I was at a Renault dealership the other week and on exiting I picked up a few brochures to take home for my young son to have a look at the pictures.
The brochures included ones for the Dacia Logan and the Renault Megane SportTourer. When I got home I was perusing them myself and they contain quite a lot of tech specs and dimensions for brochures nowadays. I noted that the Megane's boot was only fractionally bigger than the Logan's -an inch or two in just one of the dimensions perhaps.
And when considering the two cars with the same 1.5 diesel engine -ok maybe the Megane had 100BHP against the Logan's 90 - the Logan was something like £10700 and the list price of the Megane was over £17000.
The Logan is even 99g/km for CO2, so it's not an old-tech uneconomical vehicle.
You can even extend the warranty up to 5 years for a one-off payment of, what was it, £800?, £500? A facility which I'm not sure was even available on the Renault. ( ? )
People primarily buy an estate car because they recognise they have a requirement for the boot space. On that basis, here seems an opportunity to buy effectively the same vehicle, even down to having the same engine, for massively less outlay.
Apart from having a different (and probably less practical, boot-roofline-wise) body shape, the Megane purely seemed to offer just extra trinkets; few of which you would truly miss in real day-to-day life.
I've long, long wondered why someone wouldn't sell a car in the UK that was something like a Suzuki Alto or Kia Picanto but with an estate boot on the back-end: The existing tiny boots on those cars are the main thing that prevent them being practical as a cheap-and-perfectly-adequate only-car for a couple with 2 pre-teen children. I'm glad that Dacia has done pretty-much that, but as it turns out, produced something which appears to be at least as accomodating as an Astra estate, never mind a Clio estate. Great!
|