Real MPG: Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.
Small boot limits practicality, interior feels cheap, lacks the refinement of modern rivals.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 1.2 | 56.5 mpg | - | 50.6 mpg | 89% | |
| 1.2 4X4 | 51.3 mpg | - | 44.2 mpg | 86% | |
| 1.2 Automatic | 50.4 mpg | - | 43.8 mpg | 87% | |
| 1.2 Dualjet | 65.7 mpg | - | 53.9 mpg | 82% | |
| 1.2 Dualjet 4x4 | 51.3–58.8 mpg | - | 48.2 mpg | 88% | |
| 1.3 DDiS | 67.3–72.4 mpg | - | 61.1 mpg | 88% | |
| 1.6 Sport | 44.1 mpg | - | 41.0 mpg | 93% | |
| Sport | 44.1 mpg | - | 42.3 mpg | 96% |
Read the Honest John review...
.jpg?width=310&height=175&rmode=crop)
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.
Rivals
| Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017) | 48.6 | avg mpg |
| Citroen C4 (2011 - 2018) | 54.2 | avg mpg |
| Volkswagen Polo (2009 - 2017) | 50.2 | avg mpg |
| Ford Focus (2011 - 2014) | 45.7 | avg mpg |
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
