Changing your company car this year? We have the pick of the bunch for 2015 | No thanks
Reviews  

Nissan Reviews

New Cars
Good: Great performance and wonderful engine. Seven-speed automatic transmission works well.
Bad: Visibility isn't good. Manual gearbox is clunky. Thirsty and expensive to run. Feeling dated.
Good: Great feelgood roadster. Looks and sounds great. V6 engine delivers muscular performance.
Bad: Firm ride on 19-inch wheels. High CO2 means expensive tax. Far from economical.
Good: Very comfortable and quiet,. Amazing running cost savings compared to diesel. Absolutely no compromise on space or versatility.
Bad: Range anxiety won’t quite go away.
Good: One of the quickest cars money can buy. Twin-turbo V6 develops 560PS. Good value compared to anything else as fast.
Bad: Automatic only. Not suited to traffic or driving in town. Needs a deft hand for wet weather driving. Interior quality and finish are poor given the price.
Good: Radical looks turn heads. Appealing mix between a hatch and an SUV. Seats four in comfort. Impressive direct injected 190PS 1.6-litre turbo drives well.
Bad: Small Boot. Small rear windows make back seats feel gloomy. CVT not very reliable. Standard 1.6 petrol noisy on motorway. 4WD dropped in 2014 revamp.
Good: The first sensible sized electric car at a sensible price. Ideal as a second car for short suburban runs or for use in the city.
Bad: Limited range of 100 miles means it cannot fully replace a diesel or hybrid family car.
Good: Low emissions and fuel consumption from 1.2-litre engine. Roomy and seats five. Decent value for money. Bluetooth as standard.
Bad: Lags behind most other small hatchbacks. Not as much hip and shoulder room as headroom. Interior feels cheap in places. Unexciting to drive. Air con not standard on Visia.
Good: Reliable and feels good quality. Car-like interior. Useful rear hinged rear doors on crew cab.
Bad: Ford Ranger is far superior.
Good: Practical design and spacious cabin. Reasonably comfortable. Clear instrument binnacle. Some clever technology on upper grades
Bad: Not very good to drive. Refinement isn't great. Material quality could be better.
Good: Wide range of conversions available including box van and recovery truck. Strong 2.5 dCi engine. Feels robust.
Bad: Cramped cabin feels dated. Engines are noisy.
Good: Good quality small van. Available as a useful seven seat MPV with reasonable luggage space. 1.5 litre dCi is economical. Rides much better than most vans.
Bad: Fairly utilitarian.
Good: Nissan's version of the Renault Master. Wide choice of versions and bodystyles. Long service intervals.
Bad: Interior quality not up to the standard of a Volkswagen Crafter.
Good: Rugged looks. Seven seats. Strong build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.
Bad: Adults will find the rearmost seats rather cramped. Vague manual gearshift.
Good: Refined and comfortable hatchback. Huge amounts of rear legroom. Quiet engines even at motorway speeds. Good equipment levels as standard.
Bad: Ordinary to drive. Drab interior. Doesn't especially stand out from the competition.
Good: One of the best 'crossovers'. 1.5 dCi emits just 99g/km. Improved interior over previous Qashqai. Very smooth and quiet ride.
Bad: Top versions very pricey. DAB reception is poor.
Good: Good quality, practical interior. Efficient diesel engine with plenty of torque. Much improved CVT automatic transmission. Comfortable ride.
Bad: Some interior details seem little cheap. Comfortable ride at expense of enjoyable handling. Rearmost row of seven seaters tight.
Used Cars
Cars not officially imported to the UK
Concept Cars

Reader Offers and Prizes

Buying Advice

Honest John's Newsletter

Connect with Honest John

Facebook YouTube