I clearly understand the purpose of speed bumps and cushions and the like. What seems to be badly thought out is that if you are driving along a road, with a posted speed limit of 20 mph say, you should be able to proceed at that speed without ripping the sump off your car and otherwise damaging it. Why should traffic driving at the given limit be further slowed down? Post a lower sepeed limit and leave the surface alone!
|
Spotted an article in the mail this morning that Barnet Coucil are getting rid of all their humps.
Spokesman for Transport 2000 becomes hysterical as usual and predicts hundreds more road deaths if this done across the country. Don't these people live in the real world?
Rant still simmering.
|
Trouble is Alfa these hysterical rants are a one way street for them. By saying it they set fear in peoples minds. If nothing happens then it all goes quiet, I have never seen a paper go back and review and report, you said this would happen and it has not so you were wrong weren't you?
If there are more accidents, even though they may be unrelated to the removal of the humps, they can jump up and say, see we told you its all your fault.
Still to be fair most left wing politics operates on this principle.
|
|
|
I believe in Liverpool they are having to alter most speed humps as they are so acute they are damaging the underneath of limo's and funeral cars bieng rather longer than the average cars are getting stuck on them
|
On second thoughts perhaps this should be in the motoring jokes section
|
|
|
|