Missing MOT advisory

Hi, just collected approved used 2004 Jazz from the main dealer.

They 'forgot' to include the MOT advisory, or to return my call when I queried it, so I checked it online at the VOSA website.

The car will need new rear pads shortly it seems. This seems cheeky at best, and so very shortsighted.

Clearly pads are a wear item and not covered by the one year 'happiness' warranty, so would they really jeopardise my lifetime customer value for a quick £80?

It was the first time I've ever walked onto a Honda forecourt, let alone bought one! Or is it reasonable to expect an approved used vehicle from a main dealer to have an MOT advisory on brake pads?

Asked on 12 May 2011 by gingabeard

Answered by Honest John
They should have disclosed this to you.It is now illegal to fail to disclose details by omission and you have a good case to prove they deliberately concealed the fact that the rear pads needed replacing. I'd demand that they rectify the situation.
Dear Honest John,

Please help me choose my next car. I would like it to have:
    Select a few terms below
Similar questions
It seems that I have been taken for a ride. I bought a car off the internet with the advert stating it had a new MOT. I spoke to the guy, who said the clutch went on his way home after he MOT'd the van....
We have just bought a second hand car from a dealer and we found we had to immediately replace broken rear springs and shock absorbers. We understand that we can claim against the dealer, especially as...
I have the opportunity to have a car from a family friend, this car is 06 number plate has been sitting in a drive for two years with a SORN. My problem is that I am hesitant to take ownership of this...
Related models
Clever interior redefined the small car. Most space efficient small car built. Very reliable first 3 - 4 years.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer