. Let us assume he is not talking about a corporate VLK XP.

As I understand it, he has reinstalled XP on the PC. He says he has no serial-key for it.

Therefore, I have surmised that he has installed XP+SP3 using the new MS procedure quoted below:
"January 2, 2008. - With Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3), Microsoft is changing its Product Activation policy to match that of Windows Vista, giving users a 30-day period of grace before they have to enter a Product Key."

Therefore, try as he might, no amount of jellybean magic is going to find a key in the registry.

On the other hand, if the OP has installed an old version of XP,then the following used to apply:
XP+SP1 and XP+SP2 versions of "Windows XP require users to enter their Product Key during installation as part of the Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) anti-piracy feature. Failure to do so halts the installation."

So the 4 days deadline he is talking about could well be to do with "Activation" :
"If you have not yet activated Windows XP, you can initiate activation at any time by clicking the Windows Activation icon in the system tray. Once you have activated Windows XP, this icon disappears from the system tray. If you choose not to activate, reminders will appear periodically during the next 30 days. After that time has expired, you will be required to activate in order to continue to use Windows."

Edited by jbif on 09/12/2009 at 20:45

Windows Authorisation - theterranaut
Thanks jbif, didn't know that.
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - Alanovich
Looking through the various posts about Ubuntu/Mint, it has crossed my mind that I have an old PIII laptop with (I think) 128MB RAM at home which is loaded with XP and is painfully slow.

Would it be quicker if it was running Ubuntu/Mint? If so it might be an idea to install that instead of XP.

But how does one do that? Is it a case of downloading it to the laptop from t'interweb and just running an executable file or something? Then, once it's installed, how does one get a web browser on it? Will that have to come from a CD or summat?
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - rtj70
If you want to try Linux without installing, download the ISO file from the website. So for Ubuntu go to the Ubuntu website's download area.

Then burn this ISO (a CD sized 700Mb) on to a blank disk and boot from this on the laptop. If you want to install this, the same CD can be used to install it.

If you go with Ubuntu it will come with Firefox as standard.
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - Alanovich
Thanks.
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - bell boy
Alanovich i suggest you go for the mint version
its more easy to understand than the ubunto
www.findmysoft.com/news/Download-Linux-Mint-7-Glor.../
it seems to load as an iso better on a cdrw as well i find, but that might just be me
finally it takes me about 45 minutes to download it at home and i find it easier to drop the bits onto the cd rewrite part rather than letting the operating system find it if that makes sense

let us know how you get on
remember you might have to change the bios at start up so the cd is seen as a hard drive on boot up
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - Alanovich
Thanks BB. Does Mint have a web browser? If not, how does one get on the interent using Mint?
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - SpamCan61 {P}
Funnily enough I just found an old P3 laptop in a cupboard and wondered about putting some version of Ubuntu on it. Some flavours of Linux include frequently used apps. as part of the download - like easypeasy which I've stuck on my Acer Netbook. otherwise you need to install the approriate version of web browser, FireFox is generally easy.

Ubuntu system requirements are documented here:-

help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequi...s

Installing Ubuntu/Mint - bell boy
pre installed firefox mozilla but i always load it with opera as i prefer the ability to blow car pictures up quickly while viewing online
if you use a lan cable for internet it identifies this too

ive often recommended this too for internet browsing it runs off your ram so even if the hard drive was kaput you can surf
puppylinux.org/main/index.php?file=Download%20Late...m

Edited by bell boy on 09/12/2009 at 16:08

Installing Ubuntu/Mint - Alanovich
Ah. I currently have a wireless connection for the laptop. Does it recognise these automatically? My router is temporarily in a corner of a spare bedroom (not the most sociable placeto be sat), as bizarrely there is no phone point in the study (moved in recently, haven't got round to wiring one in yet).
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - bell boy
i am not sure as im a hardwired man
however there are facilities to wireless but it might be more difficult than loading from a disc
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - Altea Ego
The latest version of ubunto are pretty resource hungry and will make a laptop that runs XP slowly, into a real turtle.

I tried it on a PIII 600 with 128mb. I could write faster than the operating system.

I suggest one of the linux distrinutions compiled for older or slower hardware.

