Skoda Citigo (2012 - 2019)
reviewed by Anonymous on 4 April 2024
reviewed by robert caddick on 30 November 2020
reviewed by Anonymous on 12 February 2019
reviewed by Anonymous on 27 September 2018
reviewed by Anonymous on 9 August 2018
reviewed by cassandra tingey on 1 July 2018
reviewed by Anonymous on 30 April 2018
reviewed by Anonymous on 24 February 2018
reviewed by bryan riddell on 29 December 2016
reviewed by Phil2961 on 26 October 2015
reviewed by Bedhead on 4 September 2015
reviewed by Shugs on 6 April 2015
reviewed by Philately on 22 October 2014
reviewed by Tim Hale on 31 August 2014
reviewed by Huw Jenjin on 28 August 2014
reviewed by Anonymous on 28 August 2014
reviewed by Doctp on 13 February 2014
reviewed by davidoily on 28 November 2013
reviewed by mike of farnborough on 14 October 2013
reviewed by deeply disappointed of devon on 26 August 2013
reviewed by CB.123 on 20 July 2013
reviewed by Peter James on 4 May 2013
reviewed by Festina Lente on 18 November 2012
.jpg?width=420&height=250&rmode=crop)
S 5 door
reviewed by LST524 on 21 October 2012
3
Overall rating
2
How it drives
5
Fuel economy
2
Tax/Insurance/Warranty costs
3
Cost of maintenance and repairs
4
Experience at the dealership
4
How practical it is
4
How you rate the manufacturer
4
Overall reliability
A noisy little car that is very functional, but has no soul
Bought this to replace a Fiat Panda that I had since 2005 with no problems. Its function is to give transport to 3 teenage/twentysomething children, so it gets well used. The Skoda has now done 3500 miles. It is bigger inside and slightly quicker, but it is so much less fun. The engine/drivetrain is very noisy, the handling is adequate at best, it is just far less nimble than the Panda. Ventilation is poor, the windscreen washer jets are poor. Overall a bit disappointed. It does its job but whereas I used to fight past the Mercedes and Subaru to drive the Panda, the kids can have this one.
Write your review
About this car
| Price | £8,275–£11,885 |
|---|---|
| Road Tax | A–B |
| MPG | 58.9–68.9 mpg |
| Real MPG | 87.0% |
.jpg)
