Should I have been told that my Honda Jazz was originally a hire car?
I recently bought a Honda Jazz, twelve months old with 12,700 miles, from a reputable Honda dealer. I was told by the salesman that the car had one previous owner. It was not until I received the new registration certificate from the DVLA that I discovered the previous owner had been a car hire company. Does this constitute the dealership and the salesman being sparing with the truth?
Asked on 21 December 2013 by IK, Liverpool
Answered by
Honest John
No. If you buy a used car that is 3 - 18 months old then there is a 90 per cent probability that the first keeper of the car was a car rental company.
Tags:
hire cars
buying a used car
We give you the low down on how to save on insurance, little-known tricks and tips, what insurance groups mean and how to use insurance aggregators to beat insurers.
Insurance group finder and how to save on insuranceSimilar questions
I bought a six month old Volvo XC60 from my local Volvo dealer in Sunderland on the understanding that it was an ex Volvo UK management car. Two weeks later when I received the V5C in the post I noticed...
We have an apartment in Mallorca, Spain and currently rent cars. This works well, as we have found a decent private operator, but are looking for a slightly better standard of car as we increase our use...
On 23 November, I bought a 61-plate (registered Feb 2012) Volkswagen Golf 1.2 TSI 85 S five-door for £9629 from a dealer. The salesman told my wife and I that the car was previously registered to Volkswagen,...
Related models
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Neatly styled. Increased room and better performance than original Jazz. better to drive. Very versatile. CVT-7 returned in February 2011 replacing i-SHIFT. More reliable than first generation Jazz.
.jpg)