Edited by Altea Ego on 09/12/2009 at 16:15

Installing Ubuntu/Mint - rtj70
It probably comes with Firefox as standard. Try downloading the ISO, burning to disk and booting from the CD.

And enjoy the difference.

If it didn't come with a browser there will be plenty of choice including Firefox, Opera, Chrome and Safari.
Installing Ubuntu/Mint - rtj70
AE is write about the latest versions getting bloated. I'd not go for anything newer than Ubuntu 8.04 and even then that might be too resource hungry.

I first ran Linux (Slackware) in 1993 in 8Mb RAM and it was far faster than Windows 3.11 back then. So Linux will run easily on low spec hardware if you get a version that is not too hungry for resources.

At least you won't have to load from about 30 floppy disks and programme the video driver to work on your monitor like I did then.
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - Alby Back
I have a laptop upstairs somewhere which doesn't work. It has to be at least seven years old, maybe more. I was given it by someone I'm no longer in contact with. It switches on and tries to do stuff but it's clearly not very well. Given its age, would it be economically viable to have its innards removed and replaced to use as a notebook / spare ?
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - rtj70
would it be economically viable to have its innards removed and replaced to use as a
notebook / spare


No. You'd need the replacement motherboard to be from the same source and likely to cost as much as a new laptop. You cannot swap laptop components like you do a desktop.

What's the problem with it though. It could be simple to fix.
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - Alby Back
Not sure really...It ...um...doesn't work. Maybe I'll take it to someone who can fix it or condemn it ! I suspect it's running Windows 1952....
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - rtj70
I think I'd scrap it then. It is seven years old and not working.
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - Alby Back
Fair enough. Ta for the opinion.
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - rtj70
Step-son has an old Mac iBook G4 (given to him) and it was not working last week. He brought it home for me to have a look at. With all the symptoms I found out due to a design flaw where a power cable goes over a chip, the system board can be damaged.

After taking it apart and fitting something between heat shield and the chip to put some pressure on it, it works again. For how long who knows. The cost to replace a system board in a 5 year old laptop will be more than a new laptop!
7+ year old laptop - worth fixing ? - SpamCan61 {P}
If it's a hardware problem then scrap it. Maybe worth trying some sort of Linux LiveCD in it first in case it's just a software problem.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - oilrag
I found myself in a store, looking at two identical notebooks, one with XP and the other Starter 7. (£10 difference in price.)

Both were switched on at the same time and XP seemed to boot up a few seconds faster than 7. (a long wait for both though contrasted with Linux on the Eec Pc 701SD)

I tried to explore both operating systems and found I preferred XP to 7.

What`s it all about then? I was thinking of getting a Windows notebook with a slightly larger screen then the Eec..

With the Linux on the Eec you can just press F9 on boot and after a couple of safety prompts, it formats the drive and then completely re-installs the operating system in around one minute.
Does Starter 7 do that? and does it come on a CD (as with the Eec Pc) so that you can put it on from an external optical drive if the restore partition on the disc fails?

I don`t need antivirus on the Eec, but I assume it`s still essential to 7?

What`s the point then over XP? Is this ten years or so of development?

I`m clearly missing something - but if I were to buy a windows notebook - XP or 7?



Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - oilrag
Just to add. I have actually more or less convinced myself I should stick with the Eec Pc. Seeing row after row of Norton at around £50 a go was a real turn off. I know that there are free options but I felt like i would be turning into a cow that needed regular `milking`

I was tempted to grab a computer with XP on though while still available.... Having bought Vista on the previous laptop - been told it was a massive stride forwards - then later that it was a stop gap and 7 is the massive stride forwards after all.

I guess someone who bought one of the first computers with XP on, nine years ago, must be laughing their socks off to see new notebooks allegedly booting up slower with 7.


Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - Rattle
When Windows XP came out it was actually very flawd. Setup a new XP system with no service packs e.g 5.0000 and disable all the firewall functions of your router, wait a few hours and watch all the viruses infect your new system.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - Altea Ego
>When Windows XP came out it was actually very flawd

When windows xp came out it was the dog danglers Remarkably rock solid, fast and good to use
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - Stuartli
>>Remarkably rock solid, fast and good to use>>

..and is still very much so.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - Rattle
Windows XP still has a lot more security flaws than Windows 7. Even with all the updates XP is still has far too many weakenesses.

