Part ex rip-offs - Miller
Has anyone part-exd their car to a dealer only to find it up for sale at an inflated price on the dealer's forecourt a few days later?
Part ex rip-offs - Andrew-T
Many have, I should think. Dealer has to make profit somewhere, and pay for a warranty and some servicing. Best not to go back and check the forecourt. But remember that he isn't likely to get the full price he is asking, especially for a 'cash sale'.
Part ex rip-offs - spikeyhead {p}
You could always sell it yourself instead. Just remember to include a six month warranty, give it a full valet
pay for all the adverts
and keep it until its sold
offer a discount on it when its sold and buy whatever he's trading in.

or just accept the fact that dealers put up with it for the profit. Put up with calls at 10pm on Xmas day asking about service hiostories, yes it does happen.
--
I read often, only post occasionally
Part ex rip-offs - dylan
I really don't understand forecourt prices. My local Toyota dealer is particularly bad. For example, they currently have a September 2003 celica 1.8 (base model, no extras, matt paint), 20000 miles, for £15495.

This car lists at £16654, and drivethedeal are selling them brand new for £15051.

Now I've known people to pay silly money to dealers for used cars - it's amazing how many people will just stump up the asking price without really thinking it through. But in this case, seriously, who is going to pay £15495 for a year-old car when a brand new one lists at £16654? Even if you forget about drivethedeal (some people might not know it exists), it makes no sense that anyone would consider this deal.

No doubt some will say 'ah, but they have to leave room for haggling'. What a load of old nonsense, though. What kind of business advertises prices *above* what they actually intend to charge? It's bonkers.

Part ex rip-offs - mark999
Sold a Primera to a dealer for £2700 It was advertsed the next week for £3995. Even if buyer knocked them down and they spent a
bit making it ready for sale Its a fair profit.
Part ex rip-offs - cheddar
Father-in-law sold a Mondeo ('96) to a dealer for £1000, they put it on the forecourt for £2495.
Part ex rip-offs - jdc
Can't believe this thread.

Dealer makes profit - shock, horror !

Sell the car yourself then. You can't have it all ways.

I get totally fed up with this "we are being ripped off' mentality - people have to make money, companies have to make profits - deal with it !

Part ex rip-offs - adverse camber
In some cases, and im thinking of the toyota above, dealers hold cars for a while with silly prices for the benefit of new car buyers, they see a year old car on the frecourt and think , hey! great depreciation. It will be shoved out to auction or something later.

imho

Mark
Part ex rip-offs - machika
I called in at the local Citroen main dealer in Derby earlier this year and they had a 03/53 C5 1.8i LX for about £9500. I asked for a test drive, as I had never been out in a 1.8i. The salesman was obviously keen to tell me what a wonderful bargain it was, saving so much on the price of a new one. They seem to think that nobody bothers to check up on the real world new prices of cars and I wonder if they do themselves. I pointed out to him that a brand new model could be had from drivethedeal.com, for not much more, but it didn't result in much comment from him.
Part ex rip-offs - Adam {P}
I'm not complaining....well - I suppose I am really but we sold a 24v 2.5 Mondeo years ago - or rather part ex'd it. For 5 grand. There was a motorbike dealer next door so when my Dad bought a new bike a few weeks later he saw, much to his surprise that it was up for 8,900. Being fair though, they had tarted it up and they need to make a profit I suppose.
--
Adam
Part ex rip-offs - dylan
I get totally fed up with this "we are being ripped
off' mentality - people have to make money, companies have
to make profits - deal with it !


Yeah, but the odd thing is that UK companies (or international companies operating in the UK) seem to be able to make more money here than other places. That's what's odd. I don't see it so much as companies 'ripping us off', but rather British people being prepared to pay too much for things.

