Mercedes-Benz Reviews
New Cars
Good: Much better execution of original A-Class concept, feels far higher quality, easy to park.
Bad: Not enjoyable to drive, smaller petrol engines are underpowered, some problems emerging, expensive compared to the competition, interior quality doesn't feel up to scratch.
Good: Raised driving position, lots of interior room, decent diesel engines, good ride quality on smaller wheels.
Bad: Not good enough for the money, steering feels too artificial, woeful automatic gearboxes, lacklustre petrol engines.
Good: Economical and practical second generation B-Class, interior quality promises to be improved.
Bad: Fidgety ride, still no looker.
Good: Feels well built and robust, very comfortable and refined, high quality ride, a big improvement on the previous C-Class, good CDI diesels.
Bad: Looks are heavy rather than svelte and graceful, interior isn't very inviting, steering is precise but lacks feel.
Good: Well built, attractively styled, available with low emission diesel engines, enjoyable to drive, entry-level C180 model is surprisingly good.
Bad: It's not as sporty as you might think, looks very similar to the saloon.
Good: Neatly styled estate, very comfortable and refined, impressive CDI diesels are economical, classy image, good sized useable boot space.
Bad: Parameter steering overlight in town, expensive options, not the best estate for driver enjoyment, still has an old-school foot operated parking brake.
Good: Beautiful looking coupe, Ferrari performance in comfort, high quality feel, a rare sight on the roads, AMG version is amazingly fast, more aggressive looking following 2010 facelift.
Bad: Expensive to buy and run, depreciates rapidly, very big for a two-door car.
Good: Big CO2 reductions, four-cylinder CLS 250 available at last, precisely-built interior, retains unique style of original CLS, features full LED headlights.
Bad: Rear headroom tight for taller passengers, options expensive
Good: Distinctive and sharp looks, excellent CDI diesels, good motorway cruiser, very comfortable and refined, feels very well built.
Bad: Steering could do with more feel, lacklustre petrol and automatic gearbox combination, interior not as inviting as other premium saloons.
Good: Elegant styling, little top-down turbulence, good selection of petrol and diesel engines, roof folds down (and up) on the move.
Bad: Not very exciting or involving to drive, awkward shaped boot,
cramped rear seats, springy manual gearchange, four-cylinder diesels
noisy with roof down.
Good: Classy and upmarket coupe, superb C350 CDI engine, decent headroom in the back, good-sized boot, supportive and comfortable seats.
Bad: Four-cylinder E250 CDI model is noisy and lacks refinement, old fashioned touches like foot-operated parking brake.
Good: Well built and sharp styling, huge and useful boot space, comfortable long distance car, excellent CDI diesels, very refined.
Bad: Doesn't deal with corners as well as other premium estates, disappointing smaller petrol engines.
Good: Huge road presence, very exclusive, hand built to exacting standards, bomb-proof reliability, unstoppable off road but with a luxury interior, AMG version is an absolute beast.
Bad: Only available through the Specialist Products Division at Mercedes-Benz World at Brooklands in Surrey, high list prices, not designed for corners.
Good: Supremely comfortable, genuine seven-seater, immensely competent on and off road, very refined and luxurious, GL420 CDI model is immense.
Bad: Sheer size means it's hard to manouevre and park, not great in corners, rear visibility is poor, GL500 is expensive to run.
Good: More spacious and more fuel efficient than the outgoing model.
Bad: Not on sale in the UK until 2012.
Good: Comfortable ride, tidy handling, excellent engines including 320 CDI, plenty of safety kit, upmarket interior.
Bad: Only has five seats, a BMW X5 is a sharper drive, expensive to buy new.
Good: Mercedes-Benz version of a people carrier, huge amounts of space inside, available as a long wheelbase for even more room, a seven seater from 2010 (rather than the original six-seater) and lower emission engines.
Bad: Feels big and cumbersome from behind the wheel, sheer size makes it tricky to manoeuvre, AMG version seems pointless.
Good: Wonderfully luxurious, high-class cabin, superb refinement on the move, the best looking limo this size, improved again from 2010.
Bad: Feels as big as it looks, sophisticated systems expensive to maintain and replace, costly servicing.
Good: Great performance from all the engines with SL350 the pick of the bunch, neat folding metal roof.
Bad: Expensive with top versions more than £100,000.
Good: More efficient and powerful engines, increased interior space.
Bad: Not on sale until July 2012.
Good: More aggressive look than previous SLK, neatly designed and high quality interior, three roof options, economical engines, available with 250 CDI engine.
Bad: Not as good to drive as the competition, optional automatic isn't quick or decisive enough, high list prices.
Good: Stunning looks complete with gullwing doors, amazing performance thanks to 6.2-litre V8 AMG engine, 0-62mph in just 3.8 seconds, excellent grip and handling, easy to drive.
Bad: From £157,500, but extras can soon add £20,000.
Good: Drives tidily for such a large vehicle, seats up to eight people, classy feel inside.
Bad: Van-based looks are unappealing, pricey, more of a minibus for corporate work than a versatile family MPV.
Used Cars
Cars not officially imported to the UK
Concept Cars

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Fiat Panda
BMW 1 Series
Vauxhall Astra


