The OP doesn't have creakdown cover with the AA, they have a used car warranty with the AA. That's why they're complaining that the AA wouldn't cover those repairs that are mentioned - though I seem to recall the details on one of those repairs, and the OP didn't follow the warranty conditions at all (didn't make the old parts available for inspection).
Unfortunately, the Renault Laguna from that era is one of the most notorious cars for 'issues' - most notably with electrics. That's why they are so cheap on the secondhand market.
It was well known in the motor trade a few years ago that problems with those Lagunas could (and regularly would) wipe out any profit margin, and as such you'll find that very few places will offer more than a token amount in part-ex, unless you're buying something with a very nice profit margin, or you're buying something that the garage is desperate to get rid of.
I seem to recall the OP (in one of his previous complaints about his breakdown warranty) mentioning that he was taking this to the ombudsman. He was informed by the HJ forumites that, as he had not followed the conditions of the warranty, we didn't feel he had much chance, and that most people felt the AA's position was reasonable.
It was noticed that the result of the ombudsmans decision was never posted ... I wonder why ?
|