One simple example - I was in Australia recently and noticed that metallic paint is $200 extra on most cars (around £80). So why do we pay £300 here? That differential can't be explained by tax differences etc. It shows that the underlying cost of metallic paint is not related to price, and that the companies are simply charging as much as the market will stand. Of course this is totally natural. If I was selling something I'd try to sell it for the maximum price. But the point is - why are British people prepared to pay £300 for metallic? (As an aside, I'm not, which is why I'll be driving red cars for the foreseeable future :-))

Normally what we'd expect to happen is that market forces would eliminate this practice - a new car company would come along and try to compete by offering cheaper metallic paint. But that doesn't seem to happen with the UK car market. I guess new players come along and see 'wow, these mugs will pay £300 for metallic paint - no way I'm rocking the boat', or whatever the equivalent is in Korean.

So next time anyone complains about 'rip-off culture', ask yourself if you aren't contributing to it by being prepared to pay inflated prices for things you don't need.

Part ex rip-offs - No Do$h
I've a growing pile of car brochures next to my hi-fi chair* and have noticed that most manufacturers seem to offer two or three solid colours, usually plain awful, and a minimum of 8 metallics. The solid blue in the Touareg brochure is just nasty. And when did it become compulsory to only offer metallic and not solid black? All part of getting profit back into the UK retail motor industry as few if any fleets pay for metallic these days.

* The one that you can't get a decent view of the TV from but the stereo imaging from my hi-fi is spot on :o)
Part ex rip-offs - NowWheels
I was in Australia recently and noticed that metallic paint is
$200 extra on most cars (around £80). So why do we pay £300 here?


It's the same phenomenon as the The Great British Automatic gearbox ripoff. The price of an upgrade to auto is usually about £1000 extra here, but euro1,000 elsewhere in Europe, or $1000 in the USA -- that's about £600 elsewhere.

Even in Ireland, which is usually a rip-of, auto gearboxes are sold at the European price rather than the British one .. so it's nothing to do with LHD/RHD conversion costs.
Part ex rip-offs - Aprilia
I have posted on here before about stupid prices in the UK.

To be fair, things have got better in the last few years. When my father and I were in the car business the guys at the 'top end' (i.e. Franchisees) were making a LOT of money. A friend of my father managed to get the local SAAB franchise in the early-mid 1980's - within five years he had made quite literally
millions. It was amazing to see him just roll the cash in. All the dealers were operating as a cartel with protected territories etc etc. I think those days are pretty much gone - largely due to the intervention of the EU, the Consumers' Association and not least in recent years, the Internet.

At the moment I am managing to make a little money 'on the side' by importing some automotive-related goods from the US and selling them on Ebay. Even with carriage, import tax and Ebay fees, I can still make about 30% without much effort.
On a similiar vein, I have noted how much cheaper general parts are in the US - or indeed parts are available there that are not available here. MB blower motor brushes tend to wear out. UK dealers do not supply them - you have to buy a complete motor at £250+ (last time I checked), however I can buy brushes from the US for about £20 delivered and have repaired a few motors this way.
My friend who runs an autotransmission rebuilding business imports a lot of his parts from an agent in Florida - the price differences are absolutely staggering (a factor of 10 for some parts!).

Similarly Nissan parts are far cheaper in the US. Gazza posted recently wanting a CDL remote control for his Nissan. I think they are about £127+VAT in the UK. Courtesy Nissan in Texas sell the same factory part for about $80 + about $10 delivery to the UK. The same difference applies to most other parts. I guess UK dealers could buy their stock at retail price from the US, pay duty, and STILL make a healthy profit!
Part ex rip-offs - Hugo {P}
It's a free market. Put your energies into getting the best deal possible and go from there.

Mentioning my recent purchase of a van again, I was stagard at the price differences. The van was priced up at £14995 +vat. The dealer said he could do it for £12700+vat. After having done some research I managed to negotiate the price down to £10900+ vat. I see there are some low mileage 2nd hand ones on e bay for more that that!

So, whether its parts, cars etc shop around!

Aprilla, do you have any good web site addresses for the US suppliers you mention? If you do, please post them here.

Thanks

Hugo
Part ex rip-offs - Altea Ego
Oh come on! anyone who cant negotiate free metalic paint on their new car does not deserve to be in charge of a wallet.!

Part ex rip-offs - dylan
Oh come on! anyone who cant negotiate free metalic paint on
their new car does not deserve to be in charge of
a wallet.!


