Why did you recommend the Skoda Yeti which has a gearbox problem?
Why do you write so positively about VAG cars in your road tests? I’ve just read the Skoda Yeti test. You mention the 2.0 TDi. Quote from a Volkswagen main dealer: "it's the worst engine we've made", based on the level of warranty repairs. The gearbox issue is significant; it was designed for earlier, lower powered engines and arguably can't cope adequately with modern engines, especially those with higher torque ratings (like diesels). You can now buy aftermarket modified boxes that have had the rivets replaced with SS bolts. Maybe it's time VAG did something about it? In the meanwhile, would you buy one?
Asked on 5 December 2012 by DM. via email
Answered by
Honest John
A road test is almost always positive because it’s almost always of a brand new car. If you want the dirt, check a car-by-car breakdown that compiles the information from owners and drivers over the years. I never recommended the Yeti 2.0TDI. I didn't even test it. However, the transmission is protected by a dual mass flywheel. I admit, I did recommend the Yeti 1.8TSI 4WD. Check the car-by-car entries at HJUK for the true picture.
Similar questions
I have a 2006 BMW X3 with 76,000 miles on the clock bought last year secondhand from a small local dealer. A few weeks ago the car developed a 'knocking noise' when slowing down to stop and then moving...
Last week the 7-speed DSG box of our March 2009 Volkswagen Touran Diesel packed up, having done 53,000 miles. As you can see from the mileage we do mostly distance driving and little in city traffic, moreover...
I've been reading about the problems with dual mass flywheels on diesel cars, but had thought it was only manual models that were susceptible. However, I've since heard that automatics can also be affected....
Related models
Unique styling. Solid build. Excellent petrol engines including frugal yet peppy 1.2 TSI. Good space in the back. Frugal 1.6 TDI Greenline can return 60mpg+.
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
