Review: Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012)
Comfortable, safe and enjoyable. Good looks, backed up by a decent drive.
Distracting reflections from dashboard and instruments. Floating dash panel doesn't suit everyone. Expensive problems with diesel more than three years old.
Recently Added To This Review
Volvo S40 2.0D vehicle failed to start and and showed error message: TURN STEERING WHEEL and ATTEMPT RESTART. Owner thinks this is a sympton of a common ECU problem. Volvo dealer replaced steering... Read more
Report of 2011 Volvo S40 1.6 diesel needing new clutch, flywheel and injectors. Read more
in data survey of Warranty Direct policy warranty claims. (Excludes KIAs, Hyundais, Toyotas and others with 7, 5 and 4 year warranties.) Read more
Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012): At A Glance
It's not often I get to test a new car and it turns out to exceed all expectations. Okay, just about anything would have been better than the old Mitsubishi Carisma based S40. And the Mazda 3 had already given a foretaste of what to expect in the chassis department. If the new S40 had been just a little bit better than the Mazda 3 it would have been fine.
Instead, it's close to sensational.
The signs for this particular launch were not good. Our plane suffered a bird in the engine while landing to pick us up, so we had to wait hours for a replacement plane. Then, on the main drive in Andalusia, it rained gatos y peros. And, even though we were in Spain, there was a shortage of Manuels, so we had no choice but to drive automatics. The rain didn't stop all day. So, sorry folks, apart from the headlight and the key picture I've had to use stock shots.
But the conditions were actually a better test of the car than bright sunlight and bone-dry roads. And both the 170bhp 2.4i and 220bhp T5 automatics behaved impeccably.
What does a Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012) cost?Get a finance quote with CarMoney
Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012): What's It Like Inside?
- Boot space is 325–883 litres
The seats are very comfortable; all five of them, though, like the S60, the centre rear is really only for children. The driving position is multi adjustable for all sizes of driver and there is plenty of headroom for those of higher altitude. The neat central instrument panel has no back, so there is space behind it, as in a MINI, which should make behind the fascia components such as the heater matrix more accessible for maintenance. The boot is deep, wide and square shaped, like the suitcases it will have to accommodate. And, of course, the back seats fold down.
I'd better mention a few features we hardly noticed. The key is entirely electronic. The Interior Air Quality System (climate control) did such a good job we never touched any of the buttons. Satnav and integrated phone systems are available. Side windows are laminated against intruders. The driver information system is anti-distraction so, for example, the phone won't take a call if the IDIS registers you are driving the car really hard.
But these are details. The two main reasons for buying the car are the way it looks and the way it goes. And it's terrific in both respects.
Child seats that fit a Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012)Our unique Car Seat Chooser shows you which child car seats will fit this car and which seat positions that they will fit, so that you don't have to check every car seat manufacturer's website for compatibility.
What's the Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012) like to drive?
The box is a five speeder with my pet bugbear of back-to-front Tiptronic style manual override and no steering wheel gearchange buttons. But they are my only complaints about the entire car. The programmable electro hydraulic steering was superbly weighted and accurate, making the car feel as well planted on the road as it actually was at all times. Even though some corners were covered in half an inch of water, I never unstuck it once, and never even felt the DSTC cut in. That's extremely impressive, because though most of the time we were driving at moderate speeds, sometimes we were way over 100 and saw 130 on one occasion. It's much nicer and much more confident than a front drive Audi A4, and most drivers will probably prefer it even to a BMW 3-Series or Mercedes C Class.
These are the cars it's very seriously up against. At last there's a viable ‘premium compact' alternative to the A4, 3-Series and C Class. The new Honda Accord shouldn't be forgotten here either, but it's a bigger less ‘sexy' sort of car. The new S40 will sell on looks to rival the A4 and handling to rival the 3-Series.
That's enough enthusiastic flannel. I'd better tell you a bit more about what you get for your money and the alternative engine packages.
January 2005 saw a 1.6 petrol model and a Ford/PSA 1.6 16v diesel, selling for around £15,000. 1.8 petrol models, with Ford rather than Mitsubishi engines, arrive in May 2004, from around £15,500 or maybe £16,000 (prices are not yet confirmed). But from January 2004 you'll be able to buy 2.4 5-cylinder petrol models with 170bhp, T5s with 220bhp and a 136bhp 2.0 litre diesel (the new Fods/PSA engine as first seen in the C-Max). The old S40 with 1.6 or 1.8 Mitsubishi engines, 2.0 four cylinder Volvo engines or 1.9 litre Renault based diesel engines will soldier on in production at Born, Holland until June 200 and will be distinguished in the time honoured way by being called the S40 ‘Classic'.
The new car is incredibly crash safe, as Volvo proved by T-boning an SC90 into the side of it. The doors sacrifice storage for strengthening. It has a clever new design of deformable front with collapsible buffers and a massively strong bulkhead to prevent the engine being pushed back into the passenger compartment. The floorpan and bodyshell are build from five different tensiles of steel for extra strength and make the car 68% more resistant to twisting than the old model. This stiffness in turn ensures the suspension and tyres work properly. And allow suspension settings that give good ride quality as well as excellent handling and road-holding.
|1.6||39–40 mpg||11.9 s||169–171 g/km|
|1.6 D||58 mpg||11.4–12.0 s||129 g/km|
|1.6D DRIVe||63 mpg||11.4 s||119 g/km|
|1.6D DRIVe Start/Stop||72–74 mpg||11.4 s||99–104 g/km|
|1.8||39–39 mpg||10.9 s||172–174 g/km|
|1.8 FlexiFuel||38 mpg||10.9 s||177 g/km|
|2.0||37–38 mpg||9.5 s||176–177 g/km|
|2.0 D||49 mpg||9.5 s||153 g/km|
|2.4i||33 mpg||7.7–8.2 s||203 g/km|
|D2||66 mpg||11.4 s||114 g/km|
|D3||50–55 mpg||9.5–9.6 s||134–149 g/km|
|D3 Geartronic||50 mpg||9.6 s||149 g/km|
|D4||50–55 mpg||8.7–8.8 s||134–149 g/km|
|D4 Geartronic||50 mpg||8.8 s||149 g/km|
|D5||46 mpg||7.9 s||164 g/km|
|T5||33 mpg||6.8 s||203–208 g/km|
|T5 Geartronic||31 mpg||7.2 s||211 g/km|
Real MPG average for a Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012)
Real MPG was created following thousands of readers telling us that their cars could not match the official figures.
Real MPG gives real world data from drivers like you to show how much fuel a vehicle really uses.
Diesel or petrol? If you're unsure whether to go for a petrol or diesel (or even an electric model if it's available), then you need our Petrol or Diesel? calculator. It does the maths on petrols, diesels and electric cars to show which is best suited to you.
What have we been asked about the Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012)?
Every day we're asked hundreds of questions from car buyers and owners through Ask Honest John. Our team of experts, including the nation's favourite motoring agony uncle - Honest John himself - answer queries and conudrums ranging from what car to buy to how to care for it as an owner. If you could do with a spot of friendly advice before buying you're next car, get in touch and we'll do what we can to help.
I'm only getting 26mpg on my Volvo S40 - what should I be getting?
What Cars Are Similar To The Volvo S40 (2004 – 2012)?
Unclear on what your next car should be? Use our Car Chooser to pick something that suits your needs.
What do owners think?
Our view gives your our opinion, based on driving hundreds of cars every year, but you can't beat the views of someone who lives with a car day-in, day out.
- 5 star
- 4 star 50%
- 3 star 50%
- 2 star
- 1 star