Well, drivethedeal will only discount metallic paint by around 10% from what I've seen (e.g. on a yaris it's £270 rather than £300).

So I'd guess your 'free' metallic paint that you negotiate is really just eating into the discount you would otherwise get. In other words, you can get 'free' metallic paint but still be paying £300 more than you would for a flat colour. If you can give me an example where you've been quoted the same discounted price regardless of flat or metallic, I'd find your argument more convincing.

Part ex rip-offs - Pugugly {P}
Free Market Economy.
Part ex rip-offs - Aprilia
Free Market Economy.


LOL!

Are there people around who really believe this!

After being in the motor business for a couple of decades I can tell you that there is nothing 'free' about the retail motor industry. 'Vertical control' from top to bottom is what the manufacturers want (witness the way so many, like Mercedes, want to run the whole show from factory to customer). A free market is the last thing they want! The EU is pushing at them through things like the ending of Block Exemption - trouble is they have so many paid 'lobbyists' (that's putting it politely) in government that progress is slow.
Part ex rip-offs - cheddar
Can't believe this thread.
Dealer makes profit - shock, horror !
Sell the car yourself then. You can't have it
all ways.
I get totally fed up with this "we are being ripped
off' mentality - people have to make money, companies have
to make profits - deal with it !



Must say, I agree.
Part ex rip-offs - Retro
No-one forces you to sell your car to a dealer.

If he offers you a price, check it and if you are not happy sell it yourself. Also, check "the price to change".

Once you have done the deal, in my opinion you should enter a whinge free zone about what the dealer makes out of your old car.
Part ex rip-offs - Robin Reliant
Agreed. Once you've been in business yourself you realise that only a very small proportion of the difference between what you buy for and what you sell for is profit. There are so many other claims to settle first.
Part ex rip-offs - blue_haddock
I run a brokerage department for a toyota dealer, as we give full discount at the front end we can only give what a trade in is actually worth, which is usualy lower than what most people expect.

What i say to cusomters is try to sell your car privately whilst waiting for your new one knowing that you have the fall back plan of my part ex if you don't manage to sell it.

On some of the toyota range the black is a solid colour, what i don't like is on things like citroens where despite it being a solid colour they charge you extra to have black paint.
Part ex rip-offs - Martin Devon
I am in the Building Trade and not cars, but customers are customers the world over and none of them are forced to do anything they don't want to do. I just wish they would stop whingeing about someone else making a quid. Most that whinge are employed by someone else and don't really have a clue regarding market forces. If I ever get a customer who starts getting twitchy over cost I simply explain the following. ("Do you think (Supermarket/Butcher/etc) pay the same price for the Chicken that they are selling it for?") usually it works.

Happy Easter.
Part ex rip-offs - Dalglish
out of his so-called "profit", in addition to servicing/valet/warranty/legal-obligations, the dealer has to pay for:

rates, rent, cleaners, heating, lighting, maintenance of the buildings, insurance for his premises, public liability insurance; plus tax, vat, lawyers/accountants fees; wages for staff/salespeople; and risk keeping the car unsold for weeks and then send it off to auction to be sold at a loss.

hands up, now who would like to be dealer ? if it is so, so, easy to make a risk free killing - isn't it?

Part ex rip-offs - blue_haddock
also don't forget we need to pay for 4 holidays per year to exotic locations!
Part ex rip-offs - spikeyhead {p}
also don't forget we need to pay for 4 holidays per
year to exotic locations!


Since when has Peuoto Banuz been considered exotic?
--
I read often, only post occasionally
Part ex rip-offs - blue_haddock
Ok i'll admit Puerto Banus isn't exotic but it's only used for mid-winter golfing breaks.