It also won't support some of the same hardware that 7 will.

I would go for the Linux or Windows 7 one.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - oilrag
Hi Rattle. My wife`s old desktop has XP, I put it together for her a few years ago using a AsRock motherboard, although i can`t now remember the detail on that.

I put a copy of Acronis True Image on it and set it to revert the drive every time it shut down. It`s never had antivirus on and she visits lots of sites that give concern, such as in the Philippines and accepting files off Yahoo and so on. But all of this is gone every boot up and it`s back to a clean slate.
Typically I suspend the reverting every holiday to put new photo`s on and then sometimes catch up with the Windows security updates. I have at times run an online scan and temporarily put a free antivirus on - only to revert it off again. Nothing has ever been found on the computer and after 5 or 6 years the operating system is pristine as a result of always reverting back to it`s previous state when switched on.

I have often wondered why why Windows systems don`t have this as standard as it`s impossible to mess up the operating system - let the kids do what they want - It`s back to a clean slate at every switch on. Of course the Acronis is password locked though ;-)

Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - oilrag
Just as a back up to this system, I have also cloned the hard drive and keep it in the loft. I reckon it would be a quick job to swap that drive in, then format and clone either the original or a new drive and store that. This is my approach to saving hours of work putting dozens of my wife`s applications and files back on.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - SpamCan61 {P}
Personally I'm happy with XP SP3, Win7 does nothing new I need, obviously Microsoft want me to buy the shiny new product hence it's very difficult to get XP on a new machine other than a netbook.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - idle_chatterer
Seems a tad drastic, why not just use AVG Free on your XP machine ?

Personally I'm converted to Ubuntu, Mint has advantages but my laptop is up to running Karmic which is stable and performs well.

I'd personally go for Windows 7 (if I needed Msft) on anything with a multi-core processor, I abandoned XP on my Core 2 duo because of the number of strange hangs it got and the fact that certain software actually ran faster if you pinned it to one logical CP - implies poor multiprocessing design in the XP Kernel to me.

So, net of it is - if it's a new machine go for Windows 7, if it's older then XP is fine but both have a near zero cost alternative in Linux which is a lot less vulnerable to viruses.
Buy a new notebook? XP, 7, or continue Linux? - ifithelps
I'm no great fan of Windows, but I do like to use wireless hotspots, particularly the free ones.

Logging on to a hotspot is a bit hit and miss with a machine using Linux, in my experience.

For that reason, it would be Windows for me.
XP problem - something's on the desktop - maz64
My Mum rang me to ask what she's done to her XP desktop. I managed to get her to make some pictures:
i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae173/focushj/desk_pro...g
i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae173/focushj/desk_pro...g

It looks like 'My Computer' has attached itself to the left hand side of the screen. She can drag it across, but can't actually get rid of it.

I use XP sometimes but Linux mainly, so can anyone more familiar with XP spot what she's done, and how she can undo it?
XP problem - something's on the desktop - Stuartli
It's likely that the Desktop Icons settings have been inadvertently altered.

If your Mum right clicks on an empty area of the Desktop>Arrange Icons By..>and selects Align to Grid (a tick will appear), she will/should be able to drag and drop icons to wherever they are required on the screen.

The My Computer icon (or any other) can (though can't see why this is required) normally be deleted by right clicking on the icon>Delete.
XP problem - something's on the desktop - maz64
It's likely that the Desktop Icons settings have been inadvertently altered.


Sorry Stuartli - I should have added my clarification earlier (below). I think the icons are ok - see first image. This looks like something else.
XP problem - something's on the desktop - maz64
Just to clarify:
i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae173/focushj/desk_pro...g

You can see a white stripe down the left hand side of the desktop - this is the 'My Computer' thing as small as Mum can make it.
i969.photobucket.com/albums/ae173/focushj/desk_pro...g

Mum has dragged the right hand edge of the My Computer thing approx half way across the desktop (and is also running IE).
XP problem - something's on the desktop - maz64
Well after having had a play on an XP PC it looks a bit like what you get if you unlock the Taskbar, enable the option to display the Quick Launch bar, and drag said bar over to the left hand side of the screen.

