An increasing number of buyers are realising that wide tyres and bling wheels may be fashionable but the ride is much better on thinner taller tyres and much less chance of kerbing the rim.
Just a shame that the car manufacturers and some insurers are (in the main) completely ignoring them (including myself) and insisting on mid and upper range models (in terms of trim level, not necessarily engine size/performance) on having only slow or ultra-low profile tyres on large rims.
Th cynic in me thinks there is a stitch-up between the car and tyre manufacturers (as low profile tyres cost vastly more and last a lot less), with insurers (and possibly health professionals) turning a blind eye to the car manufacturers saying no higher profile tyres are offered (even if the brakes aren't upgraded so that smaller wheels don't fit over them), as they get extra fees from higher insurance premiums, and more visits to the chiroprator, osteopath, etc, due to higher instances of back complaints because of the firm ride in cars on our poor roads.
Firms/service providers that don't listen to the client base eventually come acropper. You would've thought with all that's been happening in the news on this sort of thing, including (the equivalent in) politicians now 'reaping the whirlwind' in not listening and taking heed of voters' concerns, that car firms would have started to wake up to this. Apparently not.
I'm voting with my feet and holding off buying until more sensible (cost free or even reductions in prices) options are given for those of us who may want a bit of luxury in a car, but don't want (or need) it to resemble the startship Enterprise in its electronic gimzos installed and Flintstonemobile in its wheel/tyre choice and ride comfort (I'd hire a car at the track or buy a [say] Caterham 7 if I wanted a track-day car), the only other choice to get the better riding tyres is to buy low spec trim and slow cars.
|