Dubai and Thailand are current favourites in the trade
Part ex rip-offs - spikeyhead {p}
Ok i'll admit Puerto Banus isn't exotic but it's only used
for mid-winter golfing breaks.
Dubai and Thailand are current favourites in the trade


I obviously go on holiday with low class car dealers
--
I read often, only post occasionally
Part ex rip-offs - patently
out of his so-called "profit", in addition to
servicing/valet/warranty/legal-obligations, the dealer has to
pay for:


And don't forget that everything else has first call on the cash. Usually, the owner of the business is the last one to see the money - if there is any left over.
Part ex rip-offs - PhilW
Aah! Poor, poor dealers! I am almost feeling sorry for them - and I will switch from my independent to the main dealer immediately. They must be desperate for money to charge so much for labour and parts - barely manage to scrape a living I should think.
Ban independents, ban brokers, ban car supermarkets - they are impoverishing our dealers!!
(Sorry Mark -forgot the word "ban" is banned)
Part ex rip-offs - patently
If you want to. It's* a free country.




-------------------
(the 's' is an abbreviation of 'was', btw.
Part ex rip-offs - NowWheels
If you want to. It's* a free country.
(the 's' is an abbreviation of 'was', btw.


Damn Romans messed it all up, didn't they?
Part ex rip-offs - blue_haddock
Please don't ban brokers as without them i'm without a job!
Part ex rip-offs - Dalglish
>>out of his so-called "profit", .... the dealer has to pay for:
>>

and i forgot to include -

employers national-insurance contributions,
sick leave pay
holiday pay
maternity leave/pay
temporary staff to cover sickness/holidays/maternity

aprilia does not think we live in a free market economy. of course he is right. we live in a socialist state where all prices are dictated by the state and what you can/cannot buy is decided by them. everyone who has reached a sufficiently high equality status, and has therefor earned the right to own a car, drives trabants/ladas.

Part ex rip-offs - Aprilia
aprilia does not think we live in a free market economy.
of course he is right. we live in a socialist state
where all prices are dictated by the state and what you
can/cannot buy is decided by them. everyone who has reached a
sufficiently high equality status, and has therefor earned the right to
own a car, drives trabants/ladas.


Anyone who thinks we live in a 'free market economy' has never run their own business and has not progressed beyond schoolboy GCSE economics. Are people really so naive? 'Free Market Economics' is little more than an ideological chant.

Go over and take a look at the US (the home of the 'Free Market') and you will find that the state intervenes on a massive scale. In the US the price of many car parts is government controlled; the government insists on a mandatory 8-year warranty on emissions-related components; the government insists that all vehicle service information is available to anybody who wants it (and at 'reasonable cost'); the government bans the fixed pricing of spare parts (you will find different dealers charge different prices for the same part).

In the UK the manufacturers have become monopoly suppliers of service information and parts.

Some years ago my father and I got quite a good local reputation for fixing MB's at reasonable prices. Obviously we had to purchase many parts from a local dealer. We got too good at our job. One day we were told our account had been closed (it was not in arrears). Then when we rang to order parts (they always asked 'who's calling') we were told the 'computer was down'. Then one of the parts guys we were friendly with told us that the managers had said we would no longer be supplied.

We then started to use another dealer about 30 miles away. After a while they were 'got at' and stopped supplying us too.
We had to order from a dealer many miles away and pay for courier delivery! Bigger items we got from Speedautoteile in Germany.
This sort of thing goes on all the time (or it did - things may be changing). The last thing these companies want is competition and a 'free market'.

I find it very odd that British people think we have a 'free market'. We have multiple supplies of energy, telecommunications etc etc and yet all of these industries have a 'regulator' (OFFCOM, OFWAT, OFFER etc etc). The job of the regulator is to tell all of these competing companies how much they can charge, how much profit they can make etc. etc.
Then we have the DTI and Competition Commission to investigate supermarkets, fine Argos for 'price fixing', fine Volvo for running a dealer cartel (all been through court and in the public domain, BTW) - not to mention the cement cartel that has been running for decades. The tip of the iceburg, I suspect.
Doesn't sound too 'free' to me.....
Part ex rip-offs - patently
Aprilia,

No-one is brave enough to allow a perfect free market. No politician would dare, because some people would lose out.