But it doesn't say 'My Computer' at the top like it does in the second picture of Mum's desktop.
XP problem - something's on the desktop - jbif
Well after having had a play on an XP PC it looks a bit like ..... like it does in the second picture of Mum's desktop. >>

Focus: It looks like she has expanded the "my computer" window beyond the upper and lower edges of her desktop.
Ask your Mum to
1. See if she can drag the "my computer" window/box to the right, the maximum amount possible.
2. Then using all the sides, adjust the box to be a somewhat smaller than desktop rectangular shape contained within the desktop area.
3. Then close the "my computer" window.
4. Then lock the taskbar.

Now test everything is OK (reopen "my computer" by clicking on its icon or from start>my computer, then close "my computer" window).

If all that fails, try using a restore point from a few days before the problem occurred.

Edited by jbif on 09/12/2009 at 23:42

XP problem - something's on the desktop - Stuartli
I use the Classic version of XP and, in that mode, this would likely to have been a case of accidentally dropping and dragging My Computer to the side - it is possible to reverse such an occurance.

However, as jbif points out, a System Restore to just before it happened may cure it. You should then be able to return to the original System Restore point without affecting the required screen appearance.
XP problem - something's on the desktop - maz64
I use the Classic version of XP and in that mode this would likely to
have been a case of accidentally dropping and dragging My Computer to the side -
it is possible to reverse such an occurance.


You've hit the nail on the head Stuartli - just dragging the My Computer icon from the Start menu to the left hand side of the screen duplicates what Mum is seeing (seems to work in XP mode), And as with the Quick Launch thing I mentioned above, closing it is simply a matter of right-clicking and selecting 'close toolbar'.

Still waiting to talk to her, but hopefully that's fixed it.

Cheers
F

EDIT just noticed this appears above my reply to jbif (below), which I posted earlier.

Edited by Focus {P} on 10/12/2009 at 09:09

XP problem - something's on the desktop - maz64
Focus: It looks like she has expanded the "my computer" window beyond the upper and
lower edges of her desktop.


Pretty sure it's not that - if you try doing what I mentioned above, dragging the Quick Launch bar to the left hand side of the screen (taskbar must be unlocked), you get the effect shown in the images apart from the contents are different (you see the Quick Launch contents rather than drives). The right hand side of this 'window' can be dragged to the right and back, but you can't adjust the top and bottom.

However, if you right click on the Quick Launch 'window' you get the option to 'close the task bar' (IIRC - currently on linux), and it might be as simple as that. I haven't been able to contact her yet, but fingers crossed.

Otherwise we might try the restore point, but that feels like cheating :-)
BE broadband - Rattle
Anybody got any experience? My AOL (free laptop deal) contract has expired and now want to change to a proper ISP. Be's pro package has everything I need, 20mbps download, static IP unlimited with fair usage (what it this in reality?) but it seems cheap at £21 plus VAT per month.

I normally recommend Zen but its too expensive for us due to our high bandwidth needs. I will need to use between 50 and 80GB a month as I do watch a lot of streaming videos as well as download a lot of ISOs (linux).

Any recommendations other than Be?

I do not use ilegal P2P or anything so I am not bothered if they check for that or not.

BE broadband - rtj70
as well as download a lot of ISOs (linux)


How many new releases of Linux installs come out each month Rattle? You're not downloading each time I hope ;-)

Why do you need a static IP? Most ISPs don't give static (although mine hasn't changed it years). But you can always use some sort of dynamic DNS updating from the router to a DNS service to register the allocated address.
BE broadband - Stuartli
I've been with TalkTalk for just under four years on its (now unavailable) AnyTime Global package (up to 8MB, free any time UK and international phone calls and around 6.5 to 7.3MB average speeds).

Its Pro package is similar to Be with up to 24MB speeds and "unlimited" downloads:

tinyurl.com/m4gths

or you can tailor the Essentials package to suit requirements using the Boosts feature.

Despite what some say about TalkTalk, I've found it to be supremely reliable and the financial savings over separate broadband and phone services remarkable (line rental is the same as BT).

