WIN: A mega bundle of Christmas prizes - worth more than £1000! Click here to enter | No thanks

Nissan Reviews

New Cars
Good: Great performance and wonderful engine. Seven-speed automatic transmission works well.
Bad: Visibility isn't good. Manual gearbox is clunky. Thirsty and expensive to run. Feeling dated.
Good: Great feelgood roadster. Looks and sounds great. V6 engine delivers muscular performance.
Bad: Firm ride on 19-inch wheels. High CO2 means expensive tax. Far from economical.
Good: Mindblowingly quick and astonishingly capable. Twin-turbo V6 develops 560PS. Good value compared to anything else as fast.
Bad: Automatic only. Not suited to traffic or driving in town. Tricky to park. Interior quality and finish are poor given the price.
Good: Radical looks turn heads. Appealing mix between a hatch and an SUV. Seats four in comfort. Impressive direct injected 190PS 1.6-litre turbo drives well.
Bad: Small Boot. Small rear windows make back seats feel gloomy. CVT not very reliable. Standard 1.6 petrol noisy on motorway. 4WD dropped in 2014 revamp.
Good: The first sensible sized electric car at a sensible price. Ideal as a second car for short suburban runs or for use in the city.
Bad: Limited range of 100 miles means it cannot fully replace a diesel or hybrid family car.
Good: Low emissions and fuel consumption from 1.2-litre engine. Roomy and seats five. Decent value for money. Bluetooth as standard.
Bad: Lags behind most other small hatchbacks. Not as much hip and shoulder room as headroom. Interior feels cheap in places. Unexciting to drive. Air con not standard on Visia.
Good: Reliable and feels good quality. Car-like interior. Useful rear hinged rear doors on crew cab.
Bad: Ford Ranger is far superior.
Good: Practical design and spacious cabin. Reasonably comfortable. Clear instrument binnacle. Some clever technology on upper grades
Bad: Not very good to drive. Refinement isn't great. Material quality could be better.
Good: Good quality small van. Available as a useful seven seat MPV with reasonable luggage space. 1.5 litre dCi is economical. Rides much better than most vans.
Bad: Fairly utilitarian.
Good: Nissan's version of the Renault Master. Wide choice of versions and bodystyles. Long service intervals.
Bad: Interior quality not up to the standard of a Volkswagen Crafter.
Good: Rugged looks. Seven seats. Rugged build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.
Bad: Adults will find the rearmost seats rather cramped. Vague manual gearshift.
Good: Refined and comfortable hatchback. Huge amounts of rear legroom. Quiet engines even at motorway speeds. Good equipment levels as standard.
Bad: Ordinary to drive. Drab interior. Doesn't especially stand out from the competition.
Good: One of the best 'crossovers'. 1.5 dCi emits just 99g/km, improved interior over previous Qashqai. Very smooth and quiet ride.
Bad: Top versions very pricey. No larger +2 version. More powerful engines delayed to 2015.
Good: Good quality, practical interior. Efficient diesel engine with plenty of torque. Much improved CVT automatic transmission. Comfortable ride.
Bad: Some interior details seem little cheap. Comfortable ride at expense of enjoyable handling. Rearmost row of seven seaters tight. More powerful engines delayed until 2015.
Used Cars
Cars not officially imported to the UK
Concept Cars

Reader Offers and Prizes

Buying Advice

Honest John's Newsletter

Connect with Honest John

Facebook YouTube