Quantcast

Jaguar Reviews

New Cars
Good: RWD from 129g/km CO2. 4WD 3.0 V6 diesel 700Nm and 5.7 second 0-60mph. AWD has full off road capability.
Bad: 129g/km only comes with 180PS 2.0 Ingenium diesel, RWD and manual.
Good: Stylish and highly desirable two-seater is smaller and cheaper than the XK. Impressive performance from all engines. Sounds superb.
Bad: Very little luggage space. Shallow 196 litre boot becomes almost useless if space saver spare is optioned.
Good: Breathtaking good looks and outstanding handling. R model is brutally quick. Cabin is classy and comfortable. Boot is also usable.
Bad: Expensive to run. Ride can be rather hard. Infotainment system feels dated.
Good: Strong alternative to the BMW 3 Series and Mercedes C-Class. Superb ride comfort and fuel economy. Eight-speed automatic is excellent.
Bad: Not a lot of room in the back. Boot is smaller than its rivals. Some of the interior plastics feel cheap.
Good: Superb blend of ride quality and enjoyable handling. Comfortable and refined. Well-equipped as standard. Available with low CO2 diesel engines.
Bad: Some of the best equipment is optional and expensive. Some materials aren't quite up to standards of an Audi A6.
Good: Good looking estate version of the XF. Gets self-levelling rear suspension as standard. As good to drive as the saloon. Usefully wide and square boot area.
Bad: 2.2-litre diesel has to be worked hard and doesn't have the performance you'd expect.
Good: A characterful alternative to the go-to German luxury saloons and far more engaging to drive. Diesel offers low emissions and tax but is very strong. Excellent overall refinement.
Bad: Not as much rear space as you might expect. Some inconsistency in cabin quality. Doesn’t always feel head and shoulders above the Jaguar XF.
Used Cars
Concept Cars
 

Buying Advice

Honest John's Newsletter

Connect with Honest John

Facebook YouTube