You do have to have a BT line, which I assume is also the case with AOL (also under the Carphone Warehouse umbrella).
BE broadband - Rattle
AOL is TalkTalk it is the same network (since CPW bought out AOL in the UK).

Its been ok but reliability has been flaky and I am sure we can do better for the money.

Rob its mainly because ISOs are handy for my job, I like to try out different live CDs too that said I probably only download about 1.2 GB worth of ISOs a month, compared with 1 hour of Iplayer a day that is nothing.

A static IP address is not essential but will make configuring my VIOP phone (ethernet) easier without having to start configure the router to work with it. It is also useful for Apache but again there are ways round it.

I will have a look at that Talktalk package, it depends on the contract too, ideally want 12 months at the very most.

Edited by Rattle on 10/12/2009 at 10:17

BE broadband - Stuartli
>>It's been ok but reliability has been flaky and I am sure we can do better for the money.>>

You can't compare AOL with TalkTalk as CPW allowed AOL to retain its autonomy after the takeover.

>>AOL is TalkTalk it is the same network (since CPW bought out AOL in the UK).>>

I pointed that out in my last paragraph of my post...:-)

Edited by Stuartli on 10/12/2009 at 11:26

BE broadband - Rattle
But you connect to exactly the same network, dialbb (e.g Opal communications). Only the branding is different,
BE broadband - Stuartli
But you connect to exactly the same network dialbb (e.g Opal communications). Only the branding is different>>


Rest assured that the TalkTalk LLU service at my local exchange is top notch - I've several friends using TT (after my recommendations over the years) from the same exchange and they are equally happy...:-)

Incidentally, TT Enabled its LLU service at the exchange from 23/12/206 whilst AOL's came in on 5/11/2007.

As you may be aware, you can check out such information at:

www.samknows.com (Exchange Search)

Edited by Stuartli on 10/12/2009 at 12:43

BE broadband - rtj70
Rattle (and anyone else in Manchester) might want to hang fire moving ISP at the moment unless essential. BT are rolling out fibre to cabinet in some Manchester areas. Ours is being done now. When complete it will offer download speed of up to 40Mbps. Sky will be one company planning on using these new connections via Openreach.

BT won't say much about price or when it's available but the trials in London and South Wales finish early new year so one can assume it might be March timeframe. But I know in London they are having to move some of the new (taller) green cabinets due to not asking permission and putting them in conservation areas!

For me... after we eventually move into our planned new house, I'll probably stick to the reliable Virgin Media - it's been reliable for 10 years in our area and I can get up to 50Mbps and I prefer the TV service via V+ to Sky+.
BE broadband - Stuartli
Details of the BT 21CN roll out at your local exchange can be found at the SamKnows link provided by me earlier; just key in your local exchange into the Exchange Search box.
BE broadband - rtj70
Our exchange was done in 2008. But they are now laying the fibre to cabinet in our area (no mention on SamKnows about this for broadband). I have an idea of availability because I chatted to some of the Openreach engineers.
Broadband speed limited by distance to exchange - maz64
We are currently limited to 2Mb because of the distance to our exchange, which is this one:
www.samknows.com/broadband/exchange/THEAR

Is there technology on the horizon that might improve our speed?

(I know I've said in another thread that we're hoping to move next year, but I'm still curious.)
Broadband speed limited by distance to exchange - Altea Ego
We are currently limited to 2Mb because of the distance to our exchange

Is there technology on the horizon that might improve our speed?


Yes there is.
(I know I've said in another thread that we're hoping to move next year but
I'm still curious.)


It will arrive well after you move.....
Broadband speed limited by distance to exchange - rtj70
As AE says there is and it will probably a long time off for you - i.e. after you move. BT are rolling out fibre optic to cabinet which means broadband only travels on copper wires from your home to cabinet and then from there via fibre optic cables (similar to what Virgin Media has been doing for more than a decade now).

Because the distance to the cabinet is relatively short, you can get high speeds.
Broadband speed limited by distance to exchange - Stuartli
Ironic that with regard to distance, as your exchange is regarded as better than most for the number of ISPs providing a service. See:

See the last section of this link:

tinyurl.com/yjmkusa