And quite rightly, becuase some of those who lost out would be literally penniless and would starve. So the argument moved on to "how much intervention is required", and we forgot that the interventions were the exceptions not the norm.
Part ex rip-offs - Dalglish
Anyone who thinks we live in a 'free market economy' has
never run their own business and has not progressed beyond
schoolboy GCSE economics ...

>>

hypothesis:
"communism = totally free market"
"capitalism = controlled anti-competitive/anti-monopoly market"


if your schoolboy had been to a private school (rather than a communist/socialist school), he would have been taught Thatcher's economics; and learnt that in a true free market, the real business owner ultimate aim is to become a dominant or sole (i.e. monopoly ) supplier and to wipe out your competition. that is unless he is not a real businessman and instead he is a philanthropist or charity worker.

in a true free market, the tendency is towards a communist type monopoly owned market. the reason all kinds of monopoly and competition commissions exist is to stop real competetion ending up in winner takes all.

why do you think you are not allowed to link to "the times" on this site?

Part ex rip-offs - patently
in a true free market, the real business owner
ultimate aim is to become a dominant or sole (i.e. monopoly
) supplier and to wipe out your competition.


Of course. And all you need is two of them, plus a functioning law of competition and an effective and accessible courts system.

Any idea when the UK might be blessed with these? Prices of cars, servicing and all other goods & services might then settle to a fair level in a transparent manner.
Part ex rip-offs - Aprilia
in a true free market, the tendency is towards a communist
type monopoly owned market. the reason all kinds of monopoly and
competition commissions exist is to stop real competetion ending up in
winner takes all.


Totally agree. I was trying counter the characters who chant 'Free Market' whenever anyone complains about being ripped off in the UK. They don't know what a true free market is. On a scale of 1-10 (10 = true Free Market) the US only scores about a '5' and we are probably lower than that.
New car prices have come down a lot in recent years and are now more or less on a par with the rest of Europe. It wasn't the free market that did it for us, it wasn't our politicians (of any party), it wasn't even our motoring journals. IIRC it was the Consumers' Association and the much-derided EU who harassed and shamed the manufacturers into giving us a better deal and amde it easier for us to import from Europe.
Part ex rip-offs - Civic8
>>Has anyone part-exd their car to a dealer only to find it up for sale at an inflated price on the dealer's forecourt a few days later?

Many a time..I dont have a problem with that..Dont see why anyone would. You sold it to dealer its his motor..what he does with it after that is his business not anyone elses..If price marked up is too high it wont sell anyway.

--
Steve
Part ex rip-offs - expat
I part exchanged my Nissan a few years ago. The dealer had another buyer waiting for it and it didn't even get into the car yard. I expect he doubled the price. The reason I didn't sell it privately was that, in my opinion, the car was due for big bills and I felt bad about trying to persuade a buyer it was a good car when I thought that it wasn't. It didn't worry me to sell it to the dealer. He is a professional mechanic and he could form his own opinion of what it was worth with much more experience and knowledge than I had. I didn't tell him anything about it. Just showed him the service history and gave him the keys to do his own appraisal.

I was talking to the dealer a few months later and he told me that it had cost them big money on the warranty. ECU went, fuel injection went, exhaust, etc. I used to feel embarrassed when I saw the new owner with it but he had made no attempt to contact me before buying it despite my name and address being all over the rego papers and owners handbook. I would have told him the truth had he asked.

I believe that most people who sell a car which is more than about 5 years old are selling because they are expecting big bills. If you are thinking of buying a car from a dealer try to find out who owned it before and ring him up. He will most likely give you an honest opinion. He has got nothing to lose.
Part ex rip-offs - Stuartli
>>If you are thinking of buying a car from a dealer try to find out who owned it before and ring him up. He will most likely give you an honest opinion. He has got nothing to lose.>>

In 40 years of buying used cars for personal use I've never yet come across a dealer who wasn't willing to provide the name and contact details for a vehicle's previous owner.

In turn, the previous vehicle owner normally provided a fair appraisal of the car (in many cases exactly what the part exchange value had been as well, although this is not always relevant) and I could then form a buying decision with an open mind.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
What\'s for you won\'